• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump team appeals ruling about Fani

Lutherf said:
IKR? I mean, like, why do people accused of crimes keep trying to say they're innocent? Why don't they just shut the **** up and take their punishment like everyone else does? It's like these idiots think there was ever some innocent person that got put in jail. That's never happened!!! If you accuse somebody it's because they did something and you have perfectly good reason to want them locked up! The idea that government should stand in the way of us getting what we want is, like, totally lame. They work for us and if we want some mother****er in jail then government HAS to do that!!!
Click to expand...
I do the sarcasm thing too, however, this is one of those things where a lighter touch works better. My suggestion is that you try to be more concise.
 
Lol here we go with the op trying to kick the football again.

Maybe some day you will learn..today wasn't it
 
ClaraD said:
So, the Bar cannot disbar her for something that has not been proven factually true in a court.
Click to expand...

Not true, Attorney's are disbarred for ethics violation and for failure to act in a responsible manner as an Officer of the Court all the time.

If the Bar takes up the complaint for review instead of rejecting it. Then there will be a hearing (non-Judicial) where both sides are present, can submit "evidence", can call witnesses, and the attorney is subject to questioning.

WW
 
JasperL said:
Guilty of what exactly? For sure ethical lapses, but nothing they did compromised Trump's rights as a defendant. The problem was her hiring her lover as a member of the prosecution team. As I've said it's idiotic and reckless, but once he's not on the city's payroll, the 'conflict' ends as far as the defense is concerned.
Click to expand...
This entire Willis matter is a politically contrived controversy.

Lead by the trump sycophants, MAGA RNC money inorder to protect a man that requires continuous protection from lawyers due to his corruption.

The average citizen on trial would not even know that a DA met and fell in love with a fellow prosecutor. Then appointed that prosecutor. Which has absolutely no bearing on this case.

Through money, press releases, Trump's mouth and Rightwing talking heads, a ridiculous narrative created against Willis. Sadly, even non trump persons buy into this nothingburger Willis narrative
 
ClaraD said:
She spoke truth and that’s not slander
Click to expand...
That speech is going to cause her all sorts of problems. Another example of poor decision making.
 
ClaraD said:
Nah it really won’t she didn’t opine on his innocence or guilt
Click to expand...
The question is whether she made comments having a substantial likelihood of causing or increasing public condemnation of him. The answer is yes, she did.
 
ColdHardTruth said:
It has nothing to do with Fanni.

It has to do with the cheeto and his hate of dark-skinned people.
Click to expand...
That'll go down as one of the stupidest comments in the history of the galaxy. I have no doubt you'll be able outdo yourself.
 
Taylor said:
The question is whether she made comments having a substantial likelihood of causing or increasing public condemnation of him. The answer is yes, she did.
Click to expand...
She spoke to receiving racist hate mail and attacks by his supporters
 
WorldWatcher said:
Not true, Attorney's are disbarred for ethics violation and for failure to act in a responsible manner as an Officer of the Court all the time.

If the Bar takes up the complaint for review instead of rejecting it. Then there will be a hearing (non-Judicial) where both sides are present, can submit "evidence", can call witnesses, and the attorney is subject to questioning.

WW
Click to expand...
Provide an example where a private relationship got an attorney disbarred
 
samiam5211 said:
She lied under oath.

I know you don't believe that. There really isn't any point in us arguing about it. The truth will come out.
Click to expand...

Still betting on her getting indicted for perjury?
 
Taylor said:
§ 51-5-4

Try harder next time.
Click to expand...
So what is the possible criminal penalty? None.

It's a civil violation, not a crime. She doesn't have immunity against defamation. Do you have a point?
 
ColdHardTruth said:
It has nothing to do with Fanni.

It has to do with the cheeto and his hate of dark-skinned people.
Click to expand...


It certainly has something to do with Fani's terrible decision to engage in a personal relationship with Wade.
 
And McAfee accepts. Now the Trump team has 10 days to submit their case to the appeals court and the appeals court has 45 days to accept or not. If they decline, Trump can take the appeal to the GA supreme court.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom