• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump: I have 'absolute right to pardon myself'

If you want to know why I think he has the authority to pardon himself you should of asked that. I don't know why trump thinks whatever it is he thinks beyond what he has said. My name aint hannity, I don't talk to him on the phone.

Sent from my SM-T800 using Tapatalk

If you claim that you don't know why trump said that he believes he has the power to pardon himself, then you're using the feigning of stupidity as a debate tactic. That has got to be the all time saddest way to defend one's position there can be.
 
...and, if you use your power to obstruct justice, its obstruction of justice.

which you would think would be the reasoning to block proprietorial discretion, but it isn't. Would Mueller be guilty of obstruction of justice if tomorrow he just said "**** it, I'm done"?
 
See In re Murchison. It's the DOJ's official position that no man can be a judge in his own case for a reason.

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/349/133/case.html

Trump can certainly try pardoning himself, but all he would accomplish is putting the country through yet another headache. Which, I know, is a good chunk of the reason for why people voted for him.

Under what authority would a judge override a pardon? Under what authority would a judge or jury ignore a pardon? Neither exist.

If tomorrow Trump pardoned everyone who was ever convicted of drunk driving, listing every single name, could anyone stop it? I don't think they could, their only recourse would be to impeach Trump, but that doesn't change the fact that the pardon exists already.

Like I said, its a great exercise for people to sit around a fire, smoking pipes and cigars.
 
Last edited:
The president--any president--would be impeached before any criminal trial takes place, therefore removing his executive authority, including pardoning power.

The issue is ****ing stupid.

The president can pardon people for crimes they've yet to be indicted for so in theory he could pardon himself before he's impeached.
 
The president can pardon people for crimes they've yet to be indicted for so in theory he could pardon himself before he's impeached.

Has that ever happened?
 
...and, if you use your power to obstruct justice, its obstruction of justice.
A pardon by denifition can not obstruct justice. It is a mechanism of our justice system.

Sent from my SM-T800 using Tapatalk
 
Under what authority would a judge override a pardon? Under what authority would a judge or jury ignore a pardon? Neither exist.

If tomorrow Trump pardoned everyone who was ever convicted of drunk driving, listing every single name, could anyone stop it? I don't think they could, their only recourse would be to impeach Trump, but that doesn't change the fact that the pardon exists already.

Like I said, its a great exercise for people to sit around a fire, smoking pipes and cigars.

This thread deals with pardoning himself, not other people.
 
Frankly I think Obama thought of himself, Hillary and their henchmen as above the law. I mean, they broke the law for our own good, didn't they? :lol:

All you ever bring is but but Obama, but but Hillary.
 
This floats among the many things that innocent people don't tend to say.

This statement alone put him in violation of his oath of office and warrants impeachment. This makes Richard Nixon look like Mr. Rodgers.
 
Has that ever happened?

The President's pardon power is not limited by the Constitution to people who have been convicted. In Ex Part Garland (1866) the Supreme Court found that

The Constitution provides that the President 'shall have power to grant reprieves and pardons for offences against the United States, except in cases of impeachment.'

The power thus conferred is unlimited, with the exception stated. It extends to every offence known to the law, and may be exercised at any time after its commission, either before legal proceedings are taken, or during their pendency, or after conviction and judgment. This power of the President is not subject to legislative control.
 
Can you imagine the outrage from Trump type supporters if Obama had said this? Trump is basically saying he is above the law.

We don't have to imagine it. Remember the right-wing reaction to the killing of Anwar al-Awlaki? That guy was an actual terrorist trying to kill Americans who had joined a terrorist group in another country and they still flipped out as if Obama had violated his constitutional rights.
 
If you claim that you don't know why trump said that he believes he has the power to pardon himself, then you're using the feigning of stupidity as a debate tactic. That has got to be the all time saddest way to defend one's position there can be.
You don't know why either

Sent from my SM-T800 using Tapatalk
 
There's nothing in the Constitution that says he can't though it would violate at least two foundations of our legal system: no man is above the law and no may is his own jury. As a practical matter it doesn't matter. He couldn't avoid impeachment and once out of office if someone wanted to prosecute him they'd find a way.

That's pretty much what I figured.

Remove him from office and buh-bye presidential privilege.
 
That's pretty much what I figured.

Remove him from office and buh-bye presidential privilege.

For sure, but there is no expiration on a Pardon, nor can it be ignored. But a Pardon needs to be specific to a crime, of which none has been found.

Like every statement or topic that revolves around Trump, its quite a bit of hyperventilating and then we move on.
 
He can't be impeached for excercising his constitutionally authority.

He can be impeached for parting his hair on the wrong side, you might want read up on the topic.
 
Back
Top Bottom