Gee, in case you didn't notice, you can have an insurgency with a small number of individualsGee, in case you hadn’t noticed insurgencies can’t exist as “random individuals”. They need a fundamental level of support from the general population.
You do know that China is not part of indochina right.You squealed that the U.S. failure in Cuba was because it “only committed a few resources”.
It committed vastly more and still lost in Indochina, so that’s clearly false.
I’m “defecting” now? According to who?
Again the fact the Ukrainians haven’t had any significant success for well over a year shows that to be an utter falsehood.Again the Ukrainians, you know the people actually using that equipment disagree with you.
I never ran from your bs. That is a straight up lie. Add that to the long list.
China? Apparently the U.S. military didn’t teach even basic geography, since we are talking about Cuba, which is nowhere near China.You do know that China is not part of indochina right.
That I have to explain this to you is painful.
You claimed we fought Vietnam like we fought WW2. When I called out that lie you immediately pivoted to talking about how we had every military advantage.You cried “lies all lies”. That isn’t an argument, much less one with “goalposts.”
So you think two completely different situations are the same. Got it. Can’t say I am surprised.You squealed that the U.S. failure in Cuba was because it “only committed a few resources”.
It committed vastly more and still lost in Indochina, so that’s clearly false.
I’m “defecting” now? According to who?
You still need sizable civilian support for even a small number of insurgents to operate successful dude.Gee, in case you didn't notice, you can have an insurgency with a small number of individuals
So you have no proof of your claim lol
They claim to have field hospitals but the reality is much different.We’ve already established your claims about Russian losses are meaningless, because you try and deny they even have field hospitals.
All you have are vague weasel words lolYou still need sizable civilian support for even a small number of insurgents to operate successful dude.
Everyday they stop your hero’s the Russian military from taking over their country is a great success.Again the fact the Ukrainians haven’t had any significant success for well over a year shows that to be an utter falsehood.
You ran as fast as you could, unable to cope with the reality America is deeply racist on every level.
Yes, we did. That is unequivocal. Khe Sanh, for example, was intended by Westmoreland to be a standup WW2 style fight. The fact you apparently don’t know that demonstrates the depths of your ignorance.You claimed we fought Vietnam like we fought WW2. When I called out that lie you immediately pivoted to talking about how we had every military advantage.
Why you think lying is helping you here I have no idea.
Wow you caught an auto correct error. What am accomplishment for you.China? Apparently the U.S. military didn’t teach even basic geography, since we are talking about Cuba, which is nowhere near China.
Your total lack of knowledge on how insurgencies function is noted.All you have are vague weasel words lol
I knew you had nothing dude
Lol. Prove I lack knowledgeYour total lack of knowledge on how insurgencies function is noted.
You not bothering to make sure you are on the right side of the planet before you whine says a lot about your attention to detail…or lack there ofWow you caught an auto correct error. What am accomplishment for you.
I guess when you are getting embarrassed as tightly as you are you need to take any win possible. No matter how pathetic.
You clearly didn’t know insurgencies require civilian support to function, for starters.Lol. Prove I lack knowledge
Without weasel words
Gee, after all that talk about the Russians’ supposed “incompetence” no it isn’t. If the Russians are that bad they should be winning easily.Everyday they stop your hero’s the Russian military from taking over their country is a great success.
More lies from you. How unsurprising.
Your own articles prove they have field hospitals dude. Trying to deny it is just silly.They claim to have field hospitals but the reality is much different.
No we did not.Yes, we did. That is unequivocal. Khe Sanh, for example, was intended by Westmoreland to be a standup WW2 style fight. The fact you apparently don’t know that demonstrates the depths of your ignorance.
Based on what. Your vast military knowledge and experience. lol. You are embarrassing yourself. As usual.Gee, after all that talk about the Russians’ supposed “incompetence” no it isn’t. If the Russians are that bad they should be winning easily.
They aren’t. Not even close.
The U.S. strikes into Laos and Cambodia, which consisted of immense amounts of ordinance, didn’t actually hinder communist forces there and in Cambodia arguably strengthened the Khmer Rouge, so that clearly isn’t even remotely true.No we did not.
We had vast restrictions on where we would bomb. We would allow the north Vietnamese military safe sanctuary in off limits areas and we made no attempt to take over the NV capital.
All vast differences between Vietnam and WW2.
And one battle does not replace a strategic strategy.
Maybe has you made it past basic training you would understand that. So you should probably stop talking about ignorance.
More wails of “no no no” because you can’t handle facing reality.Based on what. Your vast military knowledge and experience. lol. You are embarrassing yourself. As usual.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?