- Joined
- Jul 17, 2022
- Messages
- 26,772
- Reaction score
- 20,424
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
If you actually had any on your side.I will take case law over the opinion of a retired Swamp Bureaucrat (dipshit) any day
If you actually had any on your side.I will take case law over the opinion of a retired Swamp Bureaucrat (dipshit) any day
Obama had access, No cameras. Russian operatives could have gotten in there easily. The NRA only acquired the facility. There were no records kept as to who went in there and as I said Obama had unfettered access because he was supposed to digitize the records, which STILL hasn't been done. For all I know, Obama has stolen all classified material there and selling it to the highest bidders.
Assume responsibility means diddly when Obama can go in and out at will.
Why are you struggling mightily with this topic?
But your entire argument originates form dipshits shouting crap on twitter.I did not post anything from twitter. In fact, I am old school and I do not have a twitter account!
You just demonstrated that you are too f**ing lazy to read what I posted, and you simply want to dismiss something you have not even read
You have the typical attitude of a dishonest hack
But your entire argument originates form dipshits shouting crap on twitter.
There was nothing in that post that says that anything comes from Trump's lawyers in their filings.That you were clueless when you tried to argue that he got this point from some guy in twitter.
He showed to you that this point comes from Trump's lawyers in their filings. You try to support Trump without even having a clue of what his lawyers have filed in court!
There was nothing in that post that says that anything comes from Trump's lawyers in their filings.
If you think there is, please provide a specific quote from whatever filing.
Obama had access, No cameras. Russian operatives could have gotten in there easily. The NRA only acquired the facility. There were no records kept as to who went in there and as I said Obama had unfettered access because he was supposed to digitize the records, which STILL hasn't been done. For all I know, Obama has stolen all classified material there and selling it to the highest bidders.
Assume responsibility means diddly when Obama can go in and out at will.
Why are you struggling mightily with this topic?
It is so weird to me, it really is. I think that both @paradoxial and @Mycroft are fairly intelligent. But they are poster children for the psychological research which shows that often facts simply change sway entrenched beliefs. Honestly, that they are even arguing what they argue is incredible, as it was in all the fruitless discussions over Covid masking and vaccines.
I have even tried asking them what would change their minds and they never respond. Because, they cannot even admit that no amount of contrary evidence would sway their opinion. That's a scary, scary thing.
Regarding the NARA. It's irrelevant, disagreement there (every president has them) would be a pure civil matter. It became irrelevant when the Left/Democrats sent their Gestapo to raid a political opponents home.Do not tell me anything about my argument before you read it and quote it!
Unless you want to troll...
Regarding the NARA. It's irrelevant, disagreement there would be a pure civil matter. It became irrelevant when the Left/Democrats sent their Gestapo to raid a political opponents home.
Leftist, as a pure political matter: Please keep doing crap this. Most Americans now know who the real American authoritarian thugs are, keep proving it.
Give me a quote.He gave you the link with Trump's legal RESPONSE
What is the title of the document my clueless MAGA supporter?
DONALD J. TRUMP’S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO THE UNITED STATES’ MOTION FOR A PARTIAL STAY PENDING APPEAL
Do not feed the sealions.Give me a quote.
Give me a quote.
Maybe you...and Post...should get back in tune with what Post said: "Trump declared Obama's E.O. applied to him...".
HE gave it to you IN BOLD!!
READ IT IN HIS POST
Trump: I could declassify documents by thinking about it
It says in the EO that classification authorities have to go through a process outlined in the EO. As I tried to explain to @Mycroft, the EO lists the President as one of said classification authorities. Now, some people argue that Presidents are not subject to EOs even if the EO says that...debatepolitics.com
Do you want me to spell it to you too?
Why? That's your idiotic point to make, and nobody else's.Maybe you...and Post...should get back in tune with what Post said: "Trump declared Obama's E.O. applied to him...".
Three posters turned the thread into a MAGA rally, a presentation of serial projection and associated disinfo.Obama had access, No cameras. Russian operatives could have gotten in there easily. The NRA only acquired the facility. There were no records kept as to who went in there and as I said Obama had unfettered access because he was supposed to digitize the records, which STILL hasn't been done. For all I know, Obama has stolen all classified material there and selling it to the highest bidders.
Assume responsibility means diddly when Obama can go in and out at will.
Why are you struggling mightily with this topic?
Maybe you...and Post...should get back in tune with what Post said: "Trump declared Obama's E.O. applied to him...".
Trump declared no such thing...in fact, he has declared the opposite. I'm still waiting for something from Post to justify his statement.
I'd match him up with your Lawrence Tribe any day.
But that's the phenomenon I'm referring to.I will have to disagree
See Mycroft's response and tell me if you seriously think that he is fairly intelligent poster.
The guy gets the information right in his face and still struggles with comprehending it!
What do you find confusing about this sentence; "only designated officials within the DoE may declassify Restricted Data"? Do you see any mention of 'except the POTUS' anywhere in the following? POTUS does not have unlimited powers, no matter how hard you wish, and there are good reasons for restricting his/her authority. Can you think why that might be?
Powers of the president of the United States - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Too bad he didn't and instead just stole top secret docs. What a dumbass.The President can declassify anything that a Dept. under his Executive Authority can classify
The EO is directed at agencies and individuals that are subordinate to the President. The President can follow the procedures outlined in the EO...if he wants to...but he doesn't have to. And THAT is what Trump has consistently said. Furthermore, court rulings support what he says.His lawyers declared in court that Obama's EO applied to him.
READ HIS BOLD QUOTE which comes from the legal filings of his lawyers.
President Obama enacted the current Executive Order prescribing the parameters for controlling classified information in 2009. See Exec. Order 13526 (Dec. 29, 2009). That Executive Order, which controlled during President Trump’s term in office, designates the President as an original classification authority. See id. § 1.3(a)(1). In turn, the Executive Order grants authority to declassify information to either the official who originally classified the information or that individual’s supervisors—necessarily including the President. § 3.1(b)(1), (3). Thus, assuming the Executive Order could even apply to constrain a President, cf. 50 U.S.C. § 3163, the President enjoys absolute authority under the Executive Order to declassify any information.
The red part is equivalent to what Post told you. Trump declared Obama's E.O applied to him!
You continue to demonstrate how clueless you are about even the position of your side! You do not understand what they argue. You are just parroting things you hear without really understanding what is going on
Too bad he didn't and instead just stole top secret docs. What a dumbass.
Haha, good luck with that horseshit. Especially a week after a judge said Trump had to prove he declassified documents.There is no required process for Presidential declassification.