Trump: Discussing Biden probe with Barr would be 'appropriate'

[RealityNow]

Truth


Very true

 

[RealityNow]

People should be careful how they spin is these various posting.... "The Russian are at it early..... spreading asinine stuff".. be of no illusion, "other bad global actors" see how Trump supports the Russian and panders to Putin even after the known interference and the use of blogs, forums and society media to sow discord and mis information..... NOW, they too know they have a free reign to contort the minds of the uneducated and those who can't understand, digest and follow the truths that exist... they know and they have studied well how to target these types.

 

[foolardi]

Who here disputed the election results? Don't say "Leftists." Be specific. Because I don't recall a single Democrat disputing the election results.

Um how about The Loser in the Georgia Gubernatorial race.The name Stacy Abrams.
Not only did she outright accuse the *man running against her of cheating before ballots
were counted but she also refused to Concede.
In fact as late as March 14th after meeting with Joe Biden earlier on that day was
asked If she'e ever going to Concede the Georgia Governor's race.
She was heard to say " NO ".
This is the same Stacy Abrams who was highly praised by fellow Democrats and
was allowed to give the Rebuttal of this years SOTU address.

* Brian Kemp won Georgia by over 54,ooo votes,Hardly a squeaker.

 

[<alt>doxygen]

Um how about The Loser in the Georgia Gubernatorial race.The name Stacy Abrams.
Not only did she outright accuse the *man running against her of cheating before ballots
were counted but she also refused to Concede.
In fact as late as March 14th after meeting with Joe Biden earlier on that day was
asked If she'e ever going to Concede the Georgia Governor's race.
She was heard to say " NO ".
This is the same Stacy Abrams who was highly praised by fellow Democrats and
was allowed to give the Rebuttal of this years SOTU address.

* Brian Kemp won Georgia by over 54,ooo votes,Hardly a squeaker.

Brian Kemp was in charge of counting those 54,000 votes. And all of the others.

 

[foolardi]

Brian Kemp was in charge of counting those 54,000 votes. And all of the others.

He WAS the Georgia Secretary of State who is the one responsible for
Certifying a states vote tally..As was Katherine Harris in 2000 { Florida Recount } and in
2004 { Ken Blackwell } who was hampered by John Kerry also refusing to concede the
Ohio Results in traditional order.
Democrats traditionally accuse their opposition of Cheating and voter fraud with no
evidence to back it up.
Kemp was tough on election rules and against the exploitability of stuff Dems favor.
Like Automatic voter registration.Democrats rely on charges of Voter Suppression in order to
create a window of opportunity for hackers to change voter records which happened in
Minnestota allowing Al Franken to win.Also the way Black Congressman Alan West had
his Florida seat literally stolen from him.Al Gore made a mighty attempt to steal Florida
from Bush in 2000.Going so far as to push for not counting Overseas Military Ballots due to a
Post Office glitch as far as Dates.

 

[slick]

I have no idea'r what you mean.
Cite an example by posting what aggravates you.Show US what you are talking about.

He's aggravated by the evidence of your post #123, only that nothing else. The truth of Biden's influence during the Obama administration
in order to provide for his sons dismal prospects before Joe Biden used his influence put a happy face on his sons
up to that time ghastly, depressing expectations after being unceremoniously dismissed from the military for
cocaine usage!

 

[joko104]

So you think that Trump cares about the Constitution... LOL
How can you be this naive???
Yes, I can see several sectors of society including the armed forces balking at going along with an attempted coup like that. But I definitely don't put it past Trump, in terms of trying. The man has made several steps towards a dictatorship. He'd love absolute power. You know, his side for example has acknowledged that he wanted to implement some stupid moves like firing Mueller but his staff refused to go along with it.
My point is, this scenario the other user has mentioned is far-fetched and unconstitutional, sure. But my point is, don't think that Trump wouldn't try it. Likely (hopefully) he wouldn't succeed, given that maybe even the Republicans might have a drop of decency left, but are you really sure he wouldn't try? Don't be. That guy would try anything that would enhance his big ego and his narcissistic power trip. He actually has issued statements in this sense already; when the Chinese president grabbed power for life, Trump tweeted that this would be nice to have in America as well. Again, don't be naive. Seemingly, you don't know with whom you're dealing, in terms of what this guy is capable of.

