That's about as brainless as saying that the worst pandemic in a century happened under Trump, not Biden.
www.politico.eu
Fortunately for Ukraine, Biden was in the WH, not Trump. Biden's administration worked hard to convince Ukraine the threat was real. They released intel showing the world what Russia was up to. Their leadership resulted in a united NATO response.
No it wasn't.
Biden has made it where Ukraine can defend itself..there was literally nothing a US president can do in order to stop Putin from invading any country he chooses to invade...what he did, was the only option he had available short of dedicating troops...is that what you want? Not me...I am not for us putting troops in another war. We gave them supplies and let them defend themselves...which is a core, inherent right...the right to self defense.so?
Biden/Kamala .. what did they promise and stand for in 2020? the liberal media spread fears, Biden/Democrats promised to put Putin in his place ..... they lied and failed
Besides extending the frontline of the U.S.-Russian confrontation to include democracy and human rights, Biden can also be counted on to take on Russia more boldly in the former Soviet Union, from Ukraine, Belarus, and Moldova to the South Caucasus and Central https://carnegieendowment.org/posts...licy-and-russia?lang=en¢er=russia-eurasia
“Unlike Trump, I’ll defend our democratic values and stand up to autocrats like Putin,” Biden tweeted in August.
How will Biden, who called Putin ‘soulless’, stand up to Russia?
President-elect Joe Biden has promised to confront the Russian leader, who enjoyed somewhat warmer relations with Trump.www.aljazeera.com
Ukrainians are now eyeing Washington with dread and worry that a victory for Donald Trump in November’s presidential election could send a signal to Russia — which, according to U.S. National Intelligence reports, is actively trying to get Trump reelected — that it can increase its aggression against Ukraine.
Why Ukraine loves Joe Biden
Another 4 years of Trump would be a boon to Russia, Ukrainians fear.
You have this backwards. The 3/5th's compromise actually reduced the population of slave states and the impact on population for taxation and apportionment. Had slaves been counted as the people they were, the 1790 population of Virginia (for example) would have rightfully been 747,550 instead of the official count of 630,500.
So, you don't know that Trump was fined $2 million in a court of law for stealing from his own charity?
FACT is Trump was President when Iran hit a military base in Iraq and downplayed the injuries.
The representation in Senate was made the same regardless...it gave the states with slaves and a lower population count equal power. It didn't reduce the population..the 3/5 actually counted the slave...where they were not counted before. They weren't counted as a whole, but they were counted by three-fifths....before that count was ZERO..so, how did it reduce their population again?
I mean, people keep supporting Trump even though he inspired a sedition and worked to overturn an election, so I suppose voters can be that shallow.
Yes, more people voted for Biden.
It's not a very small percentage of the country. You already admitted that these areas contain more people. They're the majority.
"My party insists on only catering to the goals of a minority of people" yeah man that is true and it sounds like a you problem. Maybe the GOP should consider that all Americans matter.
A voter in Montana has their vote weighted four times as heavily as a voter in California.
If MAGA were even in the same ball park as reality, they wouldn't support a moronic gameshow host that steals from charity.
Yes, the number of people is non-zero. So what?
Iran is also apparently "anyone but Trump".
www.cbsnews.com
lol
