• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump's phone call with the GA SOS about finding votes to overturn the election

What do you think of Trump's phone call to the GA SOS?

  • Trump was just kidding

    Votes: 1 1.0%

  • Trump wasn't kidding but it's no big deal

    Votes: 3 3.1%

  • Who cares about Trump, who recorded the phone call?

    Votes: 2 2.1%

  • He's out of control, 25 for 45

    Votes: 9 9.3%

  • Last straw, I'm changing my support from Trump to Biden

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Criminal investigation should begin immediately

    Votes: 82 84.5%
  • Total voters
    97
  • Poll closed .
Paradoxical said:
I don't care if you re-listened to it a million times. The point is that Trump reamed o=him out and gave him the facts and he didn't want to listen. He is a RINO being controlled by Stacey Abrams because she's an obese bully. The actual transcript of the call is all the proof anyone needs that Trump was in the right.
Click to expand...
The actual transcript is what shows Trump is completely wrong, lying, and/or misinformed by a lot of things regarding this election and his own case. It also shows why two lawyers for Trump may be in danger of losing their job and/or law licenses.
 
roguenuke said:
The actual transcript is what shows Trump is completely wrong, lying, and/or misinformed by a lot of things regarding this election and his own case. It also shows why two lawyers for Trump may be in danger of losing their job and/or law licenses.
Click to expand...
All you are saying is that you disagree with Trump. And................??
 
Paradoxical said:
All you are saying is that you disagree with Trump. And................??
Click to expand...
Everyone should disagree with Trump since he has no evidence of his claims, only "they said" and internet rumors/conspiracy theories. You can't even produce real evidence for his claims. Hell, even Lou Dobbs admits there is no evidence of voter fraud. Simply believing it happened doesn't mean you have evidence or that it did.
 
CaughtInThe said:
in other words the partners are sitting around and yelling "how the hell are we gonna fire her??" and "how much did she bill last year??"
Click to expand...
I'm hoping they file a complaint with the bar association on ethics violation. Someone definitely needs to do that with the other guy, Kurt Hilbert, since he suggested something that I'm not sure is even legal, let alone ethical when it comes to saying the SoSGa could simply "deputize" some of Trump's lawyers to gain access to privacy information.
 
roguenuke said:
I'm hoping they file a complaint with the bar association on ethics violation. Someone definitely needs to do that with the other guy, Kurt Hilbert, since he suggested something that I'm not sure is even legal, let alone ethical when it comes to saying the SoSGa could simply "deputize" some of Trump's lawyers to gain access to privacy information.
Click to expand...
you know what's really sad? that female lawyer (along with millions of Americans) were simply born an innocent baby years ago. they had to be taught or learned (in almost all cases) to hate this much and be this corrupt and try to overthrow our government.

innocent newborns turn into these people.
 
CaughtInThe said:
you know what's really sad? that female lawyer (along with millions of Americans) were simply born an innocent baby years ago. they had to be taught or learned (in almost all cases) to hate this much and be this corrupt and try to overthrow our government.

innocent newborns turn into these people.
Click to expand...
While I don't agree with her helping Trump here at all, I actually have a much bigger issue with things Trump himself said (granted, she should have stopped him or realized from before the call it was a very bad idea to even have him on it) and what that other guy, Hilter, said. She was being a lawyer. Not exactly being ethical, but she did seem to at least try a few times on that call to clarify or be semi-reasonable (she corrects Trump at least twice, once in regards to how many times ballots were run and then again when it comes to what they had asked the SoSGa for in regards to signature audits). The other guy and Meadows though were just being completely stupid when they did talk. And we all know Trump.

Trump: It was 18,000 ballots but they used each one three times.

Mitchell: Well, I don't know about that.
Click to expand...

Germany: We chose Cobb County because that was the only county where there's been any evidence submitted that the signature verification was not properly done.

Trump: No, but I told you. We're not, we're not saying that.

Mitchell: We did say that.
Click to expand...

She is much more careful about how she phrases things (with the exception being how she seems to not understand that they cannot simply give them access to voter records). She feigns ignorance often here.
 
roguenuke said:
While I don't agree with her helping Trump here at all, I actually have a much bigger issue with things Trump himself said (granted, she should have stopped him or realized from before the call it was a very bad idea to even have him on it) and what that other guy, Hilter, said. She was being a lawyer. Not exactly being ethical, but she did seem to at least try a few times on that call to clarify or be semi-reasonable (she corrects Trump at least twice, once in regards to how many times ballots were run and then again when it comes to what they were asking the SoSGa for). The other guy and Meadows though were just being completely stupid when they did talk. And we all know Trump.

She is much more careful about how she phrases things (with the exception being how she seems to not understand that they cannot simply give them access to voter records). She feigns ignorance often here.
Click to expand...


I have a HUGE problem with EVERY lawyer on this call on the Trump team if they knew they had filed a case in federal court but that the person they were having a discussion with, as a state official, had not been served and that the STATE did not have legal representation on the call. Three attorneys from the State AG's office joined the case yesterday after the state was served.

Screen Shot 2021-01-05 at 5.13.40 AM.webp
 
roguenuke said:
Everyone should disagree with Trump since he has no evidence of his claims, only "they said" and internet rumors/conspiracy theories. You can't even produce real evidence for his claims. Hell, even Lou Dobbs admits there is no evidence of voter fraud. Simply believing it happened doesn't mean you have evidence or that it did.
Click to expand...
Proof1.webp
 
Holy smokes... No wonder the Trump legal team didn't want the hearing this morning available by phone or video... Judge Cohen doesn't seem impressed...

 
CaughtInThe said:
i'm shocked that Paradoxical, in a thread about Trump's phone call, would post a picture of blacks and whites. it's so out of character.

all that's missing is the word "thug".
Click to expand...
That was what Biden called them, isn't it? Or was it criminals? I forget. Could you Google that for me? Thanks in advance.
 
Paradoxical said:
Illegal taping and revealing of a private conversation borders on treason.
Click to expand...

there was no illegal taping and Trump is the one that talked about the private conversation first...thus opening the door for others to do so
 
GolfingChef said:
there was no illegal taping and Trump is the one that talked about the private conversation first...thus opening the door for others to do so
Click to expand...
Johnny Cochran?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom