• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

What if I told you...

Yep - and our money driven, two party sytem lets you pick either one. ;)
 
I would say yes and that we need both to balance the bird...I just wish both wings would lose the disease attached to their feathers so we could fly straight and true
 
One may argue that all 4 political spectrum's belong to the same... dog? Or cat maybe? Since there are 4 legs?
 
That's why it is in all our best interest to make sure that bird is an eagle and not a turkey.
 
i'll vote for whoever doesn't try to disarm me. it seems only someone who wants to do something nasty to me would want to disarm me. currently democrats want to disarm me. so i see a distinct difference between republicans and democrats as of October 4th 2015.

guns-and-gun-free-zones1.jpg


https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42987.pdf
 
I'd do what any Native American would do; I'd jump out the truck, chase down the bird, and strangle the crap out of it. "Lunch!" And yup, I've actually seen that happen. Pic is of "Big Head," btw. Photo taken by Edward S. Curtis with a grant of $75000 from JP Morgan, who was concerned about documenting Native American culture.
 
Last edited:
QuadpolarNutjob said:
i'll vote for whoever doesn't try to disarm me. it seems only someone who wants to do something nasty to me would want to disarm me. currently democrats want to disarm me. so i see a distinct difference between republicans and democrats as of October 4th 2015.
Click to expand...

:roll:

Your political paranoia is part of the poison bringing the bird crashing towards the ground.
 
~SAL said:
I would say yes and that we need both to balance the bird...I just wish both wings would lose the disease attached to their feathers so we could fly straight and true
Click to expand...

I'd prefer something more like an octopus perhaps. Or at least a dog.
 
I'm the birds poop excitedly waiting to hit you in the face on your morning commute.
 
Burn that village down, boys, burn that village down.
 
~SAL said:
I would say yes and that we need both to balance the bird...I just wish both wings would lose the disease attached to their feathers so we could fly straight and true
Click to expand...

If only they could agree on where straight and true are.
 
I assume you meant to say less corruption and more honesty and transparency. I agree. I support single term limits. I think it would improve things in that area.
 
QuadpolarNutjob said:
i'll vote for whoever doesn't try to disarm me. it seems only someone who wants to do something nasty to me would want to disarm me. currently democrats want to disarm me. so i see a distinct difference between republicans and democrats as of October 4th 2015.
Click to expand...


I was going to mention how ignorant it is to think that having a gun can protect you from ANY government, especially a right-wing, fascist one, but saw that you have the name "nut job" in your moniker, so....yeah...never mind.
 
D_NATURED said:
I was going to mention how ignorant it is to think that having a gun can protect you from ANY government, especially a right-wing, fascist one, but saw that you have the name "nut job" in your moniker, so....yeah...never mind.
Click to expand...

Funny how some guys think they can "defend themselves" against laser guided smart bombs, stealth aircraft, atomic bombs, biological weapons, nuclear powered submarines, tanks, drones, uranium depleted projectiles, rail guns, .... all with their little band of redneck brothers sporting a few ar-15's and some 40 caliber glocks.
 
Whenever there are competing interests chasing a whole lot of money and power, they will do similar things in order to reach those things and maintain their hold on them. It's the nature of the beast. It's up to the public to tame it.
 
Dragonfly said:
Funny how some guys think they can "defend themselves" against laser guided smart bombs, stealth aircraft, atomic bombs, biological weapons, nuclear powered submarines, tanks, drones, uranium depleted projectiles, rail guns, .... all with their little band of redneck brothers sporting a few ar-15's and some 40 caliber glocks.
Click to expand...

I think the fantasy that runs through their little minds involves hoards of lawless black people looting from and killing good, honest white folk and they, the redneck saviors of America, can finally "take back" their country from liberalism and the black sea of entitled welfare state dependents. They are usually not deep thinkers and, instead, tend to run on self-placating BS.

I would say "ignore them" but they really are well armed and I can't help but think they are so full of anger and christian end-times dogma that they really do put society's delicate balance at risk. So, I'll just say keep your head down when the asshats come locked and loaded, and make sure you brush up on your red neck sayings like "thank you, Jesus" and "God bless 'merica". That'll throw them off your scent. They're highly motivated but not very smart.
 
Dragonfly said:
Funny how some guys think they can "defend themselves" against laser guided smart bombs, stealth aircraft, atomic bombs, biological weapons, nuclear powered submarines, tanks, drones, uranium depleted projectiles, rail guns, .... all with their little band of redneck brothers sporting a few ar-15's and some 40 caliber glocks.
Click to expand...
The Iraqis and Afghanies have been doing it for over ten years. The Vietnamese did it for nearly ten years and eventually won. What I find strange is that one would advocate using those weapons against civilian populations on American soil, and think there wouldn't be a political backlash of revolutionary proportions.
 
Dragonfly said:
View attachment 67191084

Chew on that for a while. :mrgreen:
Click to expand...
I'd giggle at you, realize that people that extol their "Centrist" positions are merely indecisive and generally vote Democrat 100% of the time and move on to something more interesting, like that periscope stream "Paint Drying".
 
ttwtt78640 said:
Yep - and our money driven, two party sytem lets you pick either one. ;)
Click to expand...


I recently read that the UK has four or more parties. Can you imagine? They're viable and people get elected from all four! That seems amazing to me. We have some others, but they don't get elected often enough to be considered viable, IMO.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom