Bush didn't tell any more untruths about Iraq than his predecessor, his predecessor's administration, and high ranking Democrats did.
We have a different definition of 'effective'.
Even assuming Bush and his predecessor said the same thing (they didn't), the BA shovelled more of it on the American people during a vulnerable time, in order to achieve an agenda.
I don't like to beat on Bush. It's old. But lets stop pretending that Carter, Obama, etc. are in the same league as him just because they're Democrats. They're not. Bush was a horrible, disastrous president. If you supported him, you were hoodwinked. Just accept it, and go back to bashing Obama over edited memos.
Even assuming Bush and his predecessor said the same thing (they didn't), the BA shovelled more of it on the American people during a vulnerable time, in order to achieve an agenda.
I don't like to beat on Bush. It's old. But lets stop pretending that Carter, Obama, etc. are in the same league as him just because they're Democrats. They're not. Bush was a horrible, disastrous president. If you supported him, you were hoodwinked. Just accept it, and go back to bashing Obama over edited memos.
Was George W Bush a good president?
It was Clinton who signed a law calling for regime change in Iraq.
Kill the people who put them there before they put them there.
I don't know if you have called Obama a liar.
That's been one of the complaints about the current rules of engagement, if an American soldiers sees someone carrying an explosive device or burying an IED along a roadway, they can't open fire and kill that person unless they are actually being shot at.
About 100,000 Iraqis died in Bush's war in Iraq.
Right now the relatives and fellow tribesmen of those people are looking for some payback.
Think about it.
Lets see there is oen: Saddam Hussein's Support for International Terrorism That is literally where word for word your info came from.
[/COLOR][/B]
That's a bad policy and should be changed.
Those bomb-planters are valid targets and they should be taken out before they do their dirty work.
And the majority of the dead Iraqis were killed by fellow Iraqis and Muslims, not by Americans.
My answer is the exact same if the question was about Obama...
:lamo:lamo:lamo:lamo:lamo
NO!!!
That's your opinion, which most Americans don't share- they sent Obama back to the White House for a second term.
Who started the fighting in Iraq and where did the guns and bullets for those killings come from?
That's who the Iraqis blame.
The intelligence never existed, and what intelligence they did have they knew was unreliable. You're certainly giving a lot of leeway to Bush, when it comes to burden of proof. Do you afford the same to Obama?
Okay.
If you call Obama a liar, but not Bush, then we have an example of setting different standards and different goal posts. I don't know if you have called Obama a liar. Have you?
Never said you were.
Buchanan only screwed up america not the whole world for a 100 years like bush.
Or Harding, Coolidge, or Grant.
Was George W Bush a good president?
How do you know what other people knew or did not know? Simple answer to that question is you do not. I'm giving leeway to no one.
Okay what? That's all you have to say? For someone who goes out of his way to be an instigator, I would think you would have more to say on the matter.
What exactly is it that you are looking to hear? Sorry that people just don't see things your way.
Incredibly passive-aggressive. You implied just that, yet apparently are too cowardly to come out with your own true feelings.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?