• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

What happens when the National Guard leaves

No, the manner in which you do it is also important. The process is important.

yes. the Sheep left to themselves will cause chaos and violence.

there are Solutions, but we are not ready for them yet.


In Islamic countries they lop off the hand of shoplifters. I guess that's one way to stop shoplifting. Would you recommend that here too? I thought the west was supposed to be "enlightened" and moving away from barbaric and primitive practices like that.

well yeah, kinda severe and horrific, but it does work for them.

eventually the Solution world wide is for a Christian Theocracy to come to power. we christians will rule with Jesus using an Iron Rod so to speak. it may involve loping off the hands of thieves, but we have to wait and see on that.


blessings, Zero days.


 
I think I read somewhere they've taken a thousand criminals off the streets so far. If the NG left today, that means there's a thousand less criminal roaming around DC.

Do you think there's another thousand people waiting to take their place as soon as the NG leaves?
When someone is arrested, it means they are a criminal, right? And when the number reaches 10,000, it means there are 10,000 less criminals on the streets, and when that number is one million, it means there are that many less criminals off the streets BECAUSE THEY WERE ARRESTED.

It kind of renders the court system obsolete, don't you think?
 
yes. the Sheep left to themselves will cause chaos and violence.

there are Solutions, but we are not ready for them yet.




well yeah, kinda severe and horrific, but it does work for them.

eventually the Solution world wide is for a Christian Theocracy to come to power. we christians will rule with Jesus using an Iron Rod so to speak. it may involve loping off the hands of thieves, but we have to wait and see on that.


blessings, Zero days.
Yeah, the Bible is full of examples of Jesus advocating mutilation as appropriate discipline.

You see? You have something in common with repressive Muslim countries. You should get together with them and build on that.
 
No, the manner in which you do it is also important. The process is important.

In Islamic countries they lop off the hand of shoplifters. I guess that's one way to stop shoplifting. Would you recommend that here too? I thought the west was supposed to be "enlightened" and moving away from barbaric and primitive practices like that.

View attachment 67586239View attachment 67586238 View attachment 67586240
Why do you feel you have to make such a ridiculous and extreme argument?
 
I think I read somewhere they've taken a thousand criminals off the streets so far. If the NG left today, that means there's a thousand less criminal roaming around DC.

Do you think there's another thousand people waiting to take their place as soon as the NG leaves?
To answer your question, No, I don't believe there is another "thousand" waiting to take the place after the NG leaves.
There are the criminals who have yet to be caught who can commit the crimes.

Do you believe the use of the National Guard on a temporary basis is a good long-term solution to crime in cities?
 
Yeah, the Bible is full of examples of Jesus advocating mutilation as appropriate discipline.

You see? You have something in common with repressive Muslim countries. You should get together with them and build on that.

we kinda keep separate with these things........but we were the Originals, the Muslims came kinda late. the Bible in the new testament does state that the state will carry the sword against Evil doers; maybe the Loping off practice has some support?

the pictures of the Loping off process were kind of Graphic, but i guess they want the Sheep to see exactly what happens to their Criminals over there.

look at San Fransisco, seems some of these methods might work fairly well for them also.


blessings, Zero days. September will solve a lot of our issues such as above.


.
 
Why do you feel you have to make such a ridiculous and extreme argument?

The United States is the frog in the boiling pot. Trump is cranking up the temperature slowly and not only are you not jumping out, you’re cheering it on.

We’re on our path to be coming indistinguishable from fundamentalist Islamic countries. The founding fathers of this country would have been horrified.
 
Last edited:
Why do you feel you have to make such a ridiculous and extreme argument?

maybe not so extreme, even for Christians.

i looked into this a bit deeper and sure enuf the Bible says the sword is the answer for Criminals...


For he is God’s servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for he does not bear the sword in vain. For he is the servant of God, an avenger who carries out God’s wrath on the wrongdoer" Romans 13:4



my AI Bot perplexity totally agrees with my Christian opinion below....


The Bible mentions that the state "carries the sword" as a metaphor for its authority to punish wrongdoers, most clearly in Romans 13:4, which describes rulers as God's servants who bear the sword "not in vain" and execute wrath on those who do evil.

Romans 13:4 Explained

  • Romans 13:4 states: "For he is God’s servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for he does not bear the sword in vain. For he is the servant of God, an avenger who carries out God’s wrath on the wrongdoer".
  • The "sword" is symbolically linked to state power to administer punishment, potentially even extending to capital punishment.
  • This passage positions the government as an agent of God's justice on earth, acting to maintain order and punish those who harm society.

Historical and Scholarly Context

  • Many scholars interpret "bearing the sword" as the government's right to enforce both lesser punishments and, in context, the death penalty.

