• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

What is Alt-Right?

Sure, comments about inherently violent blacks...is not racist. Any other logic free blurtations you want to get out of your system? Do you need me to draw you a picture about how that is racist....since the words used are apparently too tough for you to understand?

Yes, because mentioning statistics is racist...

Although that reminds me of ESPN's new section "the Undefeated" where they basically said black peoples' (as a whole) disinterest with statistics is one of the things preventing many of them from getting upper-level sports jobs that have become much more statistics-focused recently.

So, maybe mentioning statistics is indeed racist. Who am I to judge?
 
Whites didn't do enough to equalize society after abolishing slavery. The playing field was not immediately leveled. Reparations seek to undo that.

The reparations demand from BLM is what annoys me the most out of all of them.

If there were slaves that were alive today I'd maybe support reparations for those that were directly affected by slavery.

But there are no slaves alive today. Nor are there any former slaves owners alive today.

So I have to ask: Reparations for what?
 
Gimmy gimmy gimmy is more equivocation, just like the Marxism ridiculousness.
As I knew you of course didn't read the link. It is a list of blm's demands. DEMANDS. That isn't my equivocation that is their words.

Whites didn't do enough to equalize society after abolishing slavery.
I will give them a shovel and they can go dig up those assholes and do what they want to them.

The playing field was not immediately leveled. Reparations seek to undo that.
The playing field is even now. So cram it with reparations. You doubt deserve money for being black.

Further, many areas with higher black populations have sub-par access to public education.
That is because the property values are low because when people start making money they get the hell out of there. Because crime is high. It isn't Asian, and Hispanic people going to those naighborhoods and committing crime. The biggest block to investigation is lack of witnesses coming forward. And why won't they come forward? Because snitches get stitches. So is it that says that? White people? Asians?

I think that every American deserves access to quality education- maybe you think blacks don't deserve that ?
They have every opportunity.
 
Sure, comments about inherently violent blacks...is not racist.
When did he say that?

Any other logic free blurtations you want to get out of your system? Do you need me to draw you a picture about how that is racist....since the words used are apparently too tough for you to understand?
You'll have to explain how that is racist. If you can't than you can concede gracefully but not likely.
 
Yes, because mentioning statistics is racist...

Although that reminds me of ESPN's new section "the Undefeated" where they basically said black peoples' (as a whole) disinterest with statistics is one of the things preventing many of them from getting upper-level sports jobs that have become much more statistics-focused recently.

So, maybe mentioning statistics is indeed racist. Who am I to judge?
Oh, it isn't that blacks, in your example, are "disinterested in stats"...that is racism......it is that the word "stats", or mentioning it, is.

Good grief, exactly how do you get to this point? How do you evolve up, use a pc, wash yerself....make a living......and yet still allow yerself to post such incomprehensible trash like this?
 
When did he say that?


You'll have to explain how that is racist. If you can't than you can concede gracefully but not likely.
You have already proven that words, the meaning they contain, the ability to comprehend this use of language....is far beyond your capabilities....and you keep reinforcing this understanding.....so no, it won't do any good to use more words detailing how a reference to blacks becoming violent to a greater degree than any other member of the crowd protesting...is racist. And, I'm understanding too that drawing a picture won't help, because that requires an even higher level of comprehension in being able to discern concepts from imagery.....so, you and i are at a dead end, there is no means to convey the understanding to you.
 
Oh, it isn't that blacks, in your example, are "disinterested in stats"...that is racism......it is that the word "stats", or mentioning it, is.

Good grief, exactly how do you get to this point? How do you evolve up, use a pc, wash yerself....make a living......and yet still allow yerself to post such incomprehensible trash like this?

Why can't you argue the point? Mentioning stats is not racist. That's aknowledging facts. Facts aren't racist.

The stats don't line up with the social justice narrative. This you have to attack the very mention of them, that's just using facts to prove a point. A point you could smash to bits with facts at any moment...If the point was wrong.
 
