• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump says he is suing Twitter, Facebook, Google and CEOs Dorsey, Zuckerberg, Pichai

j-mac said:
I know they have the right to join a class regardless of how it triggers you.
Click to expand...


LOL... Only if the judge allows you to join the class... Federal court isn't a kindergarten... Back to the question, what do you know about the other plaintiffs in this case and their claims in this lawsuit?
 
BlueTex said:
LOL... Only if the judge allows you to join the class... Federal court isn't a kindergarten... Back to the question, what do you know about the other plaintiffs in this case and their claims in this lawsuit?
Click to expand...
Appears that the class was certified. Now what cha got?
 
j-mac said:
Appears that the class was certified. Now what cha got?
Click to expand...


LMAO... The case was just filed yesterday, how the hell has the class been certified? You just making this up as you go along?
 
notquiteright said:
My money is on fund raising stunt. He claims to be rich enough to shun a pay check during his time in office but begs for money constantly from his sheeple... :rolleyes:

He has a long track record of not paying his lawyers- ask Rudi. So no cost fundraising scam... ✌️
Click to expand...

And a cry for attention.
 
LMAO once again we are in the same spot when this nonsense comes up about Twitter, Facebook, Instagram etc.

500+ posts

Even though nobody ever has a factual answer Ill ask again
can anybody tell me what legality is out there to punish me (Twitter, Facebook, Twitter, debate politics) and infringe on my rights and force me to allow people on my property against my will based on popularity?

What laws say I have to let everybody on my property and to say whatever they want?

😁 🍿
 
AGENT J said:
LMAO once again we are in the same spot when this nonsense comes up about Twitter, Facebook, Instagram etc.

500+ posts

Even though nobody ever has a factual answer Ill ask again
can anybody tell me what legality is out there to punish me (Twitter, Facebook, Twitter, debate politics) and infringe on my rights and force me to allow people on my property against my will based on popularity?

What laws say I have to let everybody on my property and to say whatever they want?

😁 🍿
Click to expand...


But, but Alan (He kept his underwear on) Dershowitz.... :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:
 
j-mac said:
Liberalism? It sure is...lol
Click to expand...
You can try to divert away from the Trump Cult. But it doesn't change the fact that it's a cult.

Hell, I bet you have your membership card.
 
CaughtInThe said:
You can try to divert away from the Trump Cult. But it doesn't change the fact that it's a cult.

Hell, I bet you have your membership card.
Click to expand...
Lol...and they say libs have no sense of humor...
 
Sagittarius83 said:
A

Agreed but it appears that you are saying these platforms clearly have a political agenda.

I am saying that why would these platforms care about political speech unless they somehow feel threatened by this type of speech.
Click to expand...


Every organization has political interests that it will seek to enhance,
 
j-mac said:
So are unhinged progressive liberals...
Click to expand...
So unhinged that identifying a cult and an insurrection is unhinged.

Maybe just admit you're in a cult. The truth can set you free.
 
CaughtInThe said:
So unhinged that identifying a cult and an insurrection is unhinged.

Maybe just admit you're in a cult. The truth can set you free.
Click to expand...
Sure, when you admit you're a vile anti American troll
 
I
tres borrachos said:
So like all good Trump supporters, you now hate the free market.
Click to expand...
I did not vote for Trump when I was living in the states in 2016 and of course did not vote at all in any American election in 2020.
I am involved in politics here now, none of which involves Trump of course.
So I am confused as to why I am a “Trump supporter”.
 
Sagittarius83 said:
I

I did not vote for Trump when I was living in the states in 2016 and of course did not vote at all in any American election in 2020.
I am involved in politics here now, none of which involves Trump of course.
So I am confused as to why I am a “Trump supporter”.
Click to expand...

So you oppose Trump. Interesting. You may want to work on your postings to reflect that.
 
Sagittarius83 said:
Again what you are describing is physical trespass.

May I ask what is your definition of dangerous content. One might remember the Nazi view of degenerate art or the prohibition of jeans in present North Korea. Where is the line?
Click to expand...
It isn't my definition that matters. Twitter said that Trump inciting the insurrection on their platform was dangerous content. It's their platform. They get to decide.
 
Lord Tammerlain said:
Every organization has political interests that it will seek to enhance,
Click to expand...
Agreed but organizations that virtually corner the market for speech like the ones mentioned in this thread have much greater influence.

If YouTube or the other biggies did not allow speech supporting say abortion or other causes you admire would you not be crying foul?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom