God-Is-Holy said:
Perhaps they should occupy themselves with working. Much more constructive. Unhappiness is no excuse for breaking the law.
It is asinine to think that people partake in criminal activity
only because they are un-employed. Even if south-central LA had 100% employment rate, criminal activity would still persist. Alot of crimes are motivated by
greed. Shoplifters usually only get caught when they become greedy. Did you ever hear of someone partaking in theft just once and get caught? And yet, the majority of shoplifters are
employed. Sure, unemployment is a precurser to crime, but it is not the sole reason.
Where specifically did I imply this?
By implying that we adopt the OT laws, in turn you are saying that you wish us to be as caveman-esque as the OT. When I feel the need for mytholgy, I read the OT, sometimes I feel like I'm reading stories from Conan the Barbarian.LOL
Correct. What's your point?
That it was war-filled and barbaric. The ancient "pretend" world was filled with mutual hatred and intense rivalries. There were no boundaries. Land was always up for grabs.
Conquer or be conquered seemed to be thr rule of the OT.
Soul? Once again, there is
no proof of a unique soul given to each and every person. As soon as there's ample proof, I'll be the first to admit I was wrong.
Dude, how can you continue to disregard what
science has actually proven? I think you need to read up on what science actually is, before you spew rabid, asinine claims.:lol: Atoms and molecules result in the said being having certain traits and limbs. ie, be a herbivore or carnivore, have 2 legs, 3 legs, even a wing or two. This genetic phrase in which every living being possess, is called the
genetic code in science. It is rather naive to think that everyone has a "unique" and "etherael" soul, escaping from the body after death.
Your confusing a human soul with a human spirit. The word 'soul' originates from the greek word 'sykekos', from whence we also get our word 'psyche'. Hence the 'soul' is the 'psyche'. Psychologists and psychiatrists deal with psyches (or souls). The psyche (or soul) is very different from the ethereal human spirit.
Wrong again.:lol:
Soul is synomynous with
spirit. And they both mean, in laymen's terms, "breath".
What's the difference between a corpse and a living person? In the fairy story of creation, Genesis, "God" had to
breath into Adam the "breath of life" in order for him to be a living soul.
And how is this relevant to our conversation? You're delving off into a tangent.
I was simply showing
irrefutable proof, that everyone has a unique genetic code. I can't help it your ignorance of science clouds your judgements, and so you turn to "blind faith".
And how does this make him a false Christian as you assert? You're just confirming your judgmental disposition.
Well, am I wrong here, or does Jesus teach to "turn the other cheek"? But no, George Bush wants to punish violence with violence, and obviously Jesus and Gandhi were right. If he would follow Jesus, like he loves to claim, he would love his enemies, and not have started a war that continues to this day with no end in sight. He is no Christian. That story about how a pastor was struck in the face while preaching is a great example of what Christianity should strive to be like. He is indeed following in the footsteps of the Christ
turning the other cheek. I applaud him.
Which ancient transcriber are you referring to? There are multiple biblical authors.
Yes, there are. And they are all no-tech, primitive people,are they not? Moses. Am I wrong here, or did he just write in narrative? He is the only one, well according to the bible, who actually took guidance directly from the man himself. David. I think he just wrote Psalms. I'm pretty positive that he just wrote the parts of life which he was processing. Jeremiah. According to your holy book, he was disconcerted because his people continued to sway from god. He knew that this act would lead to their own undoing. I beleive he was a prohphet, and he said everything to convince his people to turn back to god. That's my take on your "mythology". There were many transcribers. In the case of Moses, it was dictation. Each primitve person who wrote it, did so from their own place ion history.
Before Witney's printing press,
scribes used their whole lives to copy this mythological book. Translating the Bible from it's opriginal language into another language was a tenous task. It meant that people were making different distinctions about what god was actually stating. I think the OT was originally written in Hebrew. (makes sense since all of its writers were Hebrews) I beleive the NT was written in Greek, hence Alexander the Great conquered the area and made it the official language. Of course there were distortions, word for word translations, made it harder for the reader to comprehend, because some languages use different propositions and words than others. Thought for thought is a bit easier to read, but again it is what the person thinks a phrase means.
Now you're simply getting judgmental again. Are you against capital punishment too?
Of course. Who granted us the power of "playing god?"
I don't think that it'll happen.
Of course it won't, because he dosen't exist. For sure, I can't prove it, but neither can you. We can't prosecute and execute an entity that dosen't really exist, now can we?
Thanks for the links, but I prefer someone who can present their own arguments, and not simply somebody else's.
Thanks. But I wanted to back up my arguments.
You don't strike me as virtuously religious.
That's because I'm not, if you didn't notice.:2razz:
By what standard? By the law? Or by your own?
Well, if you didn't know, fanatical is synomynous with extreme. He waged a war on the economic interests of Americans, place inadequaete regulations to protect the environment, waged a war on jobs, on unemployment programs, the poor, the old, labor unions, and his extreme policies that waged war on civil liberties and constituional principles (patriot act).:lol:
Again, where's your evidence?
Of what exactly? Of him actaully beleiving a "divine" entity is communicating with him:
http://www.patridiots.com/000552.html
Up to this point, you don't seem to have either God or Satan concisely defined. I've merely heard slanted distortions thus far. First you assert that God is a murderer, and then you contrast God against Satan with the idea that God is not a murderer. You're simply vascillating. This is why I don't trust your judgments of Bush's character.
Of course I do,
god is an "omnipotent", "mythological" entity, sitting on the clouds, hurling thunderbolts at peeps, and
satan is a red-skinned, horney and hooved beast, sitting in a burning abyss, plucking up "sinners" with a pitchfork.
I think I have a pretty good idea!
Thanks for all of the links, but I prefer to debate with someone who thinks for themself. You're simply being swayed by the wild theories of others. Please present your own arguments, as opposed to someone else's. No need to be the 'link king'.
Hows about
you provide some links to back up your wild assertions? Or, are you a liar?