:roll:

The election could just be a big waste if Democrats win as before the Congress confirmed the win, a 17 kilometer wide asteroid could hit in the middle of the USA, essentially killing all life on earth. I'm not saying it will happen, but it definitely could. Regardless, if Trump wins there is no doubt that Pelosi will have him assassinated with the Clinton's assassination squad - or at least she'll try.

 

[joko104]

People should be careful how they spin is these various posting.... "The Russian are at it early..... spreading asinine stuff".. be of no illusion, "other bad global actors" see how Trump supports the Russian and panders to Putin even after the known interference and the use of blogs, forums and society media to sow discord and mis information..... NOW, they too know they have a free reign to contort the minds of the uneducated and those who can't understand, digest and follow the truths that exist... they know and they have studied well how to target these types.

Why are you so pro-Putin in your messages to join him in wanting Trump defeated?

 

[RealityNow]

Why are you so pro-Putin in your messages to join him in wanting Trump defeated?

:damn

 

[<alt>doxygen]

Why are you so pro-Putin in your messages to join him in wanting Trump defeated?

You seem to have a way to find what Putin wants. How do you do that? What else does Putin want?

 

[foolardi]

Why are you so pro-Putin in your messages to join him in wanting Trump defeated?

The Russian People { citizens of Russia } are NOT an enemy of the United States.
In fact they are very much like Americans were during the Nuclear Family years of
the 50's.They like eating out and Big Weddings and taking vacations.Normal,
decent activities.Unlike the Irony facing Americans currently.With Homeless having
the run of blue state big cites as well Illegals.
We now have disruptiions within society.Not just the Crazed Goth Movement or
Kids growing up on Harry Potter.But flat-out Radical activism.
To prove my point about todays Russian there is a site called :
- Busty Russian Women -.
There are hundreds and hundreds of Family photos showing Russian Woman
on vacation,at Big Events like Weddings.In their modest homes or old style restaurants
and dance halls.
I Rest Me Case !

 

[poweRob]

We're here, now: We've officially arrived at the clearest and least ambiguous quality of an autocracy: the head of state using the powers of his office and the Federal government to directly persecute his political rivals.

I've been predicting here for several months that come 2020 the Democratic Primary winner, whoever that was, would be under investigation by the DOJ. The problem with that prediction was of timing and detail: it assumed that existing democratic guardrails would delay the point we now find ourselves at til some point down the road, and it necessarily assumed that the Presidential power that Trump would assert would be through the DOJ, though now we see that he's perfectly willing to use his powers via foreign affairs as well in order to accomplish the same end.

So now I have to move on to the next prediction, since my first one is shortly to be fulfilled a year ahead of schedule : if another Democratic candidate becomes the front runner, then that candidate will come under investigation or persecution by the President as well.



Trump: Discussing Biden probe with Barr would be 'appropriate' - POLITICO

Well this is falling apart in quick fashion. The Ukrainian prosecutor who claimed there was some there there about Biden is now claiming he never said that.

Ukraine Prosecutor Made Up Biden Claim, Kiev Lawmaker Says

 

[GreatNews2night]

:roll:

The election could just be a big waste if Democrats win as before the Congress confirmed the win, a 17 kilometer wide asteroid could hit in the middle of the USA, essentially killing all life on earth. I'm not saying it will happen, but it definitely could. Regardless, if Trump wins there is no doubt that Pelosi will have him assassinated with the Clinton's assassination squad - or at least she'll try.

This takes the cake. First prize for stupidest post I've ever read here, and that's something! So, congratulations on your prize, good sir!

 

[cpwill]

We're here, now: We've officially arrived at the clearest and least ambiguous quality of an autocracy: the head of state using the powers of his office and the Federal government to directly persecute his political rivals.

I wonder if they'll send false flag intelligence operatives to meet with Biden's campaign staff, or use flimsy crap evidence to get a FISA warrant approved against it.

Maybe later we'll even find senior law enforcement officially overseeing related efforts texting their mistresses about how they were going to find a way to stop Biden.

Yup. Unprecedented.

Sent from my Moto G (5S) Plus using Tapatalk

 

[Cardinal]

I wonder if they'll send false flag intelligence operatives to meet with Biden's campaign staff, or use flimsy crap evidence to get a FISA warrant approved against it.

