- Joined
- Feb 25, 2018
- Messages
- 18,027
- Reaction score
- 8,765
- Location
- Silicon Valley, CA
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
That's not the question either. Neely was not deliberately murdered, so the question is whether Neely's actions warranted restraining him which led to his tragic but unintentional death. I think the answer is a clear yes.Yet you don't seem to take issue with using a person's past arrest history as justification for that person's demise. No one is questioning Neely had a lot of issues, but as it relates to the case, his past record isn't the issue, but whether the actions he took on that particular day warranted him dying at the hand of another. Some here seem to have no problem rationalizing someone's death based on past transgressions, but that's not how the law works.
The fact that Neely did have a long and violent criminal history does not justify that conclusion, but it does add tremendous support for it. Neely was in no way a nice person, Michael Jackson impersonations notwithstanding. It is easy to believe the other passengers felt threatened by him and would - and should - have taken actions to stop his rampage in that subway car.