• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W: 585] (CNN) Female passenger killed after being set on fire on an NYC subway train

The guilty one in this case is not the psychotic fire setter. His psychosis has completely eradicated his ability to think or act rationally.
Wrong!
The passers-by were not insane. Their ability to think rationally was not compromised. They simply refused to help. They took videos and walked on by. The guilt is on them.
True.
The nationality and immigration status of the fire starter is irrelevant. Insanity does not recognize borders or citizenship. He should be in a secure jail/hospital for the criminally insane not out in the public.
This has nothing to do with what was said !
This guy would NOT be here to do this to this American, if biden/the DEM's followed US Immigration Laws!
biden and Co. encouraged criminals to cross into America , and they did nothing to vet them or protect Americans from these people !

Stop trying to make BAD Excuses to protect Criminals ! It doesn't work !
 
Would you oppose the death penalty for this murderer? Do you think Biden would commute/pardon him?

As a libertarian, are you perfectly cool with having the death penalty so we can put sick f***s to death despite knowing some innocent people are going to be put to death, also?
 
I think a Jesus freak could create a chart of how bad people are getting and that sin is getting worse and more frequent and "prove" that the reason is because they have turned away from "god" and therefore, "The end is nigh"

What’s your point?

Those charts are wrong too. There have been periods in the last 100,000 years when global temperatures were warmer than they are today. For example, during the Holocene Climatic Optimum, which occurred around 9,000 to 5,000 years ago, temperatures were higher than present-day levels. This period was characterized by warmer temperatures and higher sea levels, which allowed for the expansion of human civilizations.

The chart in the IPCC report is not wrong. It is based on 2020 estimates that the average global temperature during the warmest 200 year period of the HCO, around 6,500 years ago, was around 0.7 °C warmer than the mean for nineteenth century AD, immediately before the Industrial Revolution and 0.3 °C cooler than the average for 2011-2019. Thus the multi century note on the chart.

From your earlier comment it appears that you believe that the more than 1000 contributing scientists to the IPCC report are involved in some giant conspiracy to fool the world for some unknown reason.

Do you realize how silly that sounds! If any one of them were able to provide actual evidence that climate change was a hoax the fossil fuel industry would pay them a reward in the billions of dollars! Of course that does not happen nor do the scientists working for the fossil fuel industry find such evidence. Why? Because your conspiracy theory is just that … a conspiracy theory.


 
It would be like me refuting the Second Coming,
It’s actually quite obvious that if science deniers overwhelm the US that the country will fall behind the rest of the sane world. Unfortunately that seems to be the direction that Trump and many on the right are heading us towards. Hopefully they can be stopped at some point and the country turned around.
 
A report written by Republicans to support a predetermined goal of smearing the prosecution. Not a finding by an appeals court.

In the actual trial the prosecution has the goal of finding the person guilty, the defense attorney has the goal of finding them innocent. The jury decides. If there is any information in the Republican report that would have convinced the jury that Trump was innocent then shame on the defense attorney.
 
Last edited:
I see an angry person that gets triggered by falsehoods and anything the supports your anger. So sad. And facts be damned as long as it supports your beliefs.

You remind me of the gentleman that said his dad was a peaceful loving father until he started watching cable news networks in his older age. Ended up dying angry and bitter at the world. Many of things he picked up from the particular network he watched weren't even true.
Well you need new glasses! And to learn the difference between Facts and Falsehoods.
 
A report written by Republicans to support a predetermined goal of smearing the prosecution. Not a finding by an appeals court.

In the actual trial the prosecution has the goal of finding the person guilty, the defense attorney has the goal of finding them innocent. The jury decides. If there is any information in the Republican report that would have convinced the jury that Trump was innocent then shame on the defense attorney.
So Republican's can not state facts about the Law ?..... That's odd.

Did you not read that part were they mentioned how Braggs was trying to prosecute Federal Law ?
Or how the actions being tried were misdemeanors? Did you not understand that this matter was KNOWN and
was not taken up by previous AG's for YEARS, because it was not a winnable case?

This is Weaponization and Lawfare by the DEM's plain and simple!
 
As a libertarian, are you perfectly cool with having the death penalty so we can put sick f***s to death despite knowing some innocent people are going to be put to death, also?
If I were a juror on a death penalty case, I suspect my bar for "beyond a reasonable doubt" would be pretty damn high. However, before letting the perfect be the enemy of the good, I would consider the odds that the non-executed serial killer might well find a way to increase his string. What is the value you put on the life of the unknown next victim?
 
(CNN) Female passenger killed after being set on fire on an NYC subway train
--

--

Man's inhumanity to man is often astounding. I'm at a loss, with this one. To incinerate a sleeping women, defies all sense of humanity.

To think I used to occasionally nap or doze, when I regularly took public transportation. I suspect many of us have. Imagine dozing one minute, and waking-up ablaze the next. And apparently, the assailant sat on a nearby bench and calmly watched his victim writher and expire. Shocking.
This would be fixed immediately if a bill was passed that required all elected officials to travel by mass transit with the rest of us. The subways and busses would become just as secure as the Capitol became on Jan 7th after the firey but mostly peaceful protest the day before.
 
