• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Western Kentucky Professor: Trump's victory signals that human decency is no longer an American virtue

You will be! :mad: Or else!
Those who threaten others while themselves lacking official approval for the issuance of threats will be dealt with severely for their infringement on the power of The Leader.

Govern yourself accordingly.

1733238861812.webp
 
Now we're in the "But Biden" phase.

Nobody is as corrupt and morally bankrupt as Trump. There's no competition.
Biden certainly is.

You just deny it because all you know about politics is your political tribe.
 
Biden certainly is.

You just deny it because all you know about politics is your political tribe.
Last time I checked I am a registered Republican with center-right beliefs. But yeah, it is easy to pin me as a liberal or a Democrat nowadays.

I agree that Biden is no saint, but re-electing Donald Trump is a new level of moral indecency.
 
Last time I checked I am a registered Republican with center-right beliefs. But yeah, it is easy to pin me as a liberal or a Democrat nowadays.

I agree that Biden is no saint, but re-electing Donald Trump is a new level of moral indecency.
I am taking the late Clayton Williams approach to rape, with regards Trump being reelected.
 
“Before November 5th, for example, many of us were under the impression human kindness was a quality that defined our society.”

LOL. He must have been born about 5 minutes before he wrote that article.
Admission.
 
His opponent wasn't/isn't a shitty person. Trump defines shitty person.
She was a shitty candidate. Whether or not she was a shitty person is a matter of personal observation, though I don’t have an opinion on that one way or the other.
 
She was a shitty candidate. Whether or not she was a shitty person is a matter of personal observation, though I don’t have an opinion on that one way or the other.
I think you've missed the point here.
 
Harris is not a shit person. Trump is. He is a reflection of us.
Correct. Harris does have dark patches in her record, but nothing coming close to Trump. If morality was an issue for voting, Trump would have never won the popular vote, electoral college, and carried 31 states.
 
Correct. Harris does have dark patches in her record, but nothing coming close to Trump. If morality was an issue for voting, Trump would have never won the popular vote, electoral college, and carried 31 states.
AMEN
 
She was a shitty candidate. Whether or not she was a shitty person is a matter of personal observation, though I don’t have an opinion on that one way or the other.
The conversation is about morality, and whether it still matters. That was the point of the article. Trump is a candidate with a history of sexual misconduct, fraud, provoking violence and chaos, lying, and committing slander.

This is not a conversation about Harris. It's a question about how Americans view morality.
 
Time to repack my bug-out bag and leave it by the door again. :(
Yes, standing by your door with your permitted one suitcase already packed when the government chauffeur

1733240795306.webp

arrives to take you to your new residence so that you can take advantage of the free, government approved, educational opportunity t is always considered to be a sign of "Good Thought".
 
Elevating elected officials to the level of hero or role model generally ends up badly. Find better role models. All the election of Trump proved was what a horrible candidate Harris was.
I don't know. I don't think that she was that horrible of a candidate. The three states that swung the most from blue to red weren't battleground states.
 
Correct. Harris does have dark patches in her record, but nothing coming close to Trump. If morality was an issue for voting, Trump would have never won the popular vote, electoral college, and carried 31 states.
The

"Yeah, I know, he's a terrible person who I wouldn't leave alone with either my family silver or any of my female relatives and he's probably about as corrupt as they come while being more than willing to sell out the whole country if there is a dime in profit in it for him,, but DAMMIT he says that he's going to reduce the price of a loaf of beer by a nickle and that's good enough for me."​

folks certainly did elect their preferred candidate.
 
The conversation is about morality, and whether it still matters. That was the point of the article. Trump is a candidate with a history of sexual misconduct, fraud, provoking violence and chaos, lying, and committing slander.

This is not a conversation about Harris. It's a question about how Americans view morality.
Of course it’s a conversation about Harris. How can you justify Trump being elected without looking at who he was running against? Trump’s election was less a comment about the morality of America as it was a comparison of two horrible candidates that in normal times wouldn’t be anywhere near a ballot.
 
You can read the full article here. Here are some snippets on key points:

This is a terrific, but sad great read. Quite frankly, I cannot disagree with a single word he wrote. Do you guys think human decency is dead?

ROFL; another Marxist melting down. The hypocrisy in just what was posted in the OP is astounding.
 
Back
Top Bottom