And a Monarchy is not a form of Authoritarianism?
This is not like the old European monarchies.
The king of KSA has to have a consensus of the Merchants, Technocrats, the family and the clergy.
They still hold majlis all over the country every week... so citizens can access the leadership.
This is not like the old European monarchies.
The king of KSA has to have a consensus of the Merchants, Technocrats, the family and the clergy.
They still hold majlis all over the country every week... so citizens can access the leadership.
Ten man rule is far better than one man rule.And a Monarchy is not a form of Authoritarianism?
I don't think you understand the meaning of authoritarianism. I'm referring to a non-democratic regime, possibly one that doesn't respect civil liberties or human rights, but one that benefits the interests of the United States. I'm not talking about a government that enforces any laws at all. Western liberal democratic authoritarianism is oxymoronic.
And there is a difference, Mr hahahaha.hahahaha
.
When I mention authoritarianism, I'm not talking about rule of law. I'm talking about what you might consider totalitarianism, or dictatorship, etc.
There is an inherent contradiction in our ideals of promotion of freedom, and our support of autocracies such as Saudi Arabia and South Vietnam. When is such support justified?
And there is a difference, Mr hahahaha.
Man must prove to his government that he can handle freedom and liberty.There is an inherent contradiction in our ideals of promotion of freedom, and our support of autocracies such as Saudi Arabia and South Vietnam. When is such support justified?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?