• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump tells Iran ‘make a deal or it’s war’

j brown's body said:
Take the capital, then we can talk. But right now, you're just not in the same league.
Click to expand...
Taking the capitol doesn’t matter, especially when you flail around for the next couple decades getting embarrassed by guys who don’t even have a tank to their name.
 
Risky Thicket said:
If it helps any, I never, never assume that Paradoxical has read anything. At all. Ever. If it is a very small article he might glance at it, though not highly likely. Even then don't assume he understands what he read.
Click to expand...
I did take the time to read it because it was an outlandish headline

Trump tells Iran ‘make a deal or it’s war’​


and I doubted that Trump would ever say such a thing, so I went to your article:

Donald Trump has given Iran 60 days to agree a nuclear deal or face military action.

The US president’s demands were set out in a letter to his Iranian counterpart Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Politico reported, citing multiple sources.

Steve Witkoff, Mr Trump’s envoy, is in Oman this weekend to begin negotiations with Abbas Araghchi, Tehran’s foreign minister, the first such talks between the US and Iran in more than a decade.

Iran said on Friday it was giving the high-level nuclear talks “a genuine chance”.

In a sign of the difficult road ahead for negotiators, the White House reiterated Mr Trump’s threat on Friday, saying he wants Iran to know there will be “all hell to pay” if it does not agree to abandon its nuclear programme.

Mr Witkoff was quoted by the Wall Street Journal as saying the administration’s “red line” is to stop Iran from being able to produce a nuclear weapon and that dismantling its nuclear programme is the opening demand. But he suggested Washington would be open to “other ways to find compromise.”

The Iranian foreign ministry said on Friday the US should value the Islamic Republic’s decision to engage in talks despite what it called Washington’s “prevailing confrontational hoopla”.

“We intend to assess the other side’s intent and resolve this Saturday,” Esmaeil Baghaei, foreign affairs spokesman, said. “In earnest and with candid vigilance, we are giving diplomacy a genuine chance.”

Majid Takht-Ravanchi, Iran’s deputy foreign minister, was quoted by the semi-official news agency ISNA as saying: “Without threats and intimidation from the American side, there is a good possibility of reaching an accord.”

In his first term, Mr Trump scrapped the deal reached by the Obama administration, which would have required Iran to limit its stockpiles of enriched uranium.

The Obama deal, which was dismissed by Mr Trump and Iran hawks in Washington, would have also subjected Iran’s nuclear installations to inspection and verification.

It ends with



“If the Iranian regime does not want a deal, the president will pursue alternatives.”

Now then, you have seen firsthand as is everyone else seeing why the great and famous Paradoxical insists on excerpts. Here you posted a headline and logically all should presume you read it because you took the time to make a whole thread about it. NOWHERE in the article does it say anything close to what the headline says of "Lets make a deal or it's WAR! He did say military action but that is now "war" and everyone knows this because a war requires an act of Congress and targeted strikes are not war. I am only bothering to take the time to expose this article as typical of the left ALWAYS spreading fear and hate which are the top two indoctrination tactics. That aside, I also wanted to prove I was right in demanding excerpts. Had you included an excerpt everyone could see the article was just trying to get clicks.

PS. I hope this helps.
 
Tigerace117 said:
Taking the capitol doesn’t matter, especially when you flail around for the next couple decades getting embarrassed by guys who don’t even have a tank to their name.
Click to expand...

Tell, Putin, he's the one who said it. He knows a thing or two about bringing other countries under his yoke.
 
Tigerace117 said:
The U.S. failed so spectacularly it didn’t even finish leaving before everything collapsed.

Unlike the Soviets.
Click to expand...

Your country was never the same. It was soon destroyed.

Great work!
 
A US president is screwing up badly at home so they want to start a war to distract the population from the problems he has created for them, and promote nationalism which in itself is a distraction from all the Presidents failings in delivering positive domestic policies.

Gosh!! Never seen that before! :unsure: :cool::ROFLMAO:
 
Tigerace117 said:
This doesn’t actually prove anything, much less what you claimed.
Click to expand...

Either way, when your boys take Kiev, we can talk about US's failures. In the meantime, try digging out of your own.

Oh, that's right, talking about US's failures IS how you try digging out of your own.
 
j brown's body said:
Either way, when your boys take Kiev, we can talk about US's failures. In the meantime, try digging out of your own.

Oh, that's right, talking about US's failures IS how you try digging out of your own.
Click to expand...
Either way, the U.S. got its ass kicked by a much weaker enemy, then abandoned the people who risked their lives to help it.

Ahh, but I forget. To people like you they don’t matter in the slightest.
 
Tigerace117 said:
Either way, the U.S. got its ass kicked by a much weaker enemy, then abandoned the people who risked their lives to help it.

Ahh, but I forget. To people like you they don’t matter in the slightest.
Click to expand...

This isn't getting you any closer to Kiev.

Have a nice night. :)
 
Tigerace117 said:
Your inability to debunk any of what I pointed out is noted.
Click to expand...
Why would I waste time to do that? They are laughably stupid. No debunking needed
 
Tigerace117 said:
Your utter failure to disprove any of it says otherwise ;)
Click to expand...
Only lazy unintelligent people don't prove their own posts and expect others to disprove them
 
ncguy said:
Only lazy unintelligent people don't prove their own posts and expect others to disprove them
Click to expand...
Claiming I haven’t “proven my posts” when you haven’t even remotely attempted to address them is laughable.
 
Tigerace117 said:
Claiming I haven’t “proven my posts” when you haven’t even remotely attempted to address them is laughable.
Click to expand...
No action is required on my part to address your lack of Proof duh
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom