Stanford students sometimes seem to think that their intelligence is a bubble protecting them from idiocy. But as we learned again at the ASSU Senate meeting on Tuesday night, anti-Semitism, though stupid, is not the sole provenance of stupid people.
Many of today’s college students may feel confident that anti-Semitism died with Hitler. But the Oxford University Labour Club’s co-chair recently resigned to protest raging anti-Semitism on campus, and Stanford is not immune from stupid statements and prejudiced words. For Jews, anti-Semitism is terrifyingly real. And it came to a head at Stanford on Wednesday night.
Crude anti-Semitism is all the rage in academe these days. This is a case in point. We used to boggle at the stupidity of Nazi 'race science', but now it has found a home here in America. We should be ashamed and alarmed.
Crude anti-Semitism is all the rage in academe these days. This is a case in point. We used to boggle at the stupidity of Nazi 'race science', but now it has found a home here in America. We should be ashamed and alarmed.
Crude anti-Semitism is all the rage in academe these days. This is a case in point. We used to boggle at the stupidity of Nazi 'race science', but now it has found a home here in America. We should be ashamed and alarmed.
First, we need a clarification of terms. An anti-Semite is a goy, usually but not necessarily a Christian, who dares to utter any criticism, however slight, of the Jews. Another good definition is that an anti-Semite is a goy who is aware that the Jews hate his people.
Now, it's never really possible (or even desirable to the Jews) to eliminate "anti-semitism" because people will always slip up and forget to grovel when appropriate, such is the nature of political correctness. Of course, this actually benefits the Jewish victim hood racket, since it allows them (and their lackeys, dumb goy do most of the brunt work in enforcing Jew-worship) to create this sense of constant paranoia, as you are doing now.
Y'know, you can't just make up false definitions to suit your agenda. Anti
Umm...you forgot to post a link to your citation and at least some statement of what occurred at Stanford "ASSU meeting on Tuesday night" demonstrating anti-Semitism.
It's not like everyone follows the actions of Stanford's Student Union religiously for breaking world news. :coffeepap:
I've never seen a thread begin with so little context and source material.
this is actually a well written article
On Gabriel Knight and what anti-Semitism really means | Stanford Daily
this is actually a well written article
On Gabriel Knight and what anti-Semitism really means | Stanford Daily
My definition is basically correct, in terms of how the term is actually used in public discourse.
First, we need a clarification of terms. An anti-Semite is a goy, usually but not necessarily a Christian, who dares to utter any criticism, however slight, of the Jews. Another good definition is that an anti-Semite is a goy who is aware that the Jews hate his people.
Now, it's never really possible (or even desirable to the Jews) to eliminate "anti-semitism" because people will always slip up and forget to grovel when appropriate, such is the nature of political correctness. Of course, this actually benefits the Jewish victim hood racket, since it allows them (and their lackeys, dumb goy do most of the brunt work in enforcing Jew-worship) to create this sense of constant paranoia, as you are doing now.
Living up to that CT, I see.
Your definition is a complete lie.
Living up to that CT, I see.
"You're wrong" is not an argument.
Yes, I do utter criticisms of the Jews. The way people respond when I do so proves the point, it's not possible to utter any criticism of the Jews without being called an anti-Semite.
It's always interesting (and horrifying) to see anti-Semitic Christians.
Christianity by its very nature is "anti-semitic", because it calls for the Jews to cease to reject Christ, and embrace his truth.
Christianity by its very nature is "anti-semitic", because it calls for the Jews to cease to reject Christ, and embrace his truth.
My definition is basically correct, in terms of how the term is actually used in public discourse.
"You're wrong" is not an argument.
Yes, I do utter criticisms of the Jews. The way people respond when I do so proves the point, it's not possible to utter any criticism of the Jews without being called an anti-Semite.
You speak for no "Christian" but yourself. Don't even presume to speak for me.
You have a funny idea of what anti-Semitic is and what scripture calls for -- hint, it's not Antisemitism.
Your definition shows complete ignorance of the original definition.
"You're wrong" is a statement of fact. Defining an anti-Semite as "a goy who is aware that the Jews hate his people" is, to be charitable, not correct.
"The Jews" this, and "the Jews" that assumes that...oh, never mind.
Would you consider the statement "The Jews hate white people" anti-semitic?
and indeed it was not even used. What was said is that your argument is a lie."You're wrong" is not an argument.
Anti-Semitism is essentially "Racist/Prejudice/Bigotry Against Jews". It's not really different than racism/prejudice/bigory against any other race/group/religion/group of people, but it simply has a specific name for it.
It's not necessarily the most accurate word when taken literally, much like homophobia, but the intent and colloquial meaning of the word is obvious and an accurate one.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?