- Joined
- Jan 8, 2018
- Messages
- 10,940
- Reaction score
- 2,426
- Location
- God's country
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Lol, your ignorant statement is dismissed.
i think there was fraud
in any case, it hardly matters. Our system was set up long ago and it is a great system... keeps big cities from electing our president when most people, i'm guessing, do not live in cities
but even if most did, that doesn't mean
mob rule is OK
Mob rule applies to the removal of personal liberties. The potus cannot take away your constitutional rights. Disenfranchising large swaths of the population is much closer to mob rule.
Only people too stupid to vote get “disenfranchised “.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
RememberI put no stock at all on the democrats posting here. The people will make Trump win.
Lol...i see you doubled down on your ignorant statement...dismissedNothing ignorant in this exchange except that an adult is still using “Lol”.
There was no other reason to watch a Bernie “rally”.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I am sure that is not an accurate statement. (that people won't hear from him again'Trump doesn't even think Trump will win.
Trump now talks what he'll do after he'll lose the election.
"You won't hear from me again," he told his followers.
Lol...i see you doubled down on your ignorant statement...dismissed
And here we have the GOP’s entire national strategy boiled down to its essence.
Absolutely, its what your statement deserves. Good ole LOL because of how ignorant it is.You were previously dismissed. Sorry about that....
And you doubled down on lol.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So every time you “think” someone is being disenfranchised, remember who is stupid.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You do realize that we're still heavily in the mix of you and the rest of your camp. Being sore loses, going of for over three years now. Correct?And yet, if Trump loses that is exactly what he will do. Trump is ALWAYS a sore loser.
I put no stock at all on the democrats posting here. The people will make Trump win.
I put no stock at all on the democrats posting here. The people will make Trump win.
Does that not seem like a somewhat petty way to go about this?I'm not convinced Biden will win, but it's not a sure win for Trump either. And if he does win again, it will be like last time. An EC win, but not a Popular win. Without a popular win it cannot be said that "the people" made Trump win, just the system.
I shall recall who is stupid.
Please stop with the predictions.Trump most likely will win because he's going to steal the election. And this country is ****ing finished if that happens.
And kiss your Social Security good bye pal when that happens.
Please stop with the predictions.
Because after 2016, I think I can speak for everyone when I say that yours and the rest of the lefts fortune telling powers. Are more than just a little busted.
It seems like a rather accurate way to go about this. I have stood in support of the Electoral College, I think that it is necessary and just because one wins the popular vote doesn't mean they should win the EC vote, nor that they are qualified to represent the Republic as a whole. That being said, there is a difference between saying The People, which is an aggregate of us all and thus implies popular response, and the system we have in the EC to elect the President. Any President, regardless of party, who wins the EC but not the Popular Vote, cannot claim they are there by the will of the People. The EC is specifically there to balance popularism of the aggregate with the sovereignty of states.Does that not seem like a somewhat petty way to go about this?
It seems like a rather accurate way to go about this. I have stood in support of the Electoral College, I think that it is necessary and just because one wins the popular vote doesn't mean they should win the EC vote, nor that they are qualified to represent the Republic as a whole. That being said, there is a difference between saying The People, which is an aggregate of us all and thus implies popular response, and the system we have in the EC to elect the President. Any President, regardless of party, who wins the EC but not the Popular Vote, cannot claim they are there by the will of the People. The EC is specifically there to balance popularism of the aggregate with the sovereignty of states.
Mentally ill, corrupt, mother ****er...It's not a prediction, it's a ****ing guarantee. Trump will attempt to steal this election. Whether or not he succeeds is the only question now. God help us if he does succeed. Nobody in their right mind wants 4 more years of this mentally ill, corrupt mother ****er.
It's not a ****ed up system. The major cities aren't the important aspects of the Republic. The entire Republic matters, and thus the EC is the compromise between popularism and the sovereignty of States. The more populated States still have the most EC votes, but one cannot ignore the middle of America to win office on a Federal level such as President.Do you realize that if Biden wins the popular vote by 3%, he only has a 46% chance of winning the electoral college?
That's a ****ed-up system, any way you slice it.
Even though "the will of the people" did get them to the presidency?It seems like a rather accurate way to go about this. I have stood in support of the Electoral College, I think that it is necessary and just because one wins the popular vote doesn't mean they should win the EC vote, nor that they are qualified to represent the Republic as a whole. That being said, there is a difference between saying The People, which is an aggregate of us all and thus implies popular response, and the system we have in the EC to elect the President. Any President, regardless of party, who wins the EC but not the Popular Vote, cannot claim they are there by the will of the People. The EC is specifically there to balance popularism of the aggregate with the sovereignty of states.
The "Will of the People" is a popular position and implies the aggregate popular vote. So the "will of the people" does not get one to Presidency who does not win the popular vote. The Electoral College gets one to Presidency who does not win the popular vote. If one wins the Electoral College and also captures the popular vote, they can then be said to be there by the Will of the People.Even though "the will of the people" did get them to the presidency?
Because it sounds oddly reminiscent of those people who kept clamoring that he was not their president, simply for not wining the popular vote. Which, given the case of 2016. Hillary only won the popular vote by a incredibly slim margin. So all in all, it just sounds like another way to try and delegitimize what was a legitimate action.
Mentally ill, corrupt, mother ****er...
Yeah, that sounds exactly like the opposite of a sane argument. Not to mention that you're attempting to say that he's going to steal the election, when you couldn't even prove that he stole the first one. And now we have to deal with the issues if this election being blown too far out of proportion.
You're also actively wrong about who, or for that matter, how many want him to keep being president. Because with Joe showing that he doesn't' have the spine to stand up to the people who propagated the riots and the other democrats actively supporting them. Far more people are interested in the premise of law & order, and getting all of this back under control.
Can you actually name a reason of policy, as to why you're not voting for the man?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?