Yes.How do you 'know' that? Been there?
Of course it is, but my comment suits the discussion I was in.Nope, it's more than that.
@JoeB131 in Post 290. You'll have to read back quite a bit to understand it, though.Which poster made that claim?
As an inmate?Yes.
If you say so.Of course it is, but my comment suits the discussion I was in.
Post 290 is your reply. Explain or not.@JoeB131 in Post 290. You'll have to read back quite a bit to understand it, though.
Dachau doesn't have inmates. Hasn't for years.As an inmate?
The text in the light blue background is the other guys comment, under his handle, with a tiny arrow pointing up that'll lead you back to more of the discussion. If you're interested. Or not.Post 290 is your reply. Explain or not.
We were talking about Alligator Alcatraz, not Dachua. So you haven't been here? You should not be ashamed to admit that. Iow, you have no idea what is happening down there.Dachau doesn't have inmates. Hasn't for years.
Really don't need to go back, your diversions speak for themselves.The text in the light blue background is the other guys comment, under his handle, with a tiny arrow pointing up that'll lead you back to more of the discussion. If you're interested. Or not.
Sorry. I misunderstood. No, I haven't been to that part of the Everglades. All I know about the camp is the same thing all of the public knows.We were talking about Alligator Alcatraz, not Dachua. So you haven't been here? You should not be ashamed to admit that. Iow, you have no idea what is happening down there.
No, one doesn't have to worry about that. One has to worry if one has no food for the family and no way to get any, but not about your comment.
Yes, true. The 9% figures I quoted are obviously the percentage of those that have been adjudicated. 91% of those that were adjudicated during those three years were denied. The backlog is another matter. It will be improved by using qualified JAG's at places like Alligator Alcatraz, as Trump has suggested.
See? That's what I mean. I don't believe that such things are going to happen, so I don't worry about them. I doubt if you believe it either, but your politics makes you think that such an accusation is catchy and clever.Um, yes, I guess if you are a totally heartless person, you won't are when they start up the mass killings, like good little Nazis.
I'm going to take that as political clap-trap. So many people on the left don't bother to actually know anything that such lines become like slogans. One can almost picture some pimply-faced anarchist shouting it into a bull-horn, with mindless people who have nothing better to do shouting it back in unison, over and over.Right, throw out the darkies
See? That's what I mean. I don't believe that such things are going to happen, so I don't worry about them. I doubt if you believe it either, but your politics makes you think that such an accusation is catchy and clever.
I'm going to take that as political clap-trap. So many people on the left don't bother to actually know anything that such lines become like slogans. One can almost picture some pimply-faced anarchist shouting it into a bull-horn, with mindless people who have nothing better to do shouting it back in unison, over and over.
The German people weren't fooled. After Hitler became Chancellor, the German people were subjugated by force.And if people as smart as the Germans could be fooled,
What you've apparently missed is that I bothered to find out what the man had actually done that put him at risk. You, OTOH, seemed to think that he had just used a little dope to cope with PTSD. You had simply accepted what his advocates said. At this point, I hope he gets to stay here for his family's sake. If it were just him, I wouldn't care much whether he stays or goes.The fact that you are getting on here, rationalizing deporting Purple Heart Veterans and a Father of Five, shows you are the one who is following the "slogans" mindlessly.
The German people weren't fooled. After Hitler became Chancellor, the German people were subjugated by force.
What you've apparently missed is that I bothered to find out what the man had actually done that put him at risk. You, OTOH, seemed to think that he had just used a little dope to cope with PTSD. You had simply accepted what his advocates said. At this point, I hope he gets to stay here for his family's sake. If it were just him, I wouldn't care much whether he stays or goes.
I prefer to operate on the basis of information. Maybe that's because of my work experience. Others may prefer to operate on feelings. It is easier, but that kind of people get sucked in more often.
Germany had just endured runaway inflation, followed by the Great Depression. Hitler led the Nazi Party to the victory in 1932 that you mention on a platform of economic recovery. In 1933 he was named Chancellor. He imprisoned political opponents ("subjugated them by force") so he could pass a law giving him dictatorial powerActually, no, the NSDAP (Nazi Party) won the most seats in the Reichstag and formed an alliance with the DNVP (German National People's Party), another right wing party, to form a government. Please don't try to tell me that the Germans had no idea what the Nazis were about
A condition of immigration to this country is that one not have a criminal past or be a criminal after arrival. This man did a series of criminal acts after his arrival. Criminal grounds for deportation are primarily listed in INA § 237(a)(2). As applies to this man, multiple convictions are grounds for deportation. Gun offenses are another.Again, you are using a lot of rationalizations to justify what was done to him, things that wouldn't have gotten him in very much trouble if he had been a citizen.
