• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

TSA ejects Oceanside man from airport for refusing security check

The Prof said:
mere mindless argumentation: sure, he was humiliated, sure, she's pissed, sure, the ny city council will nix the intrusions---but no one was FONDLED

LOL!

why, look it up in your funk and wagnall's
Click to expand...

I can't take Boo Dudley seriously any more. Can't. Won't.

People are pissed at being felt up and this idiot thinks: "Oh no, even though they feel violated I know better. You weren't fondled even though you feel like it. You know, you 100+ people who feel this way: you're all stupid. You couldn't have been fondled even though they put their hands everywhere whilst trying to find things in folds and crevices, ie; "junk.""

Yep, I sympathize with you, Boo.
 
Last edited:
RealClearPolitics - Video - Hillary Clinton "Would Avoid" TSA Pat Downs

schieffer (he's the host of face the nation which is a tv show on cbs on sunday mornings): "would you submit to one of these pat downs?"

hillary: "not if i could avoid it, i mean, who would?"

bennie thompson (chair of house homeland security, which is a committee) and sheila jackson lee (everyone knows her---LOL!): "runs afoul of privacy and civil liberties"

no FONDLE

just a PROBLEM

i mean, who would?

LOL!
 
Last edited:




All of em eh? I pity you. :roll:
 




Pathetic. Utterly pathetic.
 
Wake said:
I can't take Boo Dudley seriously any more. Can't. Won't.
Click to expand...

who could take seriously someone who doesn't have enough self respect to take responsibility for the things he or she says?

all that's left is in your face
 

they must have lost their dictionaries

LOL!

meanwhile:


TSA Responds to Passenger Outrages: Underwear Search Should 'Never' Happen - ABC News
 

I'll let you scroll back to see where I do. Not my job to repeat things for you.
 
American said:
I'll let you scroll back to see where I do. Not my job to repeat things for you.
Click to expand...

The article you listed with your comment didn't. It's not my job to read yuour mind as to what you're talking about either.

BTW, the fellow with the urostomy bag was on CNN today and he was quite reasonable. He also made the statement that many were reporting his feeling and the story inaccurately. Go figure. :coffeepap
 

No one has been fondled, felt up or gropped. It is hyperbolic exaggeration to say they have.
 
Quite reasonable, and of course the TSA did a superb job, right? No doubt he'd do it all over again.
 

You would be wrong. Not the first time mind mind you, and it is no surprise that you would be hyperboilic and exaggerate the content of my response. Seems to be a habit on this thread, which might explian how a pat down becomes feeling up and fondling. Not that a pat down is actually feeling up or fondling. But, the exaggerations are consistent at any rate.
 

You're right, Sawyer is a very reasonable man... too bad his TSA "fondler" wasn't. Sawyer described the event as a horrible nightmare in the interview and that TSA needs to train its employees better or stop the pat downs.

I did not hear him claim anyone was reporting his feelings or story inaccurately? Did you simply make that up ??

If Sawyer wasn't treated unfairly, why did TSA call him to apologize ???
 
Last edited:

We're all adults, including the little boy who had to remove his shirt? You have some issues buddy.
 

Here's an AP video interview...

CNN interview...
http://amfix.blogs.cnn.com/2010/11/22/cancer-survivor-humiliated-from-tsa-pat-down/
Not once does he make the claim you did in bold.

Response?
 
Last edited:
Whovian said:
Here's an AP video interview...
Not once does he make the claim you did in bold.

Response?
Click to expand...
Boo would say, "What's the big deal?"
 
American said:
Boo would say, "What's the big deal?"
Click to expand...

It was a problem, but not fondling or feeling up. As this person noted, it was merely inexperience in dealing with people with a medical condition. He was not hateful or hyperbolic, but someone making a reasonable argument. And has even been asked to help train, and he is considering it.

Do you see the difference yet?
 

Actually, we were referring to this comment you made...

He also made the statement that many were reporting his feeling and the story inaccurately
Click to expand...

...which is not supported by the actual video of the interview you said you saw. That was what I was looking for a response on... the fact that you attributed a statement to the guy that he did not actually make.
 

And I respond to you above. Get me a second to listen to it again.
 
Whovian said:
lol.. post-cross syndrome.
Click to expand...

No problem.

Listen to this. "he had some of the story mixed up, and I said no problem, a lot of people do at this point."

This was what I heard, admittedly in passing.
 
Boo Radley said:
No problem.

Listen to this. "he had some of the story mixed up, and I said no problem, a lot of people do at this point."

This was what I heard, admittedly in passing.
Click to expand...

just a wee bit different than 'He also made the statement that many were reporting his feeling and the story inaccurately'... lol
 
Whovian said:
just a wee bit different than 'He also made the statement that many were reporting his feeling and the story inaccurately'... lol
Click to expand...

There is. I accept that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…