• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump: evacuate Tehran

Pretty damn callous statement. Have you renounced your humanity?ol

BTW.... I would say that same about Trump's tweat, but we all know the man is devoid of humanity and decency (he is actually a rather dark and scary fellow, maybe on par with the Joker), I just hope you are not following blindly along.

It's just reality, a reality created by the insane Iranian leadership
 
I doesn't matter. The people represents the goverment and the goverment represents the people. It's an equivalence relationship.
That also applies to your country?
 
No, there is no indication that Israel or the US is ready to launch a nuclear strike against Iran. In fact, both countries have spent decades trying to prevent an exchange of nuclear weapons. Iran, on the other hand has made it clear they would use a nuclear weapon against Israel in order to wipe it off the face of the earth.

“We must attack without provocation because they might attack without provocation in some nebulous future” is not a strong argument.
 
No, there is no indication that Israel or the US is ready to launch a nuclear strike against Iran. In fact, both countries have spent decades trying to prevent an exchange of nuclear weapons. Iran, on the other hand has made it clear they would use a nuclear weapon against Israel in order to wipe it off the face of the earth.
Declaring they should “evacuate Tehran”— an utterly monumental feat— once again suggests otherwise. The president of the United States saying so is ominous at best, especially given the movement of US forces and the ongoing conflict.

Uh....no they haven’t. Israel helped apartheid South Africa, for example, get nukes.
 
It's just reality, a reality created by the insane Iranian leadership
Iran trying to get nukes is anything but insane, as had they had nukes America would not dare to be threatening to nuke Tehran currently.
 
I doesn't matter. The people represents the goverment and the goverment represents the people. It's an equivalence relationship.

So you think the Islamic Republic of Iran is a true representative democracy? LOL. You must also think that Russia and N Korea are representative governments too! 🤣 🤭 (y)

What the people there really think:

 
Likely just a ploy to escape the G7 where he actually had to interact with leaders face to face rather than hide behind Truth Social. He simply can not intelligently discuss the issues with them he is so woefully uninformed.
 
That also applies to your country?
It applies to every country. The people not only have a right but also an obligation to overthrow the goverment if it's seriously broken can cannot be corrected through peaceful means.
 
The dark irony here is that if we do this, then there is a high probability that Taiwan, South Korea or some other nation will nuclearize by the end of Trump’s term. There can be no clear message than the following: if you don’t have or otherwise choose to give up nuclear weapons, you are at risk of being run over by nuclear weapon, state, and no one will come to your age in a meaningful way. We see this in Ukraine, we see this in Iran, we see this with many of China’s neighbors in the south China sea, and the list goes on.
 
It applies to every country. The people not only have a right but also an obligation to overthrow the goverment if it's seriously broken can cannot be corrected through peaceful means.
What's the route for that to happen in the US? In Canada we were not satisfied with the Prime Minister so we replaced him.
How does that happen in the USA?
 
The people not only have a right but also an obligation to overthrow the goverment if it's seriously broken can cannot be corrected through peaceful means.
That apply to your country as well?
 
War means peace?



There should be no de-escalation, it would just be another pause in the ongoing war between Islam and the rest of the world. Israel is fighting to protect, not just it's own citizens, it's fighting to protect all of Europe and America. Isreal should accept nothing but unconditional surrender from Iran and their proxies.
 
The dark irony here is that if we do this, then there is a high probability that Taiwan, South Korea or some other nation will nuclearize by the end of Trump’s term. There can be no clear message than the following: if you don’t have or otherwise choose to give up nuclear weapons, you are at risk of being run over by nuclear weapon, state, and no one will come to your age in a meaningful way. We see this in Ukraine, we see this in Iran, we see this with many of China’s neighbors in the south China sea, and the list goes on.

The message was sent long ago.

If Iran had nukes, this isn’t happening.
 
What's the route for that to happen in the US? In Canada we were not satisfied with the Prime Minister so we replaced him.
How does that happen in the USA?

Pitchforks and torches.

We might also dump some perfectly good tea into the Boston Harbour for good measure.
 
He's just trolling Iran.


God, did I just say that?
Trumps an absolute idiot and needs to be removed from any semblance of government influence.
Americans have a job to do...

I think its mostly Trump wanting to be the center of attention. If reports are accurate some months ago Trump wanted to be the one to punish Iran and was talked out of it by Vance and Hegseth, among others. So he went into talks that went nowhere.

Now Bebe is stealing the limelight, the one who acted while Trump sat on the sideline. Naturally he wants to brag with "I told you so" as if he was the moving force.

In truth he is probably TACOing his prior belligerence and won't be doing what is necessary to back his threats: strike the deep underground bunkers that process Iran's weapons grade Uranium.

So he is content with strutting on the sidelines with the "I told you so" and more "blah. blah, blah..."
 
Last edited:
“We must attack without provocation because they might attack without provocation in some nebulous future” is not a strong argument.

You can't be serious? Israel has been threatened for decades with wiping the Jews and their Jewish state from the face of the earth, annihilation and desolation,
 
If I were in Tehran I would interpret that to mean that we're going to get nuked and the US will be the one to do it.
I am NOT so sure that he can find a Bomber Crew that will drop a nuke on anyone?

Certainly NOT on a nation that NEVER struck the Homeland...
-Peace
 
Back
Top Bottom