Every time I hear party unity, is reminds me of The Nazis.Party unity. There is no uniting with the left. Way too many weak links aka "******s" not enough Patriots.
False dichotomy. Construct a better arugment.What matters more to right wingers, unity or owning the libs?
See to them, there's them, and then there's everyone else is a Nazi.Define "right wingers."
That seems to be a malleable term when it comes to those who profess to be progressives, socialists, neo-Liberals, communists, etc.. To them it means anyone who does not agree with their notions, ideals, views, and goals.
I've always considered myself a Classical Liberal:
What Is Classical Liberalism? Definition and Examples (thoughtco.com)
Shortly after joining the Forum I posted a "Hi I'm Me" newbie statement found here: Hi and here are my positons. Anyone wanna add me as a freind | Debate Politics
I later reposted it in a blog, also describing how I intend to participate in this Forum, found here: (1) Time To Re-Introduce Myself. | Debate Politics
The point of reposting is to show that my views in this Forum expressed since joining demonstrate exactly what I declared when I joined. Note that they do not reflect the alleged ideals the Left likes to attribute to those who do not agree with them, and use the label "right-winger" to disparage.
So, define "right-winger" as you perceive one to be...then maybe a debate can be had.
As for the poll itself?
Your options are both limited, and too generalized...trying to put a whole class into a tiny box when there are so many issues of greater importance than either "owning the Libs," or "Unity."
The left have been criticizing Trump for four years, claiming he is divisive. That implies that the left would not be divisive. In fact, Biden ran on uniting and healing the country. So, are you guys going to unite and heal the country or was all that just a lie?
False dichotomy. Construct a better arugment.
That is up to the voters and their lawmakers.And to allow that individual freedom to exist without any personal responsibility or consideration of any other citizens who exist, right?
Every time I hear party unity, is reminds me of The Nazis.
Neither.
Freedom, the Constitution, rule of law...those are some of the things that matter.
It's alarming that you pretend not to.It's cute you pretend to believe in those things.
It's alarming that you pretend not to.
Oh...wait...you ARE pretending, aren't you?
Nope. Went right over your head.That is up to the voters and their lawmakers.
I never said I wanted him to do any such thing.Did the Vice President have the authority to declare the results bad?
Where in the constitution does it say he can...
Yet you wanted him to.
Constitution and rule of law right out the window right there.
Your pretending to care about those things is funny.
I definitely do not want to own a lib. Too expensive.
I think it is rather that our political parties are thriving on division and aren't interested in unity, at all. It keeps them posh and us at each other.Unity is possible where we share the same humanitarian and democratic ideals. The reason why our national unity has shattered in the last forty years is because over time we stopped sharing those values. Obviously there was never going to be unity over policy (duh).
We have a very real problem because now we don't even agree that humanitarianism, democracy, truth and the rule of law are good.
I think it is rather that our political parties are thriving on division and aren't interested in unity, at all. It keeps them posh and us at each other.
Stereotyping is by definition a fallacy. I don't need to prove you incorrect, you did it all by yourself.
False dichotomy. Construct a better arugment.
The choice between national unity or owning the libs creates a false dichotomy for you?
I do not desire unity with people who call me an irredeemable racist deplorable and likely harbor fantasies about killing me communism style. I do not desire unity with people pushing hormones on kids to make perverts and cross dressers feel better.What matters more to right wingers, unity or owning the libs?
"They want to dictate over others"... when true fact is: they can't manage their own lives for spinning in agitations because they can't control and dictate over others.What matters more to right wingers, unity or owning the libs?
Sounds like your spin... is about things that are "none of your business". You might do better to try and manage your own perversions.I do not desire unity with people who call me an irredeemable racist deplorable and likely harbor fantasies about killing me communism style. I do not desire unity with people pushing hormones on kids to make perverts and cross dressers feel better.
It is absolutely is my business when a political faction is encouraging and inciting violence against me with rhetoric. It’s all of societies business when kids are being brainwashed into gender confusion and given hormones.Sounds like your spin... is about things that are "none of your business". You might do better to try and manage your own perversions.
And far too whiney.I definitely do not want to own a lib. Too expensive.
perverts just want to put girls on testosterone at age 12. It’s a damn shame that we can’t unite when one side is just bigots that have a problem with that.I think it is rather that our political parties are thriving on division and aren't interested in unity, at all. It keeps them posh and us at each other.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?