• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump says Iran and Israel agree to a ceasefire

Okay, so you mean the Republican who shot up the Walmart in Texas expelling "invaders" then?
Don't know about any Republican who did that?
Is that your latest barb to throw against Trump after his victory in the Middle East?
Sounds pretty weak to me?
 
Don't know about any Republican who did that?
Is that your latest barb to throw against Trump after his victory in the Middle East?
Sounds pretty weak to me?
What about the Republican who shot up the Pittsburgh synagogue to fight “globalists”.

The victory he was cursing Iran and Israel for ignoring? LOLOLOLOL
 
That would be an incredibly stupid way to go about things. Whether you don’t like him or not he’s still calling shots.
No he isn’t. Stephen Miller is. In the case of our new war , Bibi is. Both enemies and allies know how to play Trump.
 
That would be an incredibly stupid way to go about things. Whether you don’t like him or not he’s still calling shots.

His mental faculties are rapidly declining. He is not calling the shots anymore.
 
Trump is a bad leader. It’s not that we hope he fails, we just know it’s inevitable.

Also, **** Trump. **** that piece of shit. He is a bad person and he is the most hateful person in the country. He is a sniveling piece of shit. He is not a good person, and when someone constantly does bad things you must hold that person account. You should hate a person who does bad things. **** him. He’s corrupt piece of shit. And there’s something off about any person who looks up to a piece of shit like that.

How many crimes does that piece of shit have to commit before you realize he’s a criminal?


Comical.
 
Yes. Bombing the Iranian nuclear facilities was a political victory.
All the previous presidents who are on record stating Iran cannot have nuclear capabilities would think so.
Too bad if you can't see that.
And I hope it leads to more agreements between Israel and more countries in the Middle East.
Well, TDS is a very real thing, (a lot of false pride fuels it) hence, why some will not admit that Trump succeeded with the above mission, and also came out of it with a political victory. He is being praised across the world despite their lies.
 
All the previous presidents who are on record stating Iran cannot have nuclear capabilities would think so.

, why some will not admit that Trump succeeded, and also came out of it with a political victory. He is being praised across the world despite their lies.
“What victory lap??’ LOLOLOLOL
 
Trump is a bad leader. It’s not that we hope he fails, we just know it’s inevitable.

Also, **** Trump. **** that piece of shit. He is a bad person and he is the most hateful person in the country. He is a sniveling piece of shit. He is not a good person, and when someone constantly does bad things you must hold that person account. You should hate a person who does bad things. **** him. He’s corrupt piece of shit. And there’s something off about any person who looks up to a piece of shit like that.

How many crimes does that piece of shit have to commit before you realize he’s a criminal?
Wow! You should go over to one of Hari Seldon's posts and copy/paste some of his comical epithets hurled against Trump.

According the law based on the latest lawfare attack at Trump, we know technically Trump is a criminal. What's your point for bringing that up?
 
Wow! You should go over to one of Hari Seldon's posts and copy/paste some of his comical epithets hurled against Trump.

According the law based on the latest lawfare attack at Trump, we know technically Trump is a criminal. What's your point for bringing that up?
When you’re technically a criminal it means you’re a criminal in fact. He was a grifter before you ever voted for him.
 
Why should I when it's finally sinking in to the heads of average Americans that they're being used by a foreign government that has been undermining their interests both financially and defensively, and has operated without restraint, challenging world peace and American values with indiscriminate ambushes, sadistic methodologies against neighboring nations and occupied people, blatant assassinations on foreign soil, and capricious, irresponsible missile attacks and bombings to try to embroil good Americans in their unworthy agenda


Your posts drip of antisemitism whether you acknowledge it or not. In your world Israel is evil and the cause of unrest in the ME.
 
Your posts drip of antisemitism whether you acknowledge it or not. In your world Israel is evil and the cause of unrest in the ME.
The current Israeli government is evil. They’re committing genocide and waging war in the region. Bibi needs forever wars because he’s constantly under investigation for corruption at home. Hiding behind anti-semitism to deflect criticism of Israel’s government is in and of itself antisemitism.
 
