• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

(W#4255)The trial of Kyle Rittenhouse for the intentional first degree homicide of 2, injuring of 1

Why because you don’t like his questions? Rittenhouse can’t answer honestly. You only point at something you intend to shoot.
Because he keeps badgering him... Is there anyone that doesn't understand the question and the answer?
 
Had those two people not gone, they would still be alive. Had those two people not attacked Rittenhouse, they would be alive. This is a fact.


Your imagination was the part where you pretend to have any idea whatsoever the reason Rittenhouse chose the gun he did.


What in the actual **** are you ranting about?
LOL - I love it when people with sympathize with racist vigilantes try to bully me :)
 
Because he keeps badgering him... Is there anyone that doesn't understand the question and the answer?
Rittenhouse is trying not to answer anything specific unless he feels it helps him. He is not answering because he knows the answer is not a good one for him.
 
What does this claim have to do with anything I've said, or the propriety of anyone being in the streets that night?
Well, Kyle will profit from being in the streets that night.

How many others folks will?
 
"Bully" you?

What?

Nothing in that sentence is accurate or coherent.
I'm saying it's not hard to guess what people like your and Rittenhouse's motivation is! It's so obvious.
 
Nobody was coming up on him, and not a soul follows him across that lot.
 
Rittenhouse was a police explorer and a jr fireman but he didnt think to call 911 or render first aid. Classy
 
Vigilante justice.
Yeah, it is obvious. If you disagree, feel free to say what that justification is. Don't *****foot around it. Own it.
I just did. Your concept of justice is why we need law enforcement and court systems. We don't need people running around like racist, "Judge Dredds".
 
Rittenhouse was a police explorer and a jr fireman but he didnt think to call 911 or render first aid. Classy

And it even appeared as though he may have tried to downplay his first aid capabilities in front of the jury.

Like why didn't you help the guy you just shot, well um, I.......
 
And it even appeared as though he may have tried to downplay his first aid capabilities in front of the jury.

Like why didn't you help the guy you just shot, well um, I.......
Amazing when asked about after the shooting by his lawyer he said i immediately told them i am turning myself in. Now he doesn’t remember
 
I mean what I said: what the **** does your rambling have to do with what we were talking about? For your recollection, that was that no one "should have been there" that night.
Well, how many people shot people that fateful night?

And on a side note, would you let your 17yo go there?
 
Back
Top Bottom