We're Number One, We're Number One.

[Jack Hays]

Amazing, every single part of this post is wrong.

I'm surprised you know so little.

 

[Jack Hays]

Jack has been posting false narratives for as long as I can remember.

Yeah but this was three wrong things in two sentences. Unusual efficiency.

You two are sharing your ignorance.

 

[calamity]

You two are sharing your ignorance.

No, we are sharing your ignorance.

 

[Jack Hays]

No, we are sharing your ignorance.

So far I don't see any attempt to refute my statement or provide contrary evidence.

 

[Deuce]

So far I don't see any attempt to refute my statement or provide contrary evidence.

You want me to provide evidence to counter two sentences of opinion? Why should I do that? I gotta write five paragraphs with supporting links from experts for every random ass thought you spew onto a message board? No. Not how this works. You want to go with a battle of evidence, post some.

 

[Jack Hays]

You want me to provide evidence to counter two sentences of opinion? Why should I do that? I gotta write five paragraphs with supporting links from experts for every random ass thought you spew onto a message board? No. Not how this works. You want to go with a battle of evidence, post some.

My statement stands because it's true. You think it's not, then explain why. The reason you don't is because you can't.

 

[Deuce]

My statement stands because it's true. You think it's not, then explain why. The reason you don't is because you can't.

My statement (where I called your statement wrong) stands because it's true. You think it's not, then explain why. The reason you don't is because you can't.

 

[Jack Hays]

My statement (where I called your statement wrong) stands because it's true. You think it's not, then explain why. The reason you don't is because you can't.

Sorry, but it doesn't work that way. Your objection brought about the dispute. The burden of proof is yours.

 

[calamity]

Sorry, but it doesn't work that way. Your objection brought about the dispute. The burden of proof is yours.

It's wrong because the warming you deny is real and happening right before our eyes. So, in a sense, and for reasons none of us understands, you are pushing some sort of Orwellian garbage that thankfully no one with a brain is buying.

 

[Jack Hays]

It's wrong because the warming you deny is real and happening right before our eyes. So, in a sense, and for reasons none of us understands, you are pushing some sort of Orwellian garbage that thankfully no one with a brain is buying.

The statement under dispute had nothing to do with warming.

 

[Deuce]

Sorry, but it doesn't work that way. Your objection brought about the dispute. The burden of proof is yours.

No, you made the assertion. The burden of proof is yours.

 

[calamity]

The statement under dispute had nothing to do with warming.

Everything you post in these threads has to do with warming, mostly your denial of the science thereof.

 

[Jack Hays]

No, you made the assertion. The burden of proof is yours.

Nope. You're the plaintiff. You brought the case; have at it. If you don't care to support your claim (or can't) I'm happy to go on my way. I regard the truth of my statement as self-evident.

 

[Checkerboard Strangler]

"Proper enviro-regs" are not implemented or enforced. The amount of methane released is so poorly monitored that the EPA straight up doesn't know how much is entering the atmosphere.

EPA? I was not talking about enviro-regs on fracking over here...that's what the Halliburton Loophole is about. There ARE NO EPAv fracking regs here.

Europe...I was talking about EUROPE. The United States Environmental Protection Agency doesn't have jurisdiction in Europe.
And sorry but European regulations are enforced, to the point where the current administration wants to interfere.

 

[Jack Hays]

Everything you post in these threads has to do with warming, mostly your denial of the science thereof.

I suggest you read more and post less.

 

[Deuce]

Nope. You're the plaintiff. You brought the case; have at it. If you don't care to support your claim (or can't) I'm happy to go on my way. I regard the truth of my statement as self-evident.

I regard the truth of my statement as self-evidence. If you don't care to support your claim, I'm happy to go on my way.

 

[Jack Hays]

I regard the truth of my statement as self-evidence. If you don't care to support your claim, I'm happy to go on my way.

So long.