• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump’s Running Tab in the Abrego Garcia Case

Well, the only thing I can suggest is that you find another job, where you don't have to depend on a supplier in China.

Why, because Trump says so.

The guy who gets his MAGA Hats and cheap-ass watches from China?

The problem is, even if I didn't buy products from China (nearly impossible if you know anything about manufacturing), the effects of his infationary tariffs go far beyond that.

The main reason why Powell won't cut the interest rates is because he's trying to keep a lid on the inflation Trump is causing.

That'll put a house out of the reach of a lot of people.


"What they're doing right" is paying their workers almost nothing.

Actually, 300 Million Chinese have advanced into the middle class while America's middle class is declining.

That's just all too much "class warfare" crap for me to want to deal with.
Too scary for you, I know.

I used to vote Republican, until the day I realized that I don't make enough money to vote Republican and neither do you.

This is how they keep you stupid.
 
Why, because Trump says so.
No, because you have delivery problems.
The guy who gets his MAGA Hats and cheap-ass watches from China?
His job doesn't depend on getting reliable deliveries of "cheap ass" items. Yours, apparently, does.
The problem is, even if I didn't buy products from China (nearly impossible if you know anything about manufacturing), the effects of his infationary tariffs go far beyond that.
Not yet, they don't.
The main reason why Powell won't cut the interest rates is because he's trying to keep a lid on the inflation Trump is causing.
No, the main reason is because Powell is too stupid to do anything else.
That'll put a house out of the reach of a lot of people.
Powell already has. And he's causing people who have ARMs to lose their homes.
Actually, 300 Million Chinese have advanced into the middle class while America's middle class is declining.
Being in the Chinese middle class isn't saying much, and it's not made up of the people who assemble the parts you need.
Too scary for you, I know.
No, too ignorant. Too slavish to a Party.
I used to vote Republican, until the day I realized that I don't make enough money to vote Republican and neither do you.
LOL! I make plenty of money. But I voted Republican before I did because it makes sense. Liberalism doesn't. It's all class envy.
This is how they keep you stupid
Stupid is reciting crap your betters tell you to.
 
His job doesn't depend on getting reliable deliveries of "cheap ass" items. Yours, apparently, does.

No, I'll have a job regardless... it's just how much time I'll have to waste expediting when I should be doing better things.

No, the main reason is because Powell is too stupid to do anything else.

Actually, Powell is using the main tool that the Fed has to control inflation. What we don't want is a repeat of the 70's and 80s, where it took three recessions to get inflation under control. So far, Powell has been able to curb inflation without tipping us into recession.

Of course, Trump is working very hard to fix that.

Being in the Chinese middle class isn't saying much, and it's not made up of the people who assemble the parts you need.
China's growth has been a marvel.
 
No, I'll have a job regardless... it's just how much time I'll have to waste expediting when I should be doing better things.
No job is perfect.
Actually, Powell is using the main tool that the Fed has to control inflation.
Actually, Powell is using the only tool he knows. This isn't 1920. We have huge supercomputers and the beginnings of AI. I'm sure the Fed isn't hampered by a lack of people to do research. If Powell were smart enough to do anything but try to look wise, he could raise interest rates only where additional money supply would actually be limited.
China's growth has been a marvel.
When anything starts at near zero, any growth is, statistically, a marvel.
 
Actually, Powell is using the only tool he knows. This isn't 1920. We have huge supercomputers and the beginnings of AI. I'm sure the Fed isn't hampered by a lack of people to do research. If Powell were smart enough to do anything but try to look wise, he could raise interest rates only where additional money supply would actually be limited.

Actually, Powell was doing a fine job of getting inflation under control until Cheeto Hitler decided to muck it up with tariffs.

When anything starts at near zero, any growth is, statistically, a marvel.

Today the Chinese have conservatives wetting their beds... that's a lot of advancement.
 
It appears to be the view of people on the left that it - like most things - is about feelings. That