• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Was calling for Mike Pence's hanging by Jan 6th participants a call for violence?

Was calling for Mike Pence's hanging by Jan 6th participants a call for violence?

  • Yes

  • No


Results are only viewable after voting.
Far less violent than the majority of the rhetoric

So then calling for Mike Pence's hanging is a call to violence? I am glad you finally agree with those more level headed than you.

Welcome back to reality! One step at a time.

😁
 
So then calling for Mike Pence's hanging is a call to violence?

Lying again.

Credibility is where political rhetoric crosses into violence.

This is NOT a credible threat to hang anyone.

AD_4nXev4eWfbABH_zoSE8gqw184-Q7FNi_F2ZReirBWUarQcScNR7CB84v9r91vdMOqWC2yiCrpwallKJmVoDYkQ_ZwaySZMKejAQgZQILPZ0iSzK0RS__1d386dn3nsAfKCZjEitc5tTWMsT1aN2jD42W5VHx4


The claim otherwise is not just dishonest, but idiocy.
I am glad you finally agree with those more level headed than you.

Welcome back to reality! One step at a time.

😁

You try so hard, but fail so profoundly.

Look, you hate Trump, we get it. You'll say anything to slander and defame him, we get it. You don't care that what you claim is untrue, we get it.
 
Is calling for Mike Pence's hanging a call for violence?



Come on, claim it didn't happen.

😄

I leave the lying to you, you're so good at it.

What I said is that it is not a credible threat. Which you know, but choose to be less than honest about.
 
No. It was not a call to violence - any more than former FBI Director James Comey's "8647" in sea shells was a call to violence.

Calling for Pence's hanging was stupid and callous, by a group of bad actors. They never expected or even hoped that Pence would be hung. Likewise, Comey's calling for 47 to be 86ed was stupid and callous, as Comey is a bad actor. Comey doesn't expect someone to actually 86 47.
Both Sidesing this, in such a manner is ****ing insane.
 
I leave the lying to you, you're so good at it.

Say calling for Mike Pence's hanging didn't happen. I want you to call that a lie. We already know that even if it did, you do not think it is a call to violence.

Come on. Show us how removed from reality you are.

😃
 
I actually showed pictures, so that even democrats can follow along.
Pictures cannot show reasoned arguments, which is why Republicans have to use them. They are like fingerpaints for toddlers. They can mean anything at all. Republicans will tell you the pictures mean whatever it it is they are selling. The reason we teach toddlers how to read is to teach them how to reason. You Republicans should try it.
 
More facts than you have lies, which is why you come out on the short side.
You'll have to quote my lies , and you'll have to post something true.
 
@Uncensored2008 and @SkyChief want people to believe that the ONLY place Mike Pence could have been hung from if those J6 terrorists got him is that makeshift mock gallow built by the retards and no OTHER place.

As such, because the makeshift mock gallows was useless for hanging people, no call or effort to violently harm Mike Pence was made.

It is a fantastically stupid premise and I am happy people see right through it.

😆
 
Today's GOP: "86" doesn't mean "kill or "assassinate" when Republicans use it against a Democrat. "Hang Pence" doesn't mean "kill" or "assassinate" when MAGA uses it against a person who has stood up to trump.
 
Inspired by the most recent right wing outrage concerning "8647", I, Hatuey wondered :



Since they received pardons it is clear some people do not think it was a call to violence. What say the good people of Debate Politics? Come cry if you need to..

😅

Lol MAGA hates to be reminded how 1-6 jerkoffs threatened the Vice President because yes, it was a call for violence.
 
Inspired by the most recent right wing outrage concerning "8647", I, Hatuey wondered :



Since they received pardons it is clear some people do not think it was a call to violence. What say the good people of Debate Politics? Come cry if you need to..

😅
They had a mock gallows and such, but I don't see it any differently than when protestors had burned Presidents in effigy, it's mostly just an expression of speech in and of itself. And had MAGAs not formed a violent, armed mob and attacked Congress in an act of sedition against the Republic that day, that's about all we would be saying about it.
 
You'll have to quote my lies , and you'll have to post something true.
BWAHAHAHAHA

Good one. You should replace the hate night goons on TV, at least you're funny -unintentionally, but still funny..
 
Pictures cannot show reasoned arguments,

They do a damned good job of exposing hypocrisy...

which is why Republicans have to use them. They are like fingerpaints for toddlers.

We have to understand our intended audience. Though it looks like it still went over the heads of the board lefties.
They can mean anything at all. Republicans will tell you the pictures mean whatever it it is they are selling.

Zat right?

Give me your interpretation of the picture to deliberately ignored - other than the one any two year old can see..

A picture containing text, indoor, person, clothes  Description automatically generated


Yeah, you'll duck or obfuscate...
The reason we teach toddlers how to read is to teach them how to reason. You Republicans should try it.

Then tell you about it, since you'll never try it?
 
BWAHAHAHAHA

Good one. You should replace the hate night goons on TV, at least you're funny -unintentionally, but still funny..

Is that a dodge since you didn't find a lie to quote?
 
Is that a dodge since you didn't find a lie to quote?
What no one will find is anything true in your hate rant.

You lied in post 137 with your claim that you "saw" Trump call for people to "hang Mike Pence."
 
What no one will find is anything true in your hate rant.

I didn't say much about hate, some others have,
Unnamed sources during the Stalinist Show Trial..

ROFL

Did the anonymous sources say Trump did this AFTER or BEFORE making Matzo from the blood of democrat babies, that hadn't even been sacrificed by holy abortion?


You lied in post 137 with your claim that you "saw" Trump call for people to "hang Mike Pence."

Are you saying I, Mr. Box, was not personally participating in the riot? Or are you saying you don't think the rioters started chanting Hang Mike Pence when Trump posted this:

"Mike Pence didn’t have the courage to do what should have been done to protect our Country and our Constitution, giving States a chance to certify a corrected set of facts, not the fraudulent or inaccurate ones which they were asked to previously certify. USA demands the truth!"

Please be more specific. Did you see the video at about 1:25? I saw it.

 
This is an expression of speech?
No. People who claim that a violent mob chanting, "Hang Mike Pence" is simply a group expressing freedom of speech have no understanding of the dynamics of mob violence. Once a group has weapons and has been engaged in combat with police, they have a dynamic as a group. As a group they will do things that individuals within the group might not do on their own in less frenzied circumstances. An angry mob chanting, "Hang Mike Pence" and being on the move is a very real threat. The Senators running out of The Capitol knew that.
 
They do a damned good job of exposing hypocrisy...



We have to understand our intended audience. Though it looks like it still went over the heads of the board lefties.


Zat right?

Give me your interpretation of the picture to deliberately ignored - other than the one any two year old can see..

A picture containing text, indoor, person, clothes  Description automatically generated


Yeah, you'll duck or obfuscate...


Then tell you about it, since you'll never try it?
This is not worthy of a response.
 
Liberals are such whiners. Bless their hearts. :ROFLMAO:
 
Back
Top Bottom