That's a ridiculous whine without any foundation in reality. Ask the Dixie Chicks about "cancel culture." And, look back at the 2016 election to see who cried the loudest about "elites."Yes, I realize the definition was too narrow but it made the quick point that today's liberals are, indeed, not all that liberal. In fact they're the mother of 'cancel culture', censorship, and 'eat the rich'.
...
There wasn’t even a basement...That's a ridiculous whine without any foundation in reality. Ask the Dixie Chicks about "cancel culture." And, look back at the 2016 election to see who cried the loudest about "elites."
Oh, and did anyone ever locate that pedophile ring in basement of that pizza shop yet?
What an odd demand.If you're not going to post something intelligent, or even marginally worthwhile, please just put me on ignore.
The European Whites have done quite well as a group, and of course much or all of that is related to culture and religion. Other cultures have done less well and you can see that immediately as you cross the border from Texas into Mexico, for example. There's really not much room for debate.
I will not say that Tucker’s brand of demagoguery is not dangerous and I will consider that it is. That is, I must at least be open to considering the possibility that a trend, in this case a trend distributed by a major media company, is dangerous.Why is Tucker's brand of racist demagoguery is dangerous? It paints a false reality for those easily led into believing it.
Mexico is also 90% Christian and well over 50% European. I guess Young doesn’t consider Spain as European in his calculations of who qualifies as “European Whites.”Mexico is 80% Catholic. What is the difference in how they worship ve European Catholics?
Also: when you say cultural differences, what would those be?
The only Radicals are the Right Wingers who tried to overturn an election and purged the GOP of anyone not loyal to their cult leader.I will not say that Tucker’s brand of demagoguery is not dangerous and I will consider that it is. That is, I must at least be open to considering the possibility that a trend, in this case a trend distributed by a major media company, is dangerous.
But what I want to suggest is that we need to take our eyes off Carlson — just for a minute — and focus our attention on a huge and visible social phenomenon now sweeping through the nation: Woke Social Justicism. Activist postmodernism. Activist critical theory. Postcolonial theory. And of course the various gender-based derivatives of ‘social justice activism’.
All these, acccording to my researches, are branches of Postmodern theory when postmodernism melded with a social justice activism; was reduced to a cluster of *actionable concerns* and spread through social media channels as a sort of ‘hysterical infection’.
Now let me use a phrase that Calamity has used and see how it functions with a different juxtaposition: “These paint a false reality for those easily led into believing them”.
Someone on this thread brought up ‘Classical Liberalism’. The most wonderful teacher on this topic is Isaiah Berlin and a search on YouTube will bring up his wonderful presentations. But with that said allow me to suggest, just to open the conversation to the possibility, that radical and activist postmodern critical theory is by its very nature, and according to its own declarations, extremely anti-liberal! (in this classic sense). It is radicalism and it openly declares that it must undermine and topple *oppressive structures* and *oppressive relationships*. It leads people to take vigilante actions such as rioting, pulling down monuments, attacking those it identifies as *enemies*, protesting at talks on universities and disrupting them.
Anyone can easily see the point I make! This is radical anti-liberalism plain and simple. Though those who engage this way say they are doing it *for a higher purpose*.
There is something really quite wrong, quite ethically wrong, and questionable about these radical forms of activism. They seek out problems, they exacerbate existing problems that should be dealt with through ‘liberal toleration’. They build on differences. They accentuate differences. They are very very hard-headed in their approach. They show tyrannical, dominating characteristics. I think I could go on here and I would not be engaging in unfair rhetoric.
If what I suggest here is true — and to understand my position you’d have to read some of what I have been reading lately: deep criticisms of postmodern/critical theory-based activism — then Tucker Carlson is acting as a classical reactionary: reacting to (if you will allow this turn of phrase) the insanity and also the undermining destructiveness of activist Critical Theory.
And again if this is true when the Fringe Left — a radically-inclined and activist Left — begins marching through culture, as indeed it has and is, it naturally provokes reaction, and that reaction, naturally, will not be ‘liberal’ as classically defined,
The European Whites have done quite well as a group, and of course much or all of that is related to culture and religion. Other cultures have done less well and you can see that immediately as you cross the border from Texas into Mexico, for example. There's really not much room for debate.
This is an example of ‘reduced discourse’. I would also suggest that you work with reduced concepts and with the cluster of reductions I referred to previously.The only Radicals are the Right Wingers who tried to overturn an election and purged the GOP of anyone not loyal to their cult leader.
I would appear not. But when one examines those strange communications (the emails) they tend to produce suspicion and those *code words* also aroused suspicion.Oh, and did anyone ever locate that pedophile ring in basement of that pizza shop yet?
your concept of quite well is ... what? Monetary and Material things? Because white people have for centuries committed some of the greatest atrocities in this nation for centuries... for Monetary and Material things and abusively using others to create and build, what they deny and put up oppositional against the usage and participation of the people whose labor and tax resources, ideas and contribution of all types and sorts when into building and creating, always with a delusion that such stuff makes them superior.The European Whites have done quite well as a group, and of course much or all of that is related to culture and religion. Other cultures have done less well and you can see that immediately as you cross the border from Texas into Mexico, for example. There's really not much room for debate.
It appears that Republican Matthew Louis Gaetz II and his counterparts are members of the real pedophile ring. The pizza show spin was nothing more than another Republican led projection to deflect what is within their own ranks, they always use that tactic "as usual" to cover what is within their own ranks.That's a ridiculous whine without any foundation in reality. Ask the Dixie Chicks about "cancel culture." And, look back at the 2016 election to see who cried the loudest about "elites."
Oh, and did anyone ever locate that pedophile ring in basement of that pizza shop yet?
This is the ‘insinuation of unutterable evil!’ brought out against white people and ‘whiteness’. What possible defense would it or could it allow? No defense.Because white people have for centuries committed some of the greatest atrocities in this nation for centuries...
Well, who shipped in the slaves and killed off the Indians? White People.This is the ‘insinuation of unutterable evil!’ brought out against white people and ‘whiteness’. What possible defense would it or could it allow? No defense.
When these sorts of accusations are employed it is inherent in them that no defense against them is possible!
Tricky, very tricky!
There is no defense against "historical facts" that are well documented. It's up to "people, as individuals, to invest themselves not to repeat the past of such atrocious conduct, support of such conduct and not to participate in such conduct.This is the ‘insinuation of unutterable evil!’ brought out against white people and ‘whiteness’. What possible defense would it or could it allow? No defense.
When these sorts of accusations are employed it is inherent in them that no defense against them is possible!
Tricky, very tricky!
I like chord in place of cord!IMO, the only solution to end an asshole's show like Tucker Carlson's is to cut the chord
Overtly racist or just another thinly veiled dog whistle, you decide.
I say it was pretty overt.
Illegals don't vote. And, they certainly do not get "free stuff."
Loop hole
Their anchor baby kids get it, so the illegal parents gets it
Sigh
Illegal alien kids do get Free healthcare in our largest state, the shithole of Calif
But if their parents are working and paying taxes, or working illegally and being woefully underpaid, is it really "free?"
But if their parents are working and paying taxes,
or working illegally and being woefully underpaid,
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?