- Joined
- May 19, 2006
- Messages
- 156,720
- Reaction score
- 53,497
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Moderator's Warning: |
1) The personal attacks continue. The next one receives consequences, regardless of who makes it. 2) The Israeli genocide and ethnic cleansing comments are thiny veiled hate speech as they are indirectly aimed at Israeli Jews. Some of the claims made here, are outrageous. It stops now or some people's posting priveleges will be suspended or revoked. 3) The nasty anti-Muslim statements also must cease. You want to post facts, be my guest. You want to insult an entire group of people, go to the Basement, go to a different forum, or don't post at all. 4) Don't think that by saying you are anti-Israel you get a pass on not being anti-Jew. Again, thinly veiled as it may be, many of these posts reek of ethnic aggression. There are ways to show disagreement with Israeli policies without showing ethnic aggression. Some people post like this. Many do not. For those of you who do not, follow the directions I outlined in #3. I understand this is an emotional topic. That doesn't excuse some of the behavior I've seen here. It stops now. |
If I was an anti-semite then I would profess it outwright. Like my thinking of the vast majority of posters such as yourself as deluded or just plain sly wankers who try weally weally hard to make those who do not follow your way of thinking as "anti-semites".
No, I don't think so. Your use of the word "genocide" tells us that you are either ignorant of its meaning or you are an anti-Semite bent on using the worst word you can think of. I will give you two definitions.
Genocide = the deliberate and systematic extermination...
Genocide is the mass killing of a group of people as defined by Article 2 of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (CPPCG) as "any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group, as such: killing members of the group; causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life, calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; and forcibly transferring children of the group to another group."
I don't care why you feel the need to describe the situation as genocide. That would be a personal issue for you. However, you are very transparent and I can prove it. With clear and internationally recognized examples like Rwanda, Yugoslavia, and Darfur, in which the majority of the world remained(s) absolutely silent unless they were(are) taking time to shed a few crocodile tears in front of cameras, plenty of individuals are appear to be fixed on labeling Israelites as genocidal monsters.
Well, I don't see Palesintinians being exterminated. I do however see individuals who are willing to excuse any responsibility away from them to raise them up to the level of the Rwandans, Sudanese, Native Americans, and the Jews (Holocaust). Something tells me that if the Palestinians were in this situation against their fellow Arabs (like countless are throughout the Middle East) and not Jews, you wouldn't even whisper about it.
And by the way....
Insults come in many cultures. British slang isn't excused.
So if i accused the Brittish government of genocide in Ireland would i be anti-saxon? I the issue here is that posters are being punished on the basis of what sentiment the moderators *belive* is *behind* what they say. Surely theres room for error here? Why not moderate what people are saying rather then why you belive they are saying it? The term genocide may be melodramtic but thats not the same as anti-semitism:roll:
Moderator's Warning: |
Consider this a wrist slap. |
Professor Gardener,
It is not baseless...infact, it has more base than false branding of makhno as an anti-semite.
Surely thats a problem on *both* sides though? The isrealis involved in the destruction of palestinian olive groves obviously have some issue with the right of the palestinans to exist as individuals, let alone as a state.
There have been nasty acts committed by both sides; however, it should be noted that most of the violence starts with Palestine and ends with Palestinians whining about Israel's retaliation.
Ahem, so , what is Israel's main goal for the OT today, peace through settlement? Or peace by actions meant to bring about the removal of the population?
If Israel's goal was "land expansion", they'd have never given back the Sinia Peninsula.
If the "palestinian" people's goal was peace, they would have voted for a gov't that would recognize the right of Israel to exist... as expressely stated by UN Resolution 242 (the so-called "'67 Borders" argument).
"(ii)Termination of all claims or states of belligerency and respect for and acknowledgement of the sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence of every State in the area and their right to live in peace within secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force;
So when every state in the region recognizes Israel's right to EXIST, then you can come back with griping about "occupied" territories. Until then, arguing that Israel is "taking" land, is merely hypocrisy. Until then, Israel can "occupy" to their hearts content, to defend her people against the genocide her enemies wish to impose upon her, as it's clear that the problem here is the Palestininans and those muslim nations throughout the region, and their refusal to abide by UN Resolution 242 by recognizing Israel's right to exist.
You don't seriously believe that all of Israel's acts are either retaliation or premtive, do you?
OK well here's what I wanted to say,
Most Arab states do recognize Israel, including the Arab League. In fact in 2002 Saudi Arabia made a peace plan that was backed unanimously by the AL. A peace plan that US-Israel ignored. Now if Israel's policy wasn't land expantion then they wouldn't have been in the OT for so long, nor would they have made it such a brutal occupation, nor would they build settelments, which are obviously a barrier to peace.
OK well here's what I wanted to say,
Most Arab states do recognize Israel, including the Arab League. In fact in 2002 Saudi Arabia made a peace plan that was backed unanimously by the AL. A peace plan that US-Israel ignored. Now if Israel's policy wasn't land expantion then they wouldn't have been in the OT for so long, nor would they have made it such a brutal occupation, nor would they build settelments, which are obviously a barrier to peace.
OK well here's what I wanted to say,
Most Arab states do recognize Israel, including the Arab League. In fact in 2002 Saudi Arabia made a peace plan that was backed unanimously by the AL. A peace plan that US-Israel ignored. Now if Israel's policy wasn't land expantion then they wouldn't have been in the OT for so long, nor would they have made it such a brutal occupation, nor would they build settelments, which are obviously a barrier to peace.
You don't seriously believe that all of Israel's acts are either retaliation or premtive, do you?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?