- Joined
- Jan 28, 2006
- Messages
- 51,123
- Reaction score
- 15,261
- Location
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Re: What grade does the Brady Campaign gibe your state?
Like you just said, it’s a just infringement. The right to liberty is not absolute; it is not a sovereign power of the individual.
Oh, sorry I thought you were making the argument that the right to keep and bear arms applied to every weapon under the sun. My bad.
I don't have the case law handy but I do know that felons are denied their 2nd amendment rights on the grounds that they are a significant danger to the public; though policies in this regard can very. The compelling state interest here would be in protecting the populace.
...Except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted....
What's your point? Jailing people for crimes is the result of due process, the standard necessary for removing people's liberties as set by the 6th amendment. Being jailed isnt an infringement of your right to liberty, as you lose your right to liberty once you are convicted of a crime.
Like you just said, it’s a just infringement. The right to liberty is not absolute; it is not a sovereign power of the individual.
This isn't an 'allowance for infringement', its a discussion of the defintion of the right to arms, specifically, what arms are covered by the 2nd. Within that definition -- that is, as long as the weapons in question qualify as 'arms' -- the right cannot be infringed.
WMDs do not qualify as 'arms', and so there is no Constitutional issue with laws that forbiut their posession, require their rgistration, etc
Rifles, etc, DO qualify as 'arms', and so there IS a Constitutional issue with laws that forbid their posession, require their registration, etc
Given that legitimate militia do not need any official attachment to the state, how can that be?
Oh, sorry I thought you were making the argument that the right to keep and bear arms applied to every weapon under the sun. My bad.
I don't have the case law handy but I do know that felons are denied their 2nd amendment rights on the grounds that they are a significant danger to the public; though policies in this regard can very. The compelling state interest here would be in protecting the populace.