Laughably daft. You seem to think criticism of the handling of this conflict is being against peace, but prior to this we did not have Israel and Iran lobbing missiles at each other. The US chose to not curtail Israel's attack and then joined in, so celebrating a ceasefire to a fight they started is an odd self congratulatory moment, especially when knowing this president was the one who created the conditions for Iran to expand their nuclear program. Cleaning up your own mess isn't really something to celebrate, it's the low bar expectation of what someone should do.
El I think appeasing Iran in any way aids and abetts not just all conflicts in the Middle East but around the world.
The reason I would argue that is because of their track record on financing terrorist attacks and organizations, providing Putin missiles and drones to attack Ukraine, Iran's direct military actions in Lebanon, Syria, Iraq.
I don't think Iran with its current regime can be expected to use nuclear energy only for domestic energy.I think that makes zero sense. The level of urnaium enrichment it had and was increasing long since surpassed the levels needed for domestic use. The constant lying to the IAEA and hiding what it was doing spoke to its dishonesty.
Is it a double standard Israel has the nuke weapons Iran wants? Yes. However by Israel being the only one in the ME with that capacity, it has prevented Saudi Arabia, Egypt, UAE, aquiring nuke weapons from Pakistan.
The practical reality is China, Pakistan, Russia, organized crime syndicates could smuggle in nuclear weapons to Iran. For all we know they did and all these attacks are a cover to distract from taking some out.
Next. Let's think about it. We all have our attention directed at nuke sites. All the media stories have done that. To me when I read such things and I see everyone on both sides of the debate focused on nuke sites, my initial reaction is that is a deliberate direction manipulation of attention or misdirection from something else.
Come on. Right now, any country could make a dirty bomb (a bomb with enough radiation to do as much damageto human as a traditional nuke weapon without the property destruction and if Iran wanted to wipe out Israel's population all it would take is one or two dirty missile heads. It could also send in missile heads with deadly viruses it has.
This notion only a nuke missile will be used by Iran is silly. No one knows what weapons Iran has or had and what the IDF knows about them. We all base our info on what we read.
Having lived there and knowing people in the military there what I know is simply this-Israel can not and will never tell you or the world the true extent and nature against it. If it did it would trigger unintended consequences. What Israel sends out as news or what the US or Iran does is for sure in some way edited and manufactured to suit security concerns that can not be compromised.
This situation is far from over. Trump was desperate for a result timing it to have kim go to the NATO meetings and push for a Nobel Peace prize. Its pretty transparent. That aint happening.
I can tell you no Israeli believes they are not still in danger. As for Iranians internally-whether this spurs an internal revolution (which it might have been partially intended to do) I would not guess on.
I know you approach this issue as if Iran has rational spokespeople to negotiate with. Sorry I do not. I think the rational players needed to enable that were killed or thrown out of Iran and we do those people killed or thrown out of Iran a great dis-service playing up their government as reasonable and rational.
I again disclose my bias as being in strong support of the Iranian progressive movement outside Iran seeking regime change. Such people if they could take back their government not ony would end this conflict but they could repair relations with Israel and then go on to work with Israel and other ME countries to find peace in Lebanon, Syria and Gaza.
Wishful thinking but you should know many progressive Israel supporters are deeply allied with the Iranian progressive movements for peace and their refugees outside Iran.
That all said I get your points and respect them otherwise I woud not reply. Part of the argument you make is that if Trump had not ripped up the agreement Obama made with Iran this current mess may not have developed. I know that argument. I think that agreement was not working as Iran had repeatedly violated it.