Up to 2000 British girls undergo horror of genital mutilation this summer

[Vader]

I take it you did not read the thread and just came out with what you believed was your superior argument showing yourself as the superior being.

What you did show was that you condemn and want to harshly punish people without having a clue what the situation is.

It is like a mantra certain people on this forum have. Here possible Muslim, interpret barbarity. This thread has shown such people for what they are -

ignorant and hateful.

I have contempt for any barbarian who would mutilate a child in that fashion. You can claim whatever high ground you want but the fact remains ... if you circumsize a female child you are a barbarian and you deserve life in prison without parole.

Frankly, you should be ashamed of yourself.

 

[Gray_Fox_86]

Your calling factual scientific data bull****?
Basic hygiene or not, the penis remains the area with the most bacteria, ESPECIALLY on non-circumcised penises.

Oddly enough all that you stated is incorrect. There was a study where one partner was HIV+ and the other was not. The partner was the female and both partners had sex at least once a day. Every day they would wear a latex condom and after six months of sex with a latex condom on. They tested the negative partner to see if they were infected. The result? Negative. Yet we have many doctors and others who believe latex condoms do not work in protecting people from STIs.

And just so you know factual scientific data bull**** agrees that if you keep it clean the chances of you getting infected with some disorder that would infect you for not keeping it clean. You will not get anything. So really circumcision is bs. So yeah science wins!

 

[MSgt]

I'm sorry but are you equivocating the cutting off of foreskin without anesthesia to damaging the clitoris? Last time I checked both are excruciatingly painful and result in permanent damage to the genitalia.

You are unreal. You are suggesting that as long as male circumcision continues, it is a matter of equality that a girls clitoris be removed? And that in order to stop the butchery, male circumcision must go too? Perhaps if the head of the penis was being removed you'd have a stage. But as it stands you are being rediculous. Male circumcision doesn't effect sexual behavior or psycological status. Removing a clitoris does. Maybe removing her breasts is the same as male circumcision too, huh?

Currently, female genital mutilation occurs across northern Africa and it is tied to tribal tradition, nothing more. It is a barbaric practice and hiding it under another medical procedure just to maintain a sense of cultural political correctness is pathetic. The two greatest obstacle to female emancipation across northern Africa and the Middle East are females who insist on genital mutilation and the wearing of the burqa as a form of cultural prescription and female roles in the society. For males, this kind of genital mutilation equates to neutering.