that's not true (since you couldn't quite seem to grasp that the example wasn't literal).
here, i'll give it to you straight from Psychology 101. it's Trump to a tee...
"The findings further suggest that the chaos these individuals create are a way to protect themselves against failure."
or in actual real life...
"The president’s raging narcissism has created chaos in the White House, and it has driven away scores of advisers, staff members, and others who had hoped to serve productively in his administration. As is usually the case with narcissists, Trump has worn out his welcome. He has disappointed and alienated many of the people with whom he has worked closely, as narcissists eventually do."
So, if it is all about Politics, then please explain why this is not happening across the Nation, being that the vast majority of Cities are run by Democrats?
Just because you don't see it or read about it doesn't mean it's not happening. Wait. Don't tell me you believed reporters standing in front of buildings on fire declaring mostly peaceful protests weren't lying. That's right up there with Ron White's description of a perfectly safe plane flight all the way to the crash site.
Actually it is true it is why we have all of the video's etc and all the media reports.
leftist denial fallacies are no longer valid.
You continue to make my points.
He has been unable to stop them, means he can't. We vote for people to be presidents so they can solve problems. What good are they if they can't.
Determination and a second term is useless. If you could not get things done in the first time, what good is a second term. Things will just get worse.
Get someone into office that can solve the problems is what it is all about. Evidently, Trump cannot solve problem. He is useless.
pretending COVID was a hoax is the kicker.
.
For the sake of answering your post, let me say that you are 100% correct. Nonetheless, that means that Trump is unable to get unity among all citizens of the United States. A second term would mean things would "get worse". It also suggests that the only way to fix the problem is to get rid of ALL Democrats. Given that is an impossibility and a negative solution, it does suggest that someone else might do a better job and unifying. A nation that is split in half is not a healthy nation.
Now President Trump beat Hillary back in 2016, some still say he actually didn't.
If the left has any chance to defeat Trump in 2020, it's probably time to move on.
Wouldn't it be better if those in opposition just stop?
But, of course, if they did then you wouldn't be able to blame Trump for something that's not his fault.
Your party has done more illegal and unethical crap to unseat Trump than most could've imagined possible. This tacit endorsement of rioting, burning, and looting is beyond the pale. Don't cry about unity when your party is the source of the discord. Change your political leaders, temper your lust for power, and promote unity. You might also consider fielding good candidates rather than demented ones and stark, raving lunatics.
The meme that it's somebody else's fault isn't flying. People can see.
What does that have anything to do with the OP?
And trump and.his racist rhetoric has nothing to do with it?
And.trumps.refusal to address the racial profiling and use of.excessive force by the police has nothing to do with it.
The demographic of inner cities dictate where this trouble will manifest itself
It does not matter how much you complain about the other side. It is what it is. A leader is needed to fix it. Trump said "I am the only one that can fix it" and he has not been able to do it. Lets try someone else. Trump has FAILED. It really is as simple as that.
I see. Let me ask you a stupid question. Have you ever stopped or will ever stop your support for Trump?
No, Mycroft, people don't stop doing what their beliefs tell them to do. That is why there is supposed to be a leader, a mediator, a peacemaker to make both parties come together for the common good.
still missing the actual point i see.
I directly addressed a post. Your post.
"Democrats close to Joe Biden increasingly fear the looting and violence in cities could help President Trump, especially among the few undecided or wavering Americans."
From previously posted link from LW Axios.
Only a dolt would not know that those people are not going to state this on the record, but you can be sure that the Dem friendly stenos at Axios got it off the record.
Trump has offered. Your people have refused help, so it's on you. You're simply lying, and no amount of rhetoric will turn that lie into truth. You surely know this, but you dutifully ran here to repeat what you think might salvage your party's tacit endorsement of the chaos. The polls have you worried. You should be. You're reaping what you've sewn.
So...people who have no interest in stopping their active opposition, even to the point of inflaming division, and have no interest in coming together for the common good are not to blame for the current division...while the one man who constantly offers to work together to reduce divisions is to blame because he can't lead those in opposition into coming together.
sigh...
In effect, you are saying, "We are going to do everything we can to make you fail and we are going to blame you for not making us stop trying to make you fail."
Accepting the presidency is not about a compromise but about leading. The Democrats were not the ones having to pledge allegiance to the U.S. To lead, protect, and keep the U.S. safe. Trump is the one that took the oath. The onus of success or failure is on him. No commitment was made by the Democrats. The commitment was made by Trump and he has failed.
If you are brought in to solve a problem and you can't, do you blame the problem or yourself for not being able to fix it? Duh!
Mycroft, it seems you live in an island all by yourself and never had any contact with other people. This kind of answer is ridiculous. People have different opinion and beliefs. That is normal. Few people think exactly like others and when you have 330 million people you will find millions of different ways of thinking and doing things. It is not up to me to fit what you want me to do, it is up to you as the leader and the head of the company to come up with a plan where we can work together to accomplish something you think is the right thing to do. You are not paying me a salary so you cannot fire me. I don't work for you. You want us to work for a common goal and it is the goal you want, you need to compromise with me in order for me to want to do it. you tell me I am wrong, I tell you screw you. You need to prove to me that I am wrong before I even consider working for you under those conditions.
By the way, this explanation is not just about Trump but about anyone you work, live,, and have relationship with. It is human nature. You cannot make me do what you want me to do just because you want me to do it.
Geez, you need to learn the basics of life before you opine. These are basics that apply to every singly living human being, including all animals.
Just stop. When your political leaders waited three months to condemn violence the average American could do the first day, you lost the argument. Moreover, your party still has local and state leaders refusing to do anything significant to stop that violence. Trump has offered assistance, and they've refused it. You're going to have to live with what you've created. If the afflicted cities are burned to the ground, it's the leaders in those places that are responsible when they cynically dismiss the offers of mraningful help to stop it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?