Some theologians emphasize that the church does not wield this power; it belongs uniquely to the state in matters of legal punishment. https://www.perplexity.ai/search/the-bible-mentions-that-the-st-pQTqE3qARIyv6Ic1XhqIuA
 
When someone is arrested, it means they are a criminal, right? And when the number reaches 10,000, it means there are 10,000 less criminals on the streets, and when that number is one million, it means there are that many less criminals off the streets BECAUSE THEY WERE ARRESTED.

It kind of renders the court system obsolete, don't you think?
No.

Just taking them off the streets is a good thing, but it's not enough. The judicial system has an obligation to hold them accountable for their criminal actions.
 
To answer your question, No, I don't believe there is another "thousand" waiting to take the place after the NG leaves.
There are the criminals who have yet to be caught who can commit the crimes.

Do you believe the use of the National Guard on a temporary basis is a good long-term solution to crime in cities?
If the DC police force still isn't able to contain the remaining criminals...after the NG leaves...I'm sure the President will take the necessary action. Maybe he'll fire the police leadership and bring the NG back.
 
No.

Just taking them off the streets is a good thing, but it's not enough. The judicial system has an obligation to hold them accountable for their criminal actions.
Why? Trump simply declares a person an illegal immigrant and off they go. No need to bother the judicial folks.

Perhaps you're referring to that old fashioned notion that the state is obligated to prove their case with evidence and witnesses. That's always been a hinderance to effective law and order and Trump has figured out a work around.
 
If the DC police force still isn't able to contain the remaining criminals...after the NG leaves...I'm sure the President will take the necessary action. Maybe he'll fire the police leadership and bring the NG back.
Why cut funding for the DC law enforcement?


The Trump administration plans to cut millions in security funding for Washington, D.C., despite the president also directing federal law enforcement to increase its presence in the city because of its "totally out of control" crime.
 
Why? Trump simply declares a person an illegal immigrant and off they go. No need to bother the judicial folks.

Perhaps you're referring to that old fashioned notion that the state is obligated to prove their case with evidence and witnesses. That's always been a hinderance to effective law and order and Trump has figured out a work around.

yep.

is this another effect of Dark Maga Technocracy, efficiency in Law Enforcement; bang you are all gone. then next problem?

 
If it works, the people of DC might learn it is possible to live with safety and security if they elect leaders based on competence instead of DEI checkboxes.
But America elected off competence there’d never be another Trumper elected to office again! 😂
 
I think I read somewhere they've taken a thousand criminals off the streets so far. If the NG left today, that means there's a thousand less criminal roaming around DC.

Do you think there's another thousand people waiting to take their place as soon as the NG leaves?
Have they been tried and found guilty in a court of law? You are innocent until proven guilty.
 
How did you come up with this gem?
Fox?

Good God
Taking crime off the streets with more policing is a practical objective.
What's wrong with that? What do you have against the National Guard?
Are you paying for it personally?
 
I think I read somewhere they've taken a thousand criminals off the streets so far. If the NG left today, that means there's a thousand less criminal roaming around DC.
At least at the moment. Depending in which court those cases land, may also turn out that those 1 thousand criminals would be turned lose on the streets again, ending up right where we started.
<sigh>

Do you think there's another thousand people waiting to take their place as soon as the NG leaves?
 
Last edited:
Have they been tried and found guilty in a court of law? You are innocent until proven guilty.
It isn't the job of the police or, in this case, the NG to determine guilt or innocence.
 
At least at the moment. Depending in which court those cases land, may also turn out that those 1 thousand criminals would be turned lose on the streets again, ending up right where we started.
<sigh>
True.
 
Taking crime off the streets with more policing is a practical objective.
What's wrong with that? What do you have against the National Guard?
Are you paying for it personally?

This is NOT what is happening.

Read, learn, use critical thinking, be objective.

Tell tourists where the bathroom is on the national mall is not adressing crime.
 
Taking crime off the streets with more policing is a practical objective.
What's wrong with that? What do you have against the National Guard?
Are you paying for it personally?
Draconian measures for law enforcement are the hallmark of totalitarian dictatorships.

Just think how you would be feeling if Obama had ordered federal troops on the streets of Memphis, TN, for no obvious reason- saying he just wanted to be practical and help take some more crime off the streets. What's the matter, you don't want crime taken off the streets?
 
Draconian measures for law enforcement are the hallmark of totalitarian dictatorships.

Just think how you would be feeling if Obama had ordered federal troops on the streets of Memphis, TN, for no obvious reason- saying he just wanted to be practical and help take some more crime off the streets. What's the matter, you don't want crime taken off the streets?

Your response is my response to you:
What's the matter, you don't want crime taken off the streets?

If it doesn't work, it doesn't work.

Are you actually suggesting Trump is totalitarian leader?
Does that mean you won't for him in 2028?
 
This is NOT what is happening.

Read, learn, use critical thinking, be objective.

Tell tourists where the bathroom is on the national mall is not adressing crime.
I am objective.
If crime goes down while the NG is there, then what is that a result of?
More policing or just dumb luck?
What will the statistics reveal? Who gets to decide? Liberals or the party in control?
 
Back
Top Bottom