• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W: #795] At least three people have been shot at the homes of Minnesota Democrats in overnight attacks by a gunman posing as cop

People In the area where the car was found reporting to have heard gunshots this morning, what are the chances those gunshots was him taking the coward’s way out?


 
Another Trump voting Even Jelly Kool "loses his cool", kills two lawmakers, injures two others.
Reports say he also owned a "security company" which of course has a few "patrol" vehicles (basically FAKE cop cars).

Remember how the toy industry had to start putting bright orange tips on fake guns, so folks would clearly know they weren't real?
I think it's time we considered doing something similar with "security" and their "security patrol cars" because we're seeing way too many people cruising around pretending to be real police officers and literally killing folks when the cheese slides off their cracker.

---A friend of Vance Boelter said he received a text message from the suspect, which read, "I’m going to be gone for a while. May be dead shortly."
Yeah right, God willing before he kills a few more people, yeah.

Should we start considering laws that require "security patrol" cars to be painted ONLY bright orange so people will KNOW that they aren't actually COP CARS?
And maybe it's also time that the UNIFORMS these people wear be mandated to be bright orange or pink or some color that clearly proves that they are NOT
actual sworn law enforcement?
I'm just spitballing here, I'm not saying security guards have to wear clown suits but something has to make it clear to people answering their door that they are not seeing "cops" when the person ISN'T a cop.
www.scrippsnews.com

Minnesota shooting suspect’s vehicle located; manhunt continues

The FBI is offering a reward of up to $50,000 for information leading to the arrest of Vance Boelter, the suspect in the shootings of two Minnesota lawmakers and their spouses.
www.scrippsnews.com www.scrippsnews.com
 
Allan said:
Click to expand...



So, Democrats were shot who sided with Republicans. So why would a Repubican shoot them?

Maybe the shooter joined the Republican Party before he shot them? At least it will look good for the feeble minded.

Lees
 
Lees said:
So, Democrats were shot who sided with Republicans. So why would a Repubican shoot them?

Maybe the shooter joined the Republican Party before he shot them? At least it will look good for the feeble minded.

Lees
Click to expand...
You applaud these murders.

Don't even try to deny it.
 
Boy, this thread SURE got quiet when the summer of love people couldn't figure out a way to blame the Democrats.

Now they wanna talk about busted circuits and mental health. Who didn't see that shit coming?

Raise your hand!

😄
 
Hamish Howl said:
You applaud these murders.

Don't even try to deny it.
Click to expand...

That's just your empty head and open mouth talking. My point was, why were they shot? They had just broke with their Democratic Party in ceratin issues.

Do you assume a Republican shot them?

And, much like the one who attempted to assassinate Trump, was said to be a member of the Republican party. How quaint.

Why would I applaud these murders?

Lees
 
Lees said:
So, Democrats were shot who sided with Republicans. So why would a Repubican shoot them?

Maybe the shooter joined the Republican Party before he shot them? At least it will look good for the feeble minded.

Lees
Click to expand...

Maybe you could reference the actual legislation so that more people will know exactly what was being voted on instead of R.A.N.'s description of the bill.
May we see the actual bill, please?
 
Lees said:
So, Democrats were shot who sided with Republicans. So why would a Repubican shoot them?

Maybe the shooter joined the Republican Party before he shot them? At least it will look good for the feeble minded.

Lees
Click to expand...

Instead of calling others feeble minded, perhaps try to actually follow and get caught up with all the facts, then you might catch on how silly your post is.

You can easily find all the actual facts throughout the thread.

For starters, it was a lie that they both sided with republicans.

IMG_2773.webp
 
Lees said:
That's just your empty head and open mouth talking. My point was, why were they shot? They had just broke with their Democratic Party in ceratin issues.

Do you assume a Republican shot them?

And, much like the one who attempted to assassinate Trump, was said to be a member of the Republican party. How quaint.

Why would I applaud these murders?

Lees
Click to expand...

@Lees they know who the murderer is, the cops SAW him leaving and he took shots at the cops as he fled.
So there is NO doubt as to who the suspect is, and the suspect is known to his own friends and neighbors, as are his political views.

Maybe you need to update your news sources.
 
Lees said:
That's just your empty head and open mouth talking.
Click to expand...
You should keep doing that.
Lees said:
Do you assume a Republican shot them?
Click to expand...
Absolutely.
Lees said:
And, much like the one who attempted to assassinate Trump, was said to be a member of the Republican party. How quaint.

Why would I applaud these murders?
Click to expand...
For the same reason you applaud slavery.
 
Emlee said:
Perhaps try to actually follow all the facts, then you might catch on how silly your post is.

You can easily find all the actual facts throughout the thread.

For starters, it was a lie that they both sided with republicans.

View attachment 67574851
Click to expand...

A few years ago Governor Newsom vetoed a California Universal Healthcare bill put up by a nurses assocation and the RW went nuts, exclaiming that Newsom actually is AGAINST UHC, when in reality the reason he vetoed the bill was because the bill was a mess.
It was poorly put together, it did not have enough financial information and it was already on the shit-list with a lot of nonprofit hospital networks AND more than a few prominent doctors.
And both the hospital networks AND the doctors made it clear they were not against UHC, just THAT particular bill.

So my point is, BOTH Hortman AND Hoffman might have voted against this bill because it was a lousy bill that wouldn't work if passed and maybe they just wanted a better piece of legislation.