You mean like all those Republicans in Charlottesville and Jan 6?
Why do we need fake comparisons when we have the real thing? We're even seeing the same "restorative justice" meted out to Mad Lib offenders that was bestowed on too many Mad Lib protesters from the Summer of Love.

 
Why do we need fake comparisons when we have the real thing? We're even seeing the same "restorative justice" meted out to Mad Lib offenders that was bestowed on too many Mad Lib protesters from the Summer of Love.

I do not understand what you're arguing nor why I'd want to read an op-ed from the Washington examiner, which is basically a coloring book for maga?
 
The current Israeli government is evil. They’re committing genocide and waging war in the region. Bibi needs forever wars because he’s constantly under investigation for corruption at home. Hiding behind anti-semitism to deflect criticism of Israel’s government is in and of itself antisemitism.


Case in point.

Just laughable and not worth a serious discussion.
 
As of today, the truce between Iran and Israel appears to be holding despite initial violations by both sides.
Let's hope this continues.
Well, some of us will hope the path to peace proceeds, even in spite of reactionary elements in both Iran and Israel pushing back.

Others here (mentioning no names) were hoping to see Israel turned into a radioactive hole in the ground, so I don't imagine they'll be joining us.
 
Yes. Bombing the Iranian nuclear facilities was a political victory.
Too bad if you can't see that.
Odd. It doesn't seem that way even within the MAGAverse. I'm curious to hear your rationale on how it was a victory rather than an own goal Trump is trying turn into something it isn't. Of course he started off with a handicap because much of the threat Israel was citing in terms of uranium enrichment was a direct result of Trump's withdrawal from the JCPOA. The bombing's results are still in question because there's still no verification on the extent of the damage, specifically to Fordo since the only real way of knowing is on site inspection. There are questions around the centrifuges as well, because we have no accounting of what was there and what may have been moved. If that makes this a political victory, I guess those who think so can celebrate. To everyone else this is a bit of a crap show.

And I hope it leads to more agreements between Israel and more countries in the Middle East.
Interestingly enough, this has had more of a negative impact because Israel's attacks have not been well received in the Middle East, which makes it harder for countries interested on broader relations with Israel harder to accomplish.
 
Would you please explain further why you believe Iran continues to be the victim in all this? I think I speak for many here when I say we would enjoy reading more from you.
Thanks for your comment; my limited understanding of events across the Middle East is based firstly on reading Noam Chomsky's books and articles; lately I find myself asking "Where's Chomsky when we really need him."

Retired US General Wesley Clark revealed a five-year plan that he was shown in the Pentagon weeks after 9/11/2001:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wesley_Clark#Book_on_modern_wars

"In Clark's book Winning Modern Wars, published in 2003, he describes his conversation with a military officer in the Pentagon shortly after 9/11 regarding a plan to attack seven countries in five years: 'As I went back through the Pentagon in November 2001, one of the senior military staff officers had time for a chat. Yes, we were still on track for going against Iraq, he said. But there was more. This was being discussed as part of a five-year campaign plan, he said, and there were a total of seven countries, beginning with Iraq, then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and finishing off Iran.'"

This five-year plan which has now reached Iran appears to owe a great deal of its strategic thinking to an Israeli thinker named Oded Yinon who wrote in the 1980s about the weaknesses of Arab countries:

"...by citing what he perceives to be flaws in their national and social structures, concluding that Israel should aim to bring about the fragmentation of the Arab world into a mosaic of ethnic and confessional groupings."

Possibly the concept of "Greater Israel" requires Iran to be fragmented into its ethnic and religious groupings in a way similar to the destruction we've already seen in Iraq, Libya, and Syria.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yinon...that the Iran,the lines of the administrative
 
I do not understand what you're arguing nor why I'd want to read an op-ed from the Washington examiner, which is basically a coloring book for maga?
The article includes facts about particular Portland Antifa accused of crimes. Have you information that the "coloring book" was incorrect in some particulars? It also includes facts about the judge who seems more than willing to give violent criminals a slap on the wrist to serve "restorative justice." What aren't you following?
 
Back
Top Bottom