• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Washington Post Cartoonist Quits After Jeff Bezos Cartoon Is Killed

I have a question. Amazon has an incredible amount of content we all paid for, stored in its cloud. Movies, books, lists, data, etc. For things like movies, music, books, etc...I guess I'm not clear who actually owns it. I do mean purchased, not streamed. For instance, I have purchased thousands of Kindle books, some are downloaded on my Kindle, and some are stored in Amazon's cloud.

What happens to that content if:

Amazon goes under, is split up, is challenged by content owners en masse politically, is taken over by the govt, etc etc?​
Can Amazon or the govt hold our content hostage? Delete it all? Use it for leverage?​

Has anyone else ever wondered what happens to our content if somehow Amazon "ceased to exist?" Unlikely hypothetical I know but...?

IMG_1287.webp
 
I have a question. Amazon has an incredible amount of content we all paid for, stored in its cloud. Movies, books, lists, data, etc. For things like movies, music, books, etc...I guess I'm not clear who actually owns it. I do mean purchased, not streamed. For instance, I have purchased thousands of Kindle books, some are downloaded on my Kindle, and some are stored in Amazon's cloud.

What happens to that content if:

Amazon goes under, is split up, is challenged by content owners en masse politically, is taken over by the govt, etc etc?​
Can Amazon or the govt hold our content hostage? Delete it all? Use it for leverage?​

Has anyone else ever wondered what happens to our content if somehow Amazon "ceased to exist?" Unlikely hypothetical I know but...?
It’s always pissed me off that I cannot recycle my Kindle books!
 
Cloud content has value. If Amazon disappeared someone would take over that content.

We paid for the content. But yes, someone could take over storage. And then the costs could be anything. And it could be withheld. AFAIK, there are no obligations to Amazon to access your personal content in their cloud.
 
Marxists get very triggered when you shine a light on them.

Nope. People are 'triggered' when they are labeled as minions of a philosophy that the vast majority of those accused don't agree or comply with.

Some of us have problems controlling our laughter as yet another non-thinker shows their ignorance about Marxism, Communism, Stalinism, Socialism and all of the many political philosophies that humanity has followed thru the centuries.
 
Nope. People are 'triggered' when they are labeled as minions of a philosophy that the vast majority of those accused don't agree or comply with.

Some of us have problems controlling our laughter as yet another non-thinker shows their ignorance about Marxism, Communism, Stalinism, Socialism and all of the many political philosophies that humanity has followed thru the centuries.
Nice try.
 
That not apparent at all. Nobody is stopping her from speaking freely.

True, the problem being that Ms Telnaes no longer has the microphone on the stage that is the Washington Post. Until she has a job with another media outlet with an audience as large as the Post's, she has been effectively silenced.
 
True, the problem being that Ms Telnaes no longer has the microphone on the stage that is the Washington Post. Until she has a job with another media outlet with an audience as large as the Post's, she has been effectively silenced.
Bezos is today learning about the Streisand Effect.

Telnaes' cartoon will be far more disseminated now than if it only appeared in the newspaper.
 
The cartoon hit a little too close to home for Mr. Bezos.
The RWE of this forum firmly believe Bezos is “of the left” and Trump is an independent, white knight “swamp drainer” working on their behalf’

After all, Murdoch owned media properties are their MSM “go to guys” keeping conned, culted MAGA “informed”.

October 29, 2024

Post Citizens United v. F.E.C., in 2017, con man Trump enters the White House flanked by eleven lawyers of Jones, Day.


To put that in prrspective, the wealth of the bottom 170 million is $3.8 trillion. Not 38,
3.8 …

The wealth of the wealthiest top one percent, 3,400,000 residents, is $49.3 trillion.


 
Last edited:
WaPo is. "Democracy dies in darkness" their masthead proclaims, as they silence dissent.
No they aren't. The only thing they are doing is declining to publish her opinion. That is not what you are trying to claim it to be. The WaPo has no obligation to amplify her opinions. That is their choice.
 
The RWE of this forum firmly believe Bezos is “of the left” and Trump is an independent, white knight “swamp drainer” working on their behalf’

After all, Murdoch owned media properties are their MSM “go to guys” keeping conned, culted MAGA “infirmed”.


Post Citizens United v. F.E.C., in 2017, con man Trump enters the White House flanked by eleven lawyers of Jones, Day.


To put that in prrspective, the wealth of the bottom 170 million is $3.8 trillion. Not 38,
3.8 …



Libs are truly astonishing in their ignorance. Wow.
 
If your job is to poke fun at power, there should be no sacred cows, no matter who they are.
Reality says otherwise. When you buy a paper you can run it however you wish.
 
No they aren't. The only thing they are doing is declining to publish her opinion. That is not what you are trying to claim it to be. The WaPo has no obligation to amplify her opinions. That is their choice.

Of course they can deny her. That doesnt mean the decision isnt completely hypocritical according to their mast head. 🤷 And pointing out this hypocrisy is a means to an end itself. (y) An "opportunity."
 
No they aren't. The only thing they are doing is declining to publish her opinion. That is not what you are trying to claim it to be. The WaPo has no obligation to amplify her opinions. That is their choice.
Jeff Bezos (current net worth 234.2 billion) and the rest of the oligarchy thanks you for your unwavering support.
 
Back
Top Bottom