Yes i can.
We'll start with blm because it's so easy.

https://policy.m4bl.org/reparations/

Basically it says give black people money, give them free school, gimmy gimmy gimmy. For no other rain than they ate black. That's Marxism.

No it isn't. Its really easy to just say something is something without going into detail as to why.


is more about female supremacy. Women have fat more privilege than men do. The fascism comes where they try to say you can't go against feminism.

more assertions without evidence
 
The reparations demand from BLM is what annoys me the most out of all of them.

If there were slaves that were alive today I'd maybe support reparations for those that were directly affected by slavery.

But there are no slaves alive today. Nor are there any former slaves owners alive today.

So I have to ask: Reparations for what?

You may find this enlightening. Reparations are not only about slavery.

The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
 
You have already proven that words, the meaning they contain, the ability to comprehend this use of language....is far beyond your capabilities....and you keep reinforcing this understanding.....so no, it won't do any good to use more words detailing how a reference to blacks becoming violent to a greater degree than any other member of the crowd protesting...is racist. And, I'm understanding too that drawing a picture won't help, because that requires an even higher level of comprehension in being able to discern concepts from imagery.....so, you and i are at a dead end, there is no means to convey the understanding to you.

So anybody that disagrees with you is just a dumbass that can't understand English?

This is why these retarded protests fail. The people that make them can't counter the points being made against them. So they resort to calling names such as racist bigot, homophobe, ignorant. They go to attack of the messenger.

The good thing that Yiannopoulos is doing is showing how empty and devoid these things are. It's purly emotional and it's only to shut people up. It doesn't work any more.

You really need to get a new weapon. The alt right is immune to the one you are using.
 
Dodging every question that is posed to you dosent prove anything either. It almost supports the idea that you are lying.

Because it's irrelevant. I want to know said they want white only illegal immigration and how they are in the "alt right." You linking Wikipedia crap doesn't have anything to do with it.

I shouldn't have to do YOUR research. You made claim you support them otherwise everybody should assume you're lying.

You were presented a quote from Spencer, who you acknowledge is a white supremacist, and he's a founder. But you dismissed that because you've never heard of him. But if that's your standard, probably no one I can quote will meet your arbitrary test of already knowing who these people are. I pointed to videos at an alt-right site, one of the first and still one that has several leading writers, that you ignored, presumably because you haven't heard of that website. Well, your standards are impossible to meet as you've asserted them because your current ignorance is all you need to disregard them.
 
Why can't you argue the point? Mentioning stats is not racist.
That isn't a point....because no one is arguing that "mentioning stats" is racist. This is a red herring, a straw argument.


That's aknowledging facts.
Well, there you are.
Facts aren't racist.
More straw, see point one.

The stats don't line up with the social justice narrative. This you have to attack the very mention of them, that's just using facts to prove a point. A point you could smash to bits with facts at any moment...If the point was wrong.
The "point" brought up by milo the queer wasn't about "the facts", he was arguing about the genetic causation, a concept you keep proving over and over has not entered into your consciousness.
 
So anybody that disagrees with you is just a dumbass that can't understand English?
I did not say "anybody"

This is why these retarded protests fail. The people that make them can't counter the points being made against them. So they resort to calling names such as racist bigot, homophobe, ignorant. They go to attack of the messenger.
The irony being....milo the queer engaged in racist commentary.

The good thing that Yiannopoulos is doing is showing how empty and devoid these things are. It's purly emotional and it's only to shut people up. It doesn't work any more.
Again, milo is the provocateur, that was already established. He is the reactionary element, and by definition, that is the irrational path.

You really need to get a new weapon. The alt right is immune to the one you are using.
If that is to mean that labeling them racists does not negatively affect them personally, I agree, they revel in it.
 