Newsom also made it clear he was not against UHC, he just hated that specific bill because it wasn't a good piece of legislation.
So we all need to find out what was in the bill so we have an idea what their reasons were, or what her reason was.
 
Checkerboard Strangler said:
Maybe you could reference the actual legislation so that more people will know exactly what was being voted on instead of R.A.N.'s description of the bill.
May we see the actual bill, please?
Click to expand...

So, what Allen referenced in post #(34) is a lie?

Lees
 
Lees said:
So, what Allen referenced in post #(34) is a lie?

Lees
Click to expand...

I didn't say that.
I asked YOU to try to reference the actual bill so we can see what's in it.
There may be a lot of reasons all kinds of people voted it down but unless we know what bill it is, we're all just guessing, including @Allan , including you.

Can anybody find out what bill this was?
 
Emlee said:
Instead of calling others feeble minded, perhaps try to actually follow and get caught up with all the facts, then you might catch on how silly your post is.

You can easily find all the actual facts throughout the thread.

For starters, it was a lie that they both sided with republicans.

View attachment 67574851
Click to expand...

Is post #(34) part of this thread? Is the reference given a lie?

Lees
 
Checkerboard Strangler said:
A few years ago Governor Newsom vetoed a California Universal Healthcare bill put up by a nurses assocation and the RW went nuts, exclaiming that Newsom actually is AGAINST UHC, when in reality the reason he vetoed the bill was because the bill was a mess.
It was poorly put together, it did not have enough financial information and it was already on the shit-list with a lot of nonprofit hospital networks AND more than a few prominent doctors.
And both the hospital networks AND the doctors made it clear they were not against UHC, just THAT particular bill.

So my point is, BOTH Hortman AND Hoffman might have voted against this bill because it was a lousy bill that wouldn't work if passed and maybe they just wanted a better piece of legislation.

Newsom also made it clear he was not against UHC, he just hated that specific bill because it wasn't a good piece of legislation.
So we all need to find out what was in the bill so we have an idea what their reasons were, or what her reason was.
Click to expand...


It was confirmed though that Hoffman was the only one to have voted for it and that Hoffman voted against it.

————-

No evidence linking shootings to vote about immigrant health care​


Before a suspect was named, conservative X users circulated theories based on the lawmakers' recent votes.

The X account "Right Angle News Network," which purports to share reliable conservative news, posted that Hortman and Hoffman "both recently voted against their party, with Hortman supporting repeal of free healthcare for illegals and Hoffman joining Republicans in the Senate to pass it."

That post was wrong.

Although Hortman was the only Democrat who voted with Republicans to pass a budget bill that will remove adult immigrants in the U.S. illegally from the state's MinnesotaCare health program, Hoffman voted against the bill that would end such coverage.

After an hour, Right Angle News Network posted a correction.

But X users reposted the claims and Grok, X's artificial intelligence tool, repeated the falsehood about Hoffman. And some, including Collin Rugg, co-owner of conservative news site TrendingPolitics, theorized on X that Hortman's vote was linked to her killing.

www.pbs.org

Fact-checking unsubstantiated claims linking Gov. Walz to Minnesota lawmakers' shootings

In 2019, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz reappointed the suspect wanted in connection with the shooting of Minnesota state legislators to a workforce development board. Conservatives baselessly said that implicated Walz in the killing.
www.pbs.org www.pbs.org
 
Hamish Howl said:
People that have one odious belief will often have other odious beliefs.
Click to expand...

Oh, I see...just like people who when the mouth moves the brain is disconnected are likely to constantly spew shit. As I have told you before, Normally closed contacts.

Lees
 
Emlee said:
It was confirmed though that Hoffman was the only one to have voted for it and that Hoffman voted against it.

————-

No evidence linking shootings to vote about immigrant health care​


Before a suspect was named, conservative X users circulated theories based on the lawmakers' recent votes.

The X account "Right Angle News Network," which purports to share reliable conservative news, posted that Hortman and Hoffman "both recently voted against their party, with Hortman supporting repeal of free healthcare for illegals and Hoffman joining Republicans in the Senate to pass it."

That post was wrong.

Although Hortman was the only Democrat who voted with Republicans to pass a budget bill that will remove adult immigrants in the U.S. illegally from the state's MinnesotaCare health program, Hoffman voted against the bill that would end such coverage.

After an hour, Right Angle News Network posted a correction.

But X users reposted the claims and Grok, X's artificial intelligence tool, repeated the falsehood about Hoffman. And some, including Collin Rugg, co-owner of conservative news site TrendingPolitics, theorized on X that Hortman's vote was linked to her killing.

www.pbs.org

Fact-checking unsubstantiated claims linking Gov. Walz to Minnesota lawmakers' shootings

In 2019, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz reappointed the suspect wanted in connection with the shooting of Minnesota state legislators to a workforce development board. Conservatives baselessly said that implicated Walz in the killing.
www.pbs.org www.pbs.org
Click to expand...

And there you have it 👍
Since this whole bill business was brought up I hope we get a gander at the actual bill to clear things up.
It is entirely possible that both of them were actually okay with services for illegals but NOT the WAY it was set forth in THAT specific bill.
Maybe one of them believed the bill was poorly written or maybe the bill had a poison dart clause in it or attached to it.

We do not know yet but maybe we will find out.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom