- Joined
- Jun 27, 2017
- Messages
- 3,747
- Reaction score
- 1,703
- Location
- Snohomish, WA
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
So you were ok with Trump trashing the Kahns and John McCain? They aren't conservative enough for you or something???
HE IS NOT putting them in JAIL. He is requesting DUE PROCESS of the LAW. Get it straight a Prosecution IS NOT a Judgement NOR is it a GUILTY Verdict. It is the Finality of a judgement for a suspected criminal act.
IF HRC and Comey ARE guilty of a crime FOUND THROUGH the Prosecution in which HRC and Comey's Defense is NOT enough to prove their innocence then they GO to JAIL. But to FORGO the WHOLE judicial process when there is an ACTUAL crime that was committed YET no adjudication to the Crime THAT... is a 2 tier justice system. PERIOD.
Im sorry.... I have served with MANY Brothers and Sisters in arms..... the Kahns on my opinion do NOT necessarily represent the feeling of their SON that gave their LIVE. And USING their SON and the Gold Star Family mark as an opportunity to critisize the president is a blatant disrespect to not only the office of the POTUS, BUT to other Gold Star Families and POTENTIALLY the SON Whom Took an OATH to protect and defend the constitution. Secondly to Follow ALL orders given from above. WHOM the POTUS holds the highest rank of Commander In Chief.
Prophecy fulfilled.
I heard a round table discussion over 9 years ago on some TV show discussing who might give a presidential run in the next decade.
Trump's name came up.
They had universally decided Trump would not do well because he is a billionaire and used to people jumping when he snapped his fingers.
As Prez, he would have to work with people and compromise to get things done.
That is the nature of politics.
They all agreed, even if he sat in the oval office, he would have troubles because he does not know how to compromise.
Prophecy fulfilled.
but....(my spin on this)...but, even all of those seven panel members could not predict all the rabid hate some have for those citizens who merely did not vote for Hillary.
2016 was the very first time I was personally & physically attacked for voting my choice in an election.
...and the attacks still continue from those who feel a right and obligation to destroy anyone who did not vote the way they did.
I must say, this was the very first time I have seen this.
Their TDS can not separate me for the candidate. We are both hated equally.
This is an entirely new mindset I have not seen before.
I have no hate for them, but they have truckloads of it for me, just because i did not vote the way they wanted me to.
This is something new and tells me they hate the way our government works in the election process and want to personalize it with anyone they meet who does not think the way they do.
Though it has been that same process for decades.
Stop blabbering MSM talking points, what has Trump did that makes him a dictator, was it that prison reform
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Really??? Did you forget the Saturday night massacre?? Wasn't that trying to impede the investigation?? Or are we calling it something different now??
Hillary was investigated 9 times - you just don't like the damn answer.
What??? Demanding that someone that multiple investigations that found that there was insufficient evidence to justify the bringing of criminal charges be prosecuted anyway. Is not due process. That's presumption of guilt. It's also political intimidation and really an actual witch hunt.
1. LOL! Department policy is the same as saying workplace or company policy. Yes if you violate the policies of your employer you are subject to being sanctioned or penalized for it. Such as suspension, demotion, censure, termination, etc. Not criminal charges or sanctions.
2. I didn't tell you specifically to shut up and thank you for service but it really doesn't mean anything as far this conversation is concerned.
3. Multiple people besides just Lynch and Comey throughout the multiple levels of the FBI and DOJ that have conducted and overseen the investigation reached those conclusions as well.
4 a,b, and c. All those thing were addressed in the Inspector General's report. And while Inspector General was not pleased with Comey bucking DOJ standard practices by announcing the determination and Lynch's semi-recusal in deferring to the Director and the presence of Ms Mills. The IG also made the determination that none of those had unduly influenced or impacted the decisions made in the course of the investigation and he set out some recommendations for policy or practices reinforcement and or modifications to them. Th IG was also critical of Mr Comey's unorthodox statement explaining why charges were not brought forward saying that in doing so the rights of Ms Clinton were negatively impacted. Sessions misstated the nature of contacts with Russians to a US Senator and he played a prominent role in the Trump campaign which the special counsel is charged with investigating. His recusal was proper.
And finally yes Ivanka finds herself in a similar fix of using a private email account and your last paragraph is too stupid to be deserving of any further comment. Just simply refer back to #2.
Hillary was investigated 9 times - you just don't like the damn answer.
So you were ok with Trump trashing the Kahns and John McCain? They aren't conservative enough for you or something???
NO I do NOT agree with Trump trashing the Kahns, BUT they went on National TV. You put up you take what you get.
McCain, Just because he was a Veteran, HAD his unique life in place, does NOT mean he is absolved from any criticism PERIOD. IF he is WILLING to criticize someone, he should be prepared to TAKE the same back.
Trump LACKS Class... I agree.... But you giveth.... you taketh........ So its on him to own that. BUT from my perspective I am even MORE discussed with the Kahns personally as if I could ask the SON.... RIGHT now. If he actually supports what his parents did.... its a 50/50 chance it could go either way........So using his their son's death as a platform is a little disgusting in my book more so TO disrespect the OFFICE of the PRESIDENT.
Hillary had classified documents on her private server. That is a know FACT. Hillary destroyed emails that were subpoenaed. That is a known crime. Comey leaked classified documents to a profess to leak to the press. That is a crime. Emails that ended up on a computer owned by a pedophile pervert. That is a misuse of his office and obstruction of justices. Another crime. What crime has Trump done? {That's not a rhetorical question.}Well actually he doesn't believe that at all. It should apply to nearly everyone BUT him.
There is that distinction.
Isn't that a tad hypocritical?? Don't you do exactly the same thing??
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?