- Joined
- Dec 5, 2015
- Messages
- 28,609
- Reaction score
- 6,367
- Location
- Washington
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
So you admit that this study would be used to push for bans on semi-automatic firearms under the guise of an assault weapons ban and or a ban on 11 to 30 round standard capacity magazines under the guise of a high capacity magazine ban? I am surprised that are upfront about that.
So you admit that this study would be to push for anti-gun laws?
Yet you have the magic pill for "gun violence". And yes I quoted "gun violence" I've never seen or heard of a gun get violent. And that pill is ban them all right?
Yes, probably.
If marijuana studies show it can help treat depression and suicidal thoughts, shouldn't it be legal then?
Why are you anti-knowledge???
If the results of the study are predetermined, thevstudy isn't scientific. It's political.
The Republicans are clearly politically motivated. No amount of reason, facts, or science will cause you to support common-sense gun laws.
Can you refer us to the science that proves a pistol grip, an adjustable shoulder stock, a flash suppressor, or a bayonet lug on a rifle is a significant threat to public safety?
These have been bogeymen for gun control zealots for decades, so there must be something.
we're a gun culture. We shoot each other.
Never gonna change (there will be some minor fluctuations).
So we shouldn't save leaves because you selfishly want to buy guns? Shameful.
I don't think some of you people don't understand basic human nature. The majority of humans are not cold-blooded killers you know?
Nonsense. If 2nd amendment opponents didn't think the study couldn't be used to push for more anti-2nd amendment laws then they wouldn't be pushing for the study. There are people on your side with enough money to fund such a study. The reason Michael Bloomberg, Violence Policy Center and the Brady Campaign aren't funding a study with thier own money is because they knows the results will never be seen as credible by anyone except by other anti-2nd amendment trash. Anti-2nd amendment trash want a study is funded with tax payer money because it gives more credence to a anti-2nd amendment study under the guise of being unbiased.Who cares?
It seems you are anti-knowledge. Let's just report the facts. A study consists of graphs, numbers, statistics, comparisons. Are you afraid of the truth?
Just because you don't believe in global warming, should that mean we shouldn't study climate?
A study itself is not political. How it is interpreted can be but I support putting it all out there. I
It sounds like you know any study will be bad showing guns need to be restricted more.
Who cares?
It seems you are anti-knowledge. Let's just report the facts. A study consists of graphs, numbers, statistics, comparisons. Are you afraid of the truth?
Just because you don't believe in global warming, should that mean we shouldn't study climate?
A study itself is not political. How it is interpreted can be but I support putting it all out there. It sounds like you know any study will be bad showing guns need to be restricted more. Are you afraid of the truth?
I don't think some of you people don't understand basic human nature. The majority of humans are not cold-blooded killers you know?
we?..........
Why did you quote my comment if you weren't going to respond to it.
The United States of America
Guns by Science Vs | Free Listening on SoundCloud
The presence of a gun increases the likelihood of violence.
IF you could guarantee me that all criminals would turn in their guns, the only reason "we" would need them would be against the "peaceful" Democrat rioters.
The problem with the laws today is that criminals can easily obtain guns legally.
Your plan to make criminals turn their stolen guns in?
The criminals are the one providing the guns to the criminals.
Guns by Science Vs | Free Listening on SoundCloud
The presence of a gun increases the likelihood of violence.
The criminals are the one providing the guns to the criminals.
Then why place more restrictions on legal gun owners?
Uh huh. What is your plan for dealing with criminals?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?