- Joined
- Sep 29, 2007
- Messages
- 29,262
- Reaction score
- 10,126
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
I just gave you a specific example just as you asked, winnie. You remind me of my ex girlfriend, and thats not a compliment.
go for it
News flash. Liberals are not tolerant like they PRETEND to be.
You don't have access to Google?Great you got some names good for you. Now pick one and demonstrate how liberals treat her.
It's not like he has to go any farther than this thread where he can simply read what his liberal cohorts are saying about Pamela GellerYou don't have access to Google?
It seems the only way anyone can be a 'liberal' is to ignore their record.
Sorry, but Mohamed is every Muslims prophet. You should have known that.
Not every Muslims is a terrorist.You and those in the liberal media could care less about offending the 99.999% of muslims who are not terrorists. You and the liberal media are only worried about pissing of the tiny percentage who are terrorists. Terrorism is the unlaw use of or the threat of violence in order to coerce and or intimidate a group of people into doing what you want.By trying to not offend terrorists you are basically giving terrorists what they want.
Wrong. I can see absolutely no value in gratuitously offending the entire faith. But even worse, drawing out the extremists that wish to kill you for it. Can you please explain to me what makes Geller's hateful, bigoted and provocative actions worth the consequences. Again, if Geller just has to draw her cartoons that ridicule Mohamed, then she's going to have to face the consequences.
Then don't offend them. It's one thing to hold the opinion that mocking a specific religion is a bad move and a whole other thing to argue for making free speech illegal.
wtf, who's arguing that free speech should be made illegal. I'll talk to you after you go back and get up to speed on my position in this thread.
Eh, wtf right back at you mate, I haven't said that's your position I simply pointed out that unless you're arguing it should be illegal then your words carry no relevancy at all. Too complicated?
Also, you must be thinking highly of yourself if you believe that I care whether or not you'll be talking to me. Please don't.
Oh, you just wanted to make a false observation and thought I'd stand quiet. Which is it, you want to quote me and have me respond to you, or do you want to just not debate at all?
Wrong. I can see absolutely no value in gratuitously offending the entire faith.
But even worse, drawing out the extremists that wish to kill you for it. Can you please explain to me what makes Geller's hateful, bigoted and provocative actions worth the consequences. Again, if Geller just has to draw her cartoons that ridicule Mohamed, then she's going to have to face the consequences.
Not every Muslims is a terrorist.You and those in the liberal media could care less about offending the 99.999% of muslims who are not terrorists. You and the liberal media are only worried about pissing of the tiny percentage who are terrorists. Terrorism is the unlaw use of or the threat of violence in order to coerce and or intimidate a group of people into doing what you want.By trying to not offend terrorists you are basically giving terrorists what they want.
Please stop trying to tell liberals what they think. You suck at it.
Liberals aren't near as complicated as they believe themselves to be. In fact 'simple' would describe them well.Please stop trying to tell liberals what they think. You suck at it.
Stand quiet to what? My 'observation' as you put it is that unless you're trying to make a political argument here - you know, something along the lines of "let's make it illegal to mock religion" - your words carry no relevancy to the thread. If it's merely your opinion that it's a "wrong move" to mock Islam then don't do it, asking others not to do it when it's their right to do so is a whole other thing.
I don't know what could possibly make you fail to understand such a simple concept, would it help if I typed slower?
What a load of crap.Most people complaining about Gellar have no problem with the Piss Christ, The book of Mormon play and many other things that offend christians and other religious people.The only reason they say anything about offending Islam is because of the terrorists in that religion.
Terrorism is the unlaw use of or the threat of violence in order to coerce and or intimidate a group of people into doing what you want.So you want to give into terrorists demands.
I have a huge problem with the "piss Christ" and any other gratuitous mocking of any faiths icons. Including Gellars irresponsible behaviour we've been discussing here.
Speech has restrictions in America. I wouldn't expect you to understand that.
Serrano needs a history lesson if he believes Christ hung on the cross for three days, but then what would he know about it anyway?This is what the artist says about Piss Christ:
"The thing about the crucifix itself is that we treat it almost like a fashion accessory. When you see it, you're not horrified by it at all, but what it represents is the crucifixion of a man," Serrano told The Guardian in 2012. "And for Christ to have been crucified and laid on the cross for three days where he not only bled to death, he shat himself and he peed himself to death. So if 'Piss Christ' upsets you, maybe it's a good thing to think about what happened on the cross."
You gave your opinion of Palin and that is all.
Speech has restrictions in America. I wouldn't expect you to understand that.
You got schooled. Sorry about your luck.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?