No it isn't. Its really easy to just say something is something without going into detail as to why.
I don't care why. The fact that is Marxism tells me enough. They can work hard and achieve things without that. Our president didn't have that and he's black.




more assertions without evidence
Women ate privileged to have the following;
Women only scholarships
Parental rights prior to birth
Work with children without their motives being questioned
Lower suicide rates
Lower instace of homicide
When they get raped it isn't a joke.
Lower fatality rate on the job.
Lower instance of depression.
Extra time off after their child is born.
And the list goes on.
 
Oh, it isn't that blacks, in your example, are "disinterested in stats"...that is racism......it is that the word "stats", or mentioning it, is.

Good grief, exactly how do you get to this point? How do you evolve up, use a pc, wash yerself....make a living......and yet still allow yerself to post such incomprehensible trash like this?

Did I forget to mention I can't read? So, yeah. Good luck trying to convince me I'm a moron using an internet message board when I can't even read your insults. Also, how one uses the internet without developing a healthy sense of humor, sarcasm, and thick skin is any man's guess. Unless you're a 3rd wave feminist; then it's any woman's guess.
 
The reparations demand from BLM is what annoys me the most out of all of them.

If there were slaves that were alive today I'd maybe support reparations for those that were directly affected by slavery.

But there are no slaves alive today. Nor are there any former slaves owners alive today.

So I have to ask: Reparations for what?

Indeed. I have to agree.

You may find this enlightening. Reparations are not only about slavery.

The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic

Reparations for all the ills of society is going to open a bottomless pit into which all monies will be sucked into just as matter is sucked into a black hole.

No, this precedent cannot be allowed to be set. If you believe that there's a case for a class action law suite and financial remuneration, by all means, file it. But don't be proposing spending, and wasting, other people's money to salve your own conscious.
 
I did not say "anybody"
Oh so it's personal against me? So you have a prejudice against me? Is it because I'm gay?

The irony being....milo the queer engaged in racist commentary.
It doesn't work anymore it isn't racist

Again, milo is the provocateur, that was already established. He is the reactionary element, and by definition, that is the irrational path.
I don't think he gives a **** what you think of him.

If that is to mean that labeling them racists does not negatively affect them personally, I agree, they revel in it.
It goes further than that. It degrades the word racist to the point it means nothing. When you get to the point where you call commentary racist because you don't like it, racism becomes a joke. Well done.
 
Did I forget to mention I can't read? So, yeah. Good luck trying to convince me I'm a moron using an internet message board when I can't even read your insults. Also, how one uses the internet without developing a healthy sense of humor, sarcasm, and thick skin is any man's guess. Unless you're a 3rd wave feminist; then it's any woman's guess.

Good grief, exactly how do you get to this point? How do you evolve up, use a pc, wash yerself....make a living......and yet still allow yerself to post such incomprehensible trash like this?
 
Good grief, exactly how do you get to this point? How do you evolve up, use a pc, wash yerself....make a living......and yet still allow yerself to post such incomprehensible trash like this?

Odin's raven, you're right. I incorrectly used that semicolon. Please accept my humblest apologies.

P.S. Is anyone else mildly amused by the irony in this?
 
That isn't a point....because no one is arguing that "mentioning stats" is racist. This is a red herring, a straw argument.
Okay so what is the Racist part? Because earlier it sounded like you said mentioning stats was racist. Forgive me, what did you really mean?


Well, there you are. More straw, see point one.
Explain how I'm misrepresenting your argument.

The "point" brought up by milo the queer wasn't about "the facts", he was arguing about the genetic causation, a concept you keep proving over and over has not entered into your consciousness.
Good lord what was it about? Do you even know?
 
Reparations for all the ills of society is going to open a bottomless pit into which all monies will be sucked into just as matter is sucked into a black hole.

No, this precedent cannot be allowed to be set. If you believe that there's a case for a class action law suite and financial remuneration, by all means, file it. But don't be proposing spending, and wasting, other people's money to salve your own conscious.

And black people aren't the only ones that have endured injustices in this country.

Why don't we just give reparations to everyone who has ever faced some kind of injustice in this country?
 
Back
Top Bottom