- Joined
- Nov 28, 2014
- Messages
- 64,478
- Reaction score
- 20,027
That is a conundrum. Have you tried Walmart?<sigh> But I really need that chocolate flavored protein powder and I need it by 5 o'clock this afternoon - I can't wait.
That is a conundrum. Have you tried Walmart?<sigh> But I really need that chocolate flavored protein powder and I need it by 5 o'clock this afternoon - I can't wait.
I have a question. Amazon has an incredible amount of content we all paid for, stored in its cloud. Movies, books, lists, data, etc. For things like movies, music, books, etc...I guess I'm not clear who actually owns it. I do mean purchased, not streamed. For instance, I have purchased thousands of Kindle books, some are downloaded on my Kindle, and some are stored in Amazon's cloud.
What happens to that content if:
Amazon goes under, is split up, is challenged by content owners en masse politically, is taken over by the govt, etc etc?Can Amazon or the govt hold our content hostage? Delete it all? Use it for leverage?
Has anyone else ever wondered what happens to our content if somehow Amazon "ceased to exist?" Unlikely hypothetical I know but...?
WaPo is. "Democracy dies in darkness" their masthead proclaims, as they silence dissent.That not apparent at all. Nobody is stopping her from speaking freely.
It’s always pissed me off that I cannot recycle my Kindle books!I have a question. Amazon has an incredible amount of content we all paid for, stored in its cloud. Movies, books, lists, data, etc. For things like movies, music, books, etc...I guess I'm not clear who actually owns it. I do mean purchased, not streamed. For instance, I have purchased thousands of Kindle books, some are downloaded on my Kindle, and some are stored in Amazon's cloud.
What happens to that content if:
Amazon goes under, is split up, is challenged by content owners en masse politically, is taken over by the govt, etc etc?Can Amazon or the govt hold our content hostage? Delete it all? Use it for leverage?
Has anyone else ever wondered what happens to our content if somehow Amazon "ceased to exist?" Unlikely hypothetical I know but...?
Marxists get very triggered when you shine a light on them.
Marxists get very triggered when you shine a light on them.
Cloud content has value. If Amazon disappeared someone would take over that content.
Lol, good one.No. You’re thinking of vampires.
Depends. Probably somewhere in your ToS.
Marxists get very triggered when you shine a light on them.
Nice try.Nope. People are 'triggered' when they are labeled as minions of a philosophy that the vast majority of those accused don't agree or comply with.
Some of us have problems controlling our laughter as yet another non-thinker shows their ignorance about Marxism, Communism, Stalinism, Socialism and all of the many political philosophies that humanity has followed thru the centuries.
That not apparent at all. Nobody is stopping her from speaking freely.
Nice try.
Bezos is today learning about the Streisand Effect.True, the problem being that Ms Telnaes no longer has the microphone on the stage that is the Washington Post. Until she has a job with another media outlet with an audience as large as the Post's, she has been effectively silenced.
Bezos is today learning about the Streisand Effect.
Telnaes' cartoon will be far more disseminated now than if it only appeared in the newspaper.
While banging away on your keyboard?You are correct. I had not thought about the platform that is our modern internet.
The RWE of this forum firmly believe Bezos is “of the left” and Trump is an independent, white knight “swamp drainer” working on their behalf’The cartoon hit a little too close to home for Mr. Bezos.
Marxist vampires <shudder>No. You’re thinking of vampires.
No they aren't. The only thing they are doing is declining to publish her opinion. That is not what you are trying to claim it to be. The WaPo has no obligation to amplify her opinions. That is their choice.WaPo is. "Democracy dies in darkness" their masthead proclaims, as they silence dissent.
Libs are truly astonishing in their ignorance. Wow.The RWE of this forum firmly believe Bezos is “of the left” and Trump is an independent, white knight “swamp drainer” working on their behalf’
After all, Murdoch owned media properties are their MSM “go to guys” keeping conned, culted MAGA “infirmed”.
![]()
Jones Day Jumps Back Into Trump-Related Litigation for GOP (2)
Jones Day is edging its way into the legal fight to send Donald Trump back to the White House, even after the powerful Washington firm distanced itself from the former president.news.bloomberglaw.com
Post Citizens United v. F.E.C., in 2017, con man Trump enters the White House flanked by eleven lawyers of Jones, Day.
Confirmation U.S. is a thugocracy? This name has never appeared @DP Forum. "Whatever you do to the least of my people, you do to me."
https://www.rawstory.com/don-mcgahn-jones-day/ August 25, 2022 "...McGahn had been personally responsible for picking Trump's judges, whose ranks he filled with conservatives approved by the Federalist Society, and gutting the administrative state, but less than six months into the job he was...debatepolitics.com
To put that in prrspective, the wealth of the bottom 170 million is $3.8 trillion. Not 38,
3.8 …
The Fed - Distribution: Distribution of Household Wealth in the U.S. since 1989
The Federal Reserve Board of Governors in Washington DC.www.federalreserve.gov
![]()
Leonard Leo - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
Citizens United v. FEC - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
Reality says otherwise. When you buy a paper you can run it however you wish.If your job is to poke fun at power, there should be no sacred cows, no matter who they are.
No they aren't. The only thing they are doing is declining to publish her opinion. That is not what you are trying to claim it to be. The WaPo has no obligation to amplify her opinions. That is their choice.
Jeff Bezos (current net worth 234.2 billion) and the rest of the oligarchy thanks you for your unwavering support.No they aren't. The only thing they are doing is declining to publish her opinion. That is not what you are trying to claim it to be. The WaPo has no obligation to amplify her opinions. That is their choice.