double barrel coach gun is good for home defense. but a mossberg pump is better and a benelli M2 semi shotgun even better
Well, we can shoot them ourselves.
You reckon we can write off our ammo on our income tax?
Hey, you know me. Always thinking.
Boars are the worst from what I understand, I've been told bear attacks usually come from getting too close or encroaching at the wrong time but boars are aggressive and will charge whenever they feel like it.everyone i know who hunts in texas carries a 44 or higher as a side arm,not cuz of jamming,but because when you are deer hunting,and a deranged boar gets ready to charge,you pop of all your bolt action rounds and hes still standing,you could reload but your best bet is to grab a high powered revolver and pop off as many as you can into tha boar.
in both bears and boars,precise shots count,a slight failure means a pissed off animal,and if your in texas,hunting anyting means youll probably run into a boar,theyare so huge and overpopulated here cities in certain areas actually pay hunters to kill them and set up no limit kill zones for them.boars are just crazy,3 30-06 rounds to the head and they just shake it off like nothin happened,if you didnt hit your mark a 44 cal or higher is needed or your dead.
Boars are the worst from what I understand, I've been told bear attacks usually come from getting too close or encroaching at the wrong time but boars are aggressive and will charge whenever they feel like it.
Not really a rifle though.
Does a single action revolver qualify as semi-automatic? A six shooter can only take six bullets limiting the amount of carnage. Handguns with clips holding more rounds = more carnage. But if you can't defend yourself using six bullets, then you probably need training and shouldn't have a gun.So far as I know, ALL pistols are semi-auto. You would ban ALL pistols. It's only a trick question if you don't know what you're talking about. One round per trigger pull = semi-auto.
So far as I know, ALL pistols are semi-auto.
Actually, it is a rifle.
The PHALANX (as is it's predecessor) is commonly called a "cannon", but in reality it is a gatling style rifle. It fires closed cartridges with a fixed propellent that is non-explosive (but it is incendiary bursting). And it is fired from a 6-barrel (progressive RH parabolic twist, 9 grooves) electric or hydraulically revolving firing system.
So yes, it is a rifle.
I don't play games Moot, and I don't take bait willingly.
".... Assuming that my aiming is good (which it is), a well-placed shot with my Ruger 10/22 can take out just about anyone, unless he has an extraordinary amount of fat on his chest...."
Does a single action revolver qualify as semi-automatic? A six shooter can only take six bullets limiting the amount of carnage. Handguns with clips holding more rounds = more carnage. But if you can't defend yourself using six bullets, then you probably need training and shouldn't have a gun.
See, that's the problem right there. Gun righters don't know half of what they claim and worse yet, they can't even agree among themselves on terminology and types of weapons. I see you guys constantly correcting each other. So if you can't agree on your own verbage, then how can you expect a novice like me to know more than you in order to ban the type of weapons that don't belong in our communities?
Hey, I thought it was all about self defense with you guys? If not then you do need to justify your possession of guns that don't belong in a decent, civilized, society......and by the looks of what I'm seeing on TV and in the polls...your justifications doesn't seem to be holding much water. The wheat is finally separating itself from the chaffe as I speak. lolWhy should anyone have to justify being allowed to posses something that is outlined as a right? It would seem more prudent to justify banning it instead. If, for instance, I proposed an outlaw to a certain phrase, such as "pink turkey," which is a nonsensical thing to say, would you accept it openly because "you don't need" to be allowed to say it? Or, would like some meaningful evidence that such a phrase is harmful?
Nope, all we've gotten so far is doublespeak. ie: "If you don't know the precise terminology and what all the accessories are, then how can you ban guns that kill massive amounts of innocent people?"
So I asked the gun righty's, then what weapons should be banned? Answer: <crickets>
Well, how about this?
It might require some regulation and I know how you hate the word, but check it out.
1. Anyone who uses a gun, any gun, during the commission of a crime gets capitol punishment within 45 days of conviction.
2. Anyone who sells or tranfers a gun to anyone without going through the proper procedures get twenty years in prison for each offense with no time off for good behavior.
3. Anyone who steals a gun gets capitol punishment within 45 days of conviction.
4. Any felon caught with a gun gets capitol punishment within 45 days of conviction.
5. No plea bargaining when guns are in the equation.
Think that might help?
I think it couldn't hurt to try.
Hey, I thought it was all about self defense with you guys? If not then you do need to justify your possession of guns that don't belong in a decent, civilized, society......and by the looks of what I'm seeing on TV and in the polls...your justifications doesn't seem to be holding much water. The wheat is finally separating itself from the chaffe as I speak. lol
That would qualify as Constitutional.
Hey, I like that idea. You got my vote on that one. Goooooooo Captain America. woo woo wooo....assuming they own property of course. I even know the county sheriff personally and I'm going to mention your idea to him when I see him at our annual xmas party. Good one captain. It would be so kewl if he went for it. I'll let you know what he says.You know. You might be on to something. What if off duty police donated time to guard the schools their children attend and then the city will credit them at time and half pay scale in property tax credit. That way, the officer has no extra income to pay income taxes on, our children are guarded and the city just has to do without one convention trip or christmas party.
A penny saved is a penny earned.
Vote for Captain America!
A pot in every chicken!
Stopping these bad guys might go a long way to helping reduce crime and homicide across the board....yeah there is
get rid of victim disarmament zones
if we accept that wolves exist, we need wolf hounds to be among the sheep or give the rams some pistols
See my post above regarding the black market and you will find your precious legal gun dealers are the worst of the lot. But I haven't seen a mass murder yet in this country that didn't involve guns. (cue nota bene) Not even Richard Speck.Why do people need revolvers?
Mass shootings would be impossible with a musket!
Surely killers couldn't just obtain them illegally from black markets (that would be illegal!), nor could they use a knife or something else...
Fair enough. Though most rifle definitions also require the weapon to be shoulder mounted.
Why would 2nd amendment proponents want weapons that are currently legal to be banned?
That all depends on who makes it.
"Rifling" actually describes the lands and groves cut into the barrel itself. This is what diferentiates a Rifle from a Musket.
Good point.
Because, as it has been drilled into us for the last several years by the gun fanatics, there are only cosmetic differences between the assault weapons and other weapons that are available legally. Therefore, there is no hardship that can legitimately be claimed by the fanatics now.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?