CaughtInThe
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2017
- Messages
- 148,898
- Reaction score
- 171,435
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
When we find out everything it's going to be 100% mafia.Hmmm... it's not suspicious at all the MBL gave Kushner $2 billion over the objections of his advisors. Not suspicious at all. not even a little bit. Nope, that transaction looks clean as a whistle.
I think because the people who have sat in the oval office in modern times were deeply respectful of the office. Nixon's lies and Clinton's bj notwithstanding.Assuming this is true, how was he/whoever able to get and/or walk out the door with this stuff? Is anyone asking THAT question?
Don't get me wrong: if even half of whatever Trump is accused of taking is true, it's bad for him and wrong and he should face the full weight of the legal system. However, if he (or whoever) was just able to access and walk out with this stuff...why is that not being addressed as well?
Assuming this is true, how was he/whoever able to get and/or walk out the door with this stuff? Is anyone asking THAT question?
Don't get me wrong: if even half of whatever Trump is accused of taking is true, it's bad for him and wrong and he should face the full weight of the legal system. However, if he (or whoever) was just able to access and walk out with this stuff...why is that not being addressed as well?
Assuming this is true, how was he/whoever able to get and/or walk out the door with this stuff? Is anyone asking THAT question?
Don't get me wrong: if even half of whatever Trump is accused of taking is true, it's bad for him and wrong and he should face the full weight of the legal system. However, if he (or whoever) was just able to access and walk out with this stuff...why is that not being addressed as well?
Assuming this is true, how was he/whoever able to get and/or walk out the door with this stuff? Is anyone asking THAT question?
Don't get me wrong: if even half of whatever Trump is accused of taking is true, it's bad for him and wrong and he should face the full weight of the legal system. However, if he (or whoever) was just able to access and walk out with this stuff...why is that not being addressed as well?
They have been, until tRump, mostly beyond reproach as far as national security and similar things.Assuming this is true, how was he/whoever able to get and/or walk out the door with this stuff? Is anyone asking THAT question?
Don't get me wrong: if even half of whatever Trump is accused of taking is true, it's bad for him and wrong and he should face the full weight of the legal system. However, if he (or whoever) was just able to access and walk out with this stuff...why is that not being addressed as well?
Democrats tried to address Trump's criminal behavior twice. Republicans did not vote to do anything about him.Assuming this is true, how was he/whoever able to get and/or walk out the door with this stuff? Is anyone asking THAT question?
Don't get me wrong: if even half of whatever Trump is accused of taking is true, it's bad for him and wrong and he should face the full weight of the legal system. However, if he (or whoever) was just able to access and walk out with this stuff...why is that not being addressed as well?
Assuming this is true, how was he/whoever able to get and/or walk out the door with this stuff?
Who was going to stop him? He was POTUS and had surrounded himself with ass kissing sycophants. Even the Trump allies are telling us he routinely walked out of secure areas with classified documents to take them to the personal residence of the WH, so the abuse of the system was rampant. I don't know why anyone would expect that given the disregard he showed for classified documents there would be a good record of what he had or didn't have, and I don't know of anyone that could have searched his stuff before getting it carted away down to Florida.Assuming this is true, how was he/whoever able to get and/or walk out the door with this stuff? Is anyone asking THAT question?
Don't get me wrong: if even half of whatever Trump is accused of taking is true, it's bad for him and wrong and he should face the full weight of the legal system. However, if he (or whoever) was just able to access and walk out with this stuff...why is that not being addressed as well?
Who says that it is not being addressed?Assuming this is true, how was he/whoever able to get and/or walk out the door with this stuff? Is anyone asking THAT question?
Don't get me wrong: if even half of whatever Trump is accused of taking is true, it's bad for him and wrong and he should face the full weight of the legal system. However, if he (or whoever) was just able to access and walk out with this stuff...why is that not being addressed as well?
How is it that you can't figure out that he had help?
Thats why its important to elect an honest person in office.
That doesn't answer the question/solve the puzzle. We're not talking about run-of-the-mill stuff here....like Trump's post-it notes of reminders or whatnot. We're talking about nuke stuff & CIA agent payrolls (again: if true). Stuff like this...doesn't sound like just anyone can access and walk out the door with.
No such thing. It's always going to be the lesser of two evils.Thats why its important to elect an honest person in office.
Right the least dishonest.No such thing. It's always going to be the lesser of two evils.
"Who is the least dishonest POS? That guy? Okay..i guess i'll vote for him."
I suspect you are correct.I am not someone who handles highly classified information, but...
the expected difficulty of removing these sorts of things seems to rule out the possibility that these documents ended up at Trump's by accident or carelessness or even negligence
Correct, if there ends up being corruption in favor of trump over the constitution, that should be rooted out.Assuming this is true, how was he/whoever able to get and/or walk out the door with this stuff? Is anyone asking THAT question?
Don't get me wrong: if even half of whatever Trump is accused of taking is true, it's bad for him and wrong and he should face the full weight of the legal system. However, if he (or whoever) was just able to access and walk out with this stuff...why is that not being addressed as well?