Maybe later we'll even find senior law enforcement officially overseeing related efforts texting their mistresses about how they were going to find a way to stop Biden.

Yup. Unprecedented.

Sent from my Moto G (5S) Plus using Tapatalk

The president (Obama) didn’t order an investigation into his political rival.

The difference is not subtle.

 

[j-mac]

So you're against using these agencies as political weapons....until Trump uses them as weapons against Democrats. Sadly predictable.

So you're for using these agencies as political weapons....until Trump uses them as weapons against Democrats. Sadly predictable.

Sent from my SM-T587P using Tapatalk

 

[cpwill]

The president (Obama) didn’t order an investigation into his political rival.

The difference is not subtle.

1. That we know of - it has yet to be investigated

2. If he was unaware, that's not exactly much better.

3. The result remains the same: the legal and intelligence apparatus of the United States put to domestic use against political opponents. The only thing that would be unique is that finally it would be a Republican President doing it, instead of Democrats like Obama, Johnson, Wilson, etc.

 

[rocket88]

So you're for using these agencies as political weapons....until Trump uses them as weapons against Democrats. Sadly predictable.

Sent from my SM-T587P using Tapatalk

I didn't say I was. You, on the other hand, are getting yourself all giddy about investigating Dems because they were mean to the Messiah. Or at least, the poster I replied to was.

 

[rocket88]

1. That we know of - it has yet to be investigated

2. If he was unaware, that's not exactly much better.

3. The result remains the same: the legal and intelligence apparatus of the United States put to domestic use against political opponents. The only thing that would be unique is that finally it would be a Republican President doing it, instead of Democrats like Obama, Johnson, Wilson, etc.

Finally! The Republicans get to use the FBI as a political weapon. The Democratic Party will be outlawed, and there will be nothing to stop us from installing Trump as Emperor! All Hail Emperor Donald!

 

[justabubba]

So you're for using these agencies as political weapons....until Trump uses them as weapons against Democrats. Sadly predictable.

Sent from my SM-T587P using Tapatalk

sad ... in what way?
predictable ... in what way?

 

[Cardinal]

1. That we know of - it has yet to be investigated

I.e. "I have no idea if Obama ordered or directed an investigation into his political rival, but I'm going to assume he did so I can maintain my false equivalency argument."

2. If he was unaware, that's not exactly much better.

Whether or not he was aware of an investigation is irrelevant. It's the ordering or directing of such an investigation that would make it a scandal. And as you already pointed out above, you have no reason for assuming that he did.

3. The result remains the same: the legal and intelligence apparatus of the United States put to domestic use against political opponents. The only thing that would be unique is that finally it would be a Republican President doing it, instead of Democrats like Obama, Johnson, Wilson, etc.

Sorry, but simply being a Presidential candidate doesn't give you immunity from investigations for potential crimes. Putting your notion of criminal justice to work, all one would have to do to commit crimes with impunity is just be a Presidential candidate.

Also, your last sentence repeats the false assumption that Obama ordered or directed the investigation into Trump, which as you already admitted you have no reason for claiming.

 

[tres borrachos]

1. That we know of - it has yet to be investigated

2. If he was unaware, that's not exactly much better.

3. The result remains the same: the legal and intelligence apparatus of the United States put to domestic use against political opponents. The only thing that would be unique is that finally it would be a Republican President doing it, instead of Democrats like Obama, Johnson, Wilson, etc.

What makes you think Obama would have ordered investigations into Romney?

 

[cpwill]

What makes you think Obama would have ordered investigations into Romney?

I was describing the investigation/spying/whathaveyou on the Trump campaign.

Sent from my Moto G (5S) Plus using Tapatalk

 

[cpwill]

Finally! The Republicans get to use the FBI as a political weapon. The Democratic Party will be outlawed, and there will be nothing to stop us from installing Trump as Emperor! All Hail Emperor Donald!

If so, then Armed Rebellion would be justified.

Sent from my Moto G (5S) Plus using Tapatalk

 

[tres borrachos]

I was describing the investigation/spying/whathaveyou on the Trump campaign.

Sent from my Moto G (5S) Plus using Tapatalk

Trump was not Obama's political opponent. Obama was not on my ballot in 2016. I assume he wasn't on yours, either. Obama had 2 political opponents after his Senate races - McCain and Romney. And only Romney after he was in office and could even order any kind of investigation.