If I were a juror on a death penalty case, I suspect my bar for "beyond a reasonable doubt" would be pretty damn high.

You seem to be implying that not everyone's bar is high... which just confirms for me that we should do away with capital punishment.

However, before letting the perfect be the enemy of the good, I would consider the odds that the non-executed serial killer might well find a way to increase his string. What is the value you put on the life of the unknown next victim?

About the same as the wrongly convicted man who was executed by the state.
 
What’s your point?



The chart in the IPCC report is not wrong. It is based on 2020 estimates that the average global temperature during the warmest 200 year period of the HCO, around 6,500 years ago, was around 0.7 °C warmer than the mean for nineteenth century AD, immediately before the Industrial Revolution and 0.3 °C cooler than the average for 2011-2019. Thus the multi century note on the chart.

From your earlier comment it appears that you believe that the more than 1000 contributing scientists to the IPCC report are involved in some giant conspiracy to fool the world for some unknown reason.

Do you realize how silly that sounds! If any one of them were able to provide actual evidence that climate change was a hoax the fossil fuel industry would pay them a reward in the billions of dollars! Of course that does not happen nor do the scientists working for the fossil fuel industry find such evidence. Why? Because your conspiracy theory is just that … a conspiracy theory.
I realize how silly scientists who are now the high priests sound.
 
It’s actually quite obvious that if science deniers overwhelm the US that the country will fall behind the rest of the sane world. Unfortunately that seems to be the direction that Trump and many on the right are heading us towards. Hopefully they can be stopped at some point and the country turned around.
Like China and Africa, etc.? Gotcha.
 
No, liberals don’t want that, but thanks for the straw man argument. These dumb arguments are just weak attempts at scoring debating points. Your side wants this or that. All of it is nonsense, no matter from what side. Can we dispense with this and talk about the fact that neither side has done anything substantive about illegal immigration. It is just a political football that keeps being punted back and forth. No one addresses the problem of both sides looking the other way at businesses hiring illegals and our country’s economic dependency on them, just as dependent as our population is on illegal drugs coming in with them. As a nation, we need to heal ourselves before we think we can make real problems disappear by more aggressive police actions or becoming a police state.

IF liberals wanted to stop human trafficking, drug trafficking, sex trafficking, all the child abuse etc that goes on ..... they'd get on board with border control and ending it all

they don't want to - and you'll see it in the coming weeks when Trump gets to work ... liberals/Democrats will fight him every step of the way

you know it, I know it
 
I agree, there is always a responsibility involved and to try and pretend to know this guy's mental state is a wild guess at best

This has nothing to do with what was said !
This guy would NOT be here to do this to this American, if biden/the DEM's followed US Immigration Laws!
biden and Co. encouraged criminals to cross into America , and they did nothing to vet them or protect Americans from these people !

Stop trying to make BAD Excuses to protect Criminals ! It doesn't work !

100% agree

if he wasn't in the USA illegally he'd never have done this
 
What is clear is that by April 2023 he was staying at a Days Inn hotel on 36th Street which had been converted into a migrant shelter — the first of four tax-funded facilities in the city.

When he was issued a transit ticket in 2023, he gave an address of a shelter on Randall’s Island, the sources said.



Rottenberg added that under interrogation Zapeta claimed he didn’t know what happened, noting that he consumes alcohol. A Brooklyn address for Zapeta released by police matches a service center for Samaritan Daytop Village, which provides housing and substance abuse support. The organization did not respond to a request for comment.



I'd ask .... how much was spent housing him in a hotel? Did nobody even know who he was? Alcoholic/Druggie .. where was he getting money for that? What farm did he work on picking veggies in December in NYC ?

I think the truth will be that his hotels were paid for by taxpayers (like the one he murdered) he probably had a cell phone were paid for by taxpayers (like the one he murdered) , debit cards that were paid for by taxpayers (like the one he murdered) , no job, just freeloading off by taxpayers (like the one he murdered)
 
So Republican's can not state facts about the Law ?..... That's odd.

Republicans can do whatever they want, but it is not a judgement by a court. It is akin to a statement by the prosecution with no defense.

Did you not read that part were they mentioned how Braggs was trying to prosecute Federal Law ?
Or how the actions being tried were misdemeanors? Did you not understand that this matter was KNOWN and
was not taken up by previous AG's for YEARS, because it was not a winnable case?

What's you point? This information was all available to the defense to use in court and the jury unanimously found Trump to be guilty.

This is Weaponization and Lawfare by the DEM's plain and simple!

The jury who actually heard the evidence disagrees with you. They say it is a crime that involved 34 felonies.
 
I realize how silly scientists who are now the high priests sound.
In today's world science is what makes one country more competitive than another both economically and militarily. Why are you so hell bent on destroying America's competitiveness?
 
Here, in this situation, they'd have an actual cause to interfere.
Non interference protects you from the government persecuting you.

Note the difference. A cab in NYC accidentally ran over two tourists and six people lifted the van off them.
After Penny is persecuted, crazy sets a homeless woman on fire and another stabs two people and no one interferes. It appears they learned the government wanted to teach them.
 
Back
Top Bottom