- Joined
- Oct 12, 2022
- Messages
- 7,566
- Reaction score
- 10,285
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
That's King TACO to us peasants.It’s the TACO way of ‘evolving his policy positions’.
That's King TACO to us peasants.It’s the TACO way of ‘evolving his policy positions’.
That's King TACO to us peasants.
Exactly what I thought of your response.Dumb response.
Why add that unnecessary step?
We can know who the non citizens are by processing them where they live like Reagan did. Making them leave and come back is unnecessary and just plain stupid.Exactly what I thought of your response.
Why, because legal entry should be the only means by which one should not be deported without due process, and a government should know who are the non citizens in the country.
It’s the TACO way of ‘evolving his policy positions’.
What was stupid is allowing the issue to grow so large.We can know who the non citizens are by processing them where they live like Reagan did. Making them leave and come back is unnecessary and just plain stupid.
Oh, and what Reagan did, did not resolve the issue. Did it?We can know who the non citizens are by processing them where they live like Reagan did. Making them leave and come back is unnecessary and just plain stupid.
Democrats keep trying to fix it with comprehensive reform.What was stupid is allowing the issue to grow so large.
IT helped.Oh, and what Reagan did, did not resolve the issue. Did it?
Fix it how?Democrats keep trying to fix it with comprehensive reform.
republicans always block it.
Does that end illegal entry?IT helped.
What we beed is comprehensive reform and streamlining of our immigration laws so that the labor our economy needs can come legally in the first place.
But Republicans always block that.
Read the last bill that was bi parrisan, until Ttump told them to block it.Fix it how?
If we let them come legally to fill the labor needs of our economy, that would largely end illegal immigration.Does that end illegal entry?
And that bill would have put an end to illegal entry to the U.S.?Read the last bill that was bi parrisan, until Ttump told them to block it.
Itvwould have been a big improvement.And that bill would have put an end to illegal entry to the U.S.?
And what I've proposed would do just that.If we let them come legally to fill the labor needs of our economy, that would largely end illegal immigration.
Then border patrol could focus on the tiny percentage that come with nefarious purposes rather then spending all their time busting hard working farm hands and hotel maids
That would be your opinion.Itvwould have been a big improvement.
No need tp naje the ones already hete wirking leave and come back.And what I've proposed would do just that.
It was the opinion of a bi, partisan majority until Trump told Republucans he wanted the campaign issue not a solution and they tanked itmThat would be your opinion.
As I said it begins a precedence to be followed.No need tp naje the ones already hete wirking leave and come back.
that is just stupid.
So lets start anew and resolve the issue permanently.It was the opinion of a bi, partisan majority until Trump told Republucans he wanted the campaign issue not a solution and they tanked itm
A stupid unnecessary precedent.As I said it begins a precedence to be followed.
So lets start anew and resolve the issue permanently.
Then the other option would allow them to remain illegally with consequences.A stupid unnecessary precedent.
Have some common sense.
If they are here working and contributing then we obvioudly need them, let them stay, doccume t them. Making them leave and come back is just stupid. It defies vommon sense.
Nonsense.Then the other option would allow them to remain illegally with consequences.