I have not said anything done by the government was "OK." Nothing.HOw about a sensible rule.
Garcia has already been charged. It was necessary to effect his return per the SCOTUS order.
The issue is Garcia's potential deportation should he be released on bail. If he stays in jail, he won't be deported but will be prosecuted. If he's out on bail, it's doubtful he'd be prosecuted from wherever he is deported.
See? That's what I mean. I don't believe that such things are going to happen, so I don't worry about them. I doubt if you believe it either, but your politics makes you think that such an accusation is catchy and clever.
I'm going to take that as political clap-trap. So many people on the left don't bother to actually know anything that such lines become like slogans. One can almost picture some pimply-faced anarchist shouting it into a bull-horn, with mindless people who have nothing better to do shouting it back in unison, over and over.
Germany had just endured runaway inflation, followed by the Great Depression. Hitler led the Nazi Party to the victory in 1932 that you mention on a platform of economic recovery. In 1933 he was named Chancellor. He imprisoned political opponents ("subjugated them by force") so he could pass a law giving him dictatorial power
Apart from liberals thinking it's clever to refer to Trump as Hitler and the GOP as Nazis, there is absolutely no parallel between the two sets of circumstances or their outcome.
A condition of immigration to this country is that one not have a criminal past or be a criminal after arrival. This man did a series of criminal acts after his arrival. Criminal grounds for deportation are primarily listed in INA § 237(a)(2). As applies to this man, multiple convictions are grounds for deportation. Gun offenses are another.
This is not rationalization for why he should be deported, only legal grounds on which he may be. He did more than use a little pot for his PTSD.
I have not said anything done by the government was "OK." Nothing.
Now, how do you make a sensible law that applies to millions of different people from all over the world at different times. You can't. What you can do, and what has been done in this case, is to provide for an appeals process, during which the individual conditions can be examined and the individual opinions (sensibilities) of a judge can be applied. That's what's going on right now.
Yes, we're all caught up on that. What point are you trying to move forward here?
Hitler demonized the Jews as part of his campaign of promises to fix the German economy. It comes down toWhat you leave out of those Cliff Notes history is Hitler came to power, demonizing the Jews.
Nothing personal, but that's a pretty silly remark.Trump came to power by demonizing illegal immigrants.
That's not what happened. AFAIK, he hasn't denied any of the charges against him.Let's say some government official decided you were a real bung on his ass and decided he was going to use any legal excuse he could to throw you in jail. If you didn't actually do anything, no problem, we just promise a criminal a get out of jail free card to say you did.
You were doing pretty well right up until that.Or you can have a sensible rule that you don't enforce every case because Cheeto Hitler demanded a quota of 3000 a day.
Hitler demonized the Jews as part of his campaign of promises to fix the German economy. It comes down to
None of those conditions exist in this county.
- Inflation
- Depression
- Election
- Chancellorship
- Law enabling dictatorship
Nothing personal, but that's a pretty silly remark.
That's not what happened. AFAIK, he hasn't denied any of the charges against him.
You were doing pretty well right up until that.
I'm not an idiot.Um, no, it came down to using the Jews to rally Germans. I guess the main difference is Germany had real economic problems.
Trump just told you idiots you did, and you believed him.
No one over the age of about 4 believed that."They're eating the Cats!!!"
You're over the line again.I am putting out there that if you are going to ignore all humanity in the application of the law to appease Cheeto Hitler
If they felt the charges were warranted they’d prosecute him bail or no bail. They know the charges are bogus.Garcia has already been charged. It was necessary to effect his return per the SCOTUS order.
The issue is Garcia's potential deportation should he be released on bail. If he stays in jail, he won't be deported but will be prosecuted. If he's out on bail, it's doubtful he'd be prosecuted from wherever he is deported.
If he’s found not guilty (he will be) he won’t be deported.No, it didn't. He's still in jail and will stay there until 3 days before he's deported to some other country. Maybe So. Sudan?
Sure. And the administration is hard at work on that.
The fact is that he may not even be tried on the latest indictment. There's an existing Order of Removal that, AFAIK, is still valid EXCEPT for deportation to El Salvador.If he’s found not guilty (he will be) he won’t be deported.
That's debatable.I'm not an idiot.
Well, yeah, he did. Of course, the economy was pretty good, but Biden wasn't able to promote his position on account of his brain turning into tapioca.Trump hasn't even implied that we have anything like the German problems in the 20's and 30's.
No one over the age of about 4 believed that.
You're over the line again.
Cite, please.Well, yeah, he did.
Because that's what he was told.Then why did he say something that was obviously untrue?
First, that's your opinion, Second, on balance he's far, far better than anything the other side has had to offer.Furthermore, why do you support a man who lies to you?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?