• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

UN votes for new sanctions on Iran over nuclear issue


DP Veteran
May 14, 2009
Reaction score
Political Leaning
UN votes for new sanctions on Iran over nuclear issue

The UN Security Council has voted in favour of fresh sanctions against Iran over its nuclear programme.

The council voted 12 to two, with one abstention, in favour of a fourth round of sanctions, including tighter finance curbs and an expanded arms embargo.

US President Barack Obama said the sanctions were the toughest ever on Iran sending an "unmistakable message" on stopping the spread of nuclear arms.

Iran quickly vowed to continue its uranium enrichment activities.

Its envoy to the UN's nuclear watchdog Ali Asghar Soltanieh said: "Nothing will change."

The US and its allies fear Iran is secretly trying to build a nuclear bomb, but Tehran insists its programme is aimed solely at peaceful energy use.
Heavy weapons

The Security Council resolution was opposed by Turkey and Brazil. They had earlier brokered a deal with Iran on uranium enrichment. Lebanon abstained.

The new sanctions were passed after being watered down during negotiations with Russia and China on Tuesday.

There are no crippling economic sanctions and there is no oil embargo.
Continue reading the main story

[Sanctions] will most probably lead to the suffering of the people of Iran

Maria Luiza Ribeiro Viotti, Brazilian envoy to UN New sanctions 'not the last' New Iran bodies under sanction Last resort or lost opportunity?

Those passed include prohibiting Iran from buying heavy weapons such as attack helicopters and missiles.

They also toughen rules on financial transactions with Iranian banks and increase the number of Iranian individuals and companies that are targeted with asset freezes and travel bans.

There is also a new framework of cargo inspections to detect and stop Iran's acquisition of illicit materials.

Mr Obama accused Iran's leaders of "hiding behind outlandish rhetoric".

But he said the sanctions did "not close the door on diplomacy" and he urged Iran to "choose a different and better path".

Continue reading the main story


* Permanent (with power of veto): China; France; Russia; UK; US

* Non-permanent (term ends 2010): Austria; Bosnia-Herzegovina; Gabon; Japan; Mexico; Nigeria; Uganda


* Non-permanent: Brazil and Turkey. Had both brokered a deal with Iran in which Tehran would send low-enriched uranium to Turkey in return for reactor fuel


* Non permanent: Lebanon. Had voiced opposition to the sanctions. Iran-backed Hezbollah is part of the government

However, both Turkey and Brazil spoke out in opposition, saying the deal they had brokered with Iran had not been given time.

Brazilian ambassador to the UN Maria Luiza Ribeiro Viotti said: "We do not see sanctions as an effective instrument in this case. They will most probably lead to the suffering of the people of Iran and will play into the hands of people on all sides who do not want dialogue to prevail."

Turkey's envoy Ertugrul Apakan said the Turkey-Brazil deal had created "a new reality" on Iran's nuclear programme and Turkey was "deeply concerned" that sanctions would have a negative impact.

Prof Abbas Edalat, the founder of the Campaign against Sanctions and Military Intervention in Iran, told BBC Radio 4's PM programme that the sanctions would make "everything worse".

He said: "What the US has done has proved conclusively beyond any doubt that it is not interested in negotiations with Iran... There has been massive hypocrisy here."

The BBC News website's world affairs correspondent, Paul Reynolds, says this new round of sanctions is unlikely to have any more effect on Iranian policy than the first three.

Iran's vital economic interests have not been targeted, he says, and Tehran has in any case developed systems of evasion.

Iran had tried to ease international concerns by agreeing the deal with Turkey and Brazil. It would see Tehran deposit 1,200kg of low-enriched uranium with Turkey, in return for reactor fuel.

But the deal has not been accepted by world powers and on Wednesday, the US, Russia and France outlined their concerns in letters to the IAEA.

Hopefully it wouldn't end there.
Those sanctions are very weak, but they're a step forward in the diplomatic battle against the Iranian government.
Last edited:
Meanwhile back at the ranch.....

President Barack Obama said Wednesday the United States was to unveil a 400-million-dollar civilian aid package for the Palestinians, as he called the situation in the Gaza Strip "unsustainable."

US to unveil Palestinian aid package: Obama

that's yours and mine tax dollars going to terrorists in Gaza.

Sanctions will do little to curb Iran, just as they did nothing to curb NK.

Apocalypse posted (Hopefully it wouldn't end there.
Those sanctions are very weak, but they're a step forward in the diplomatic battle against the Iranian government.)
The Sanctions as originally proposed were considerably stronger and may (had they been passed) have caused considerable inconvenience to certain members of the Iranian ruling and or Military Establishment.
However, in order to have further Sanctions passed by the UN it was necessary to have agreement by those members of the UN without which no Sanctions could be passed.
Russia and China have each of them important trade links with Iran, neither of these Nations wished to see these trade links damaged, hence what was passed as addition to the Sanctions already in place was weakened.
Probably to the extent that Hilary and the US have wasted time, money in putting what amounts to nothing much in place.
Top Bottom