• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump tells Iran ‘make a deal or it’s war’

Tigerace117 said:
Gee, in case you hadn’t noticed insurgencies can’t exist as “random individuals”. They need a fundamental level of support from the general population.
Click to expand...
Gee, in case you didn't notice, you can have an insurgency with a small number of individuals
So you have no proof of your claim lol
 
Tigerace117 said:
You squealed that the U.S. failure in Cuba was because it “only committed a few resources”.

It committed vastly more and still lost in Indochina, so that’s clearly false.

I’m “defecting” now? According to who?
Click to expand...
You do know that China is not part of indochina right.

That I have to explain this to you is painful.
 
I hope that the military tells him to gfh.
 
braindrain said:
Again the Ukrainians, you know the people actually using that equipment disagree with you.

I never ran from your bs. That is a straight up lie. Add that to the long list.
Click to expand...
Again the fact the Ukrainians haven’t had any significant success for well over a year shows that to be an utter falsehood.

You ran as fast as you could, unable to cope with the reality America is deeply racist on every level.
 
braindrain said:
You do know that China is not part of indochina right.

That I have to explain this to you is painful.
Click to expand...
China? Apparently the U.S. military didn’t teach even basic geography, since we are talking about Cuba, which is nowhere near China.
 
Tigerace117 said:
You cried “lies all lies”. That isn’t an argument, much less one with “goalposts.”
Click to expand...
You claimed we fought Vietnam like we fought WW2. When I called out that lie you immediately pivoted to talking about how we had every military advantage.

Why you think lying is helping you here I have no idea.
 
Tigerace117 said:
You squealed that the U.S. failure in Cuba was because it “only committed a few resources”.

It committed vastly more and still lost in Indochina, so that’s clearly false.

I’m “defecting” now? According to who?
Click to expand...
So you think two completely different situations are the same. Got it. Can’t say I am surprised.
 
ncguy said:
Gee, in case you didn't notice, you can have an insurgency with a small number of individuals
So you have no proof of your claim lol
Click to expand...
You still need sizable civilian support for even a small number of insurgents to operate successful dude.
 
Tigerace117 said:
We’ve already established your claims about Russian losses are meaningless, because you try and deny they even have field hospitals.
Click to expand...
They claim to have field hospitals but the reality is much different.

 
Tigerace117 said:
You still need sizable civilian support for even a small number of insurgents to operate successful dude.
Click to expand...
All you have are vague weasel words lol
I knew you had nothing dude
 
Tigerace117 said:
Again the fact the Ukrainians haven’t had any significant success for well over a year shows that to be an utter falsehood.

You ran as fast as you could, unable to cope with the reality America is deeply racist on every level.
Click to expand...
Everyday they stop your hero’s the Russian military from taking over their country is a great success.

More lies from you. How unsurprising.
 
braindrain said:
You claimed we fought Vietnam like we fought WW2. When I called out that lie you immediately pivoted to talking about how we had every military advantage.

Why you think lying is helping you here I have no idea.
Click to expand...
Yes, we did. That is unequivocal. Khe Sanh, for example, was intended by Westmoreland to be a standup WW2 style fight. The fact you apparently don’t know that demonstrates the depths of your ignorance.
 
Tigerace117 said:
China? Apparently the U.S. military didn’t teach even basic geography, since we are talking about Cuba, which is nowhere near China.
Click to expand...
Wow you caught an auto correct error. What am accomplishment for you.

I guess when you are getting embarrassed as tightly as you are you need to take any win possible. No matter how pathetic.
 
braindrain said:
Wow you caught an auto correct error. What am accomplishment for you.

I guess when you are getting embarrassed as tightly as you are you need to take any win possible. No matter how pathetic.
Click to expand...
You not bothering to make sure you are on the right side of the planet before you whine says a lot about your attention to detail…or lack there of

I guess when you are as used to being humiliated and then running away squealing victory as the U.S. military is you take whatever straws you can grasp at
 
braindrain said:
Everyday they stop your hero’s the Russian military from taking over their country is a great success.

More lies from you. How unsurprising.
Click to expand...
Gee, after all that talk about the Russians’ supposed “incompetence” no it isn’t. If the Russians are that bad they should be winning easily.

They aren’t. Not even close.
 
Tigerace117 said:
Yes, we did. That is unequivocal. Khe Sanh, for example, was intended by Westmoreland to be a standup WW2 style fight. The fact you apparently don’t know that demonstrates the depths of your ignorance.
Click to expand...
No we did not.
We had vast restrictions on where we would bomb. We would allow the north Vietnamese military safe sanctuary in off limits areas and we made no attempt to take over the NV capital.
All vast differences between Vietnam and WW2.

And one battle does not replace a strategic strategy.
Maybe has you made it past basic training you would understand that. So you should probably stop talking about ignorance.
 
Tigerace117 said:
Gee, after all that talk about the Russians’ supposed “incompetence” no it isn’t. If the Russians are that bad they should be winning easily.

They aren’t. Not even close.
Click to expand...
Based on what. Your vast military knowledge and experience. lol. You are embarrassing yourself. As usual.
 
"Art of the Deal!"
 
The U.S. strikes into Laos and Cambodia, which consisted of immense amounts of ordinance, didn’t actually hinder communist forces there and in Cambodia arguably strengthened the Khmer Rouge, so that clearly isn’t even remotely true.

The U.S. didn’t invade North Vietnam because that would have been an idiotic idea.

None of which changes the reality Khe Sanh was entirely intended to be a WW2 style battle to destroy much of the NVA, and wound up being anything but.

Gee, the humiliating defeats the U.S. military suffered in Indochina shows that to be even more laughable false.
 
braindrain said:
Based on what. Your vast military knowledge and experience. lol. You are embarrassing yourself. As usual.
Click to expand...
More wails of “no no no” because you can’t handle facing reality.

If the Russians were actually as incompetent as claimed, the Ukrainians should be winning easily.

They aren’t even close.
 
Commander "Bone-Spurs" is also a warmonger? Whooda thunkit?

But then again, Chump does need a huge distraction after the disastrous past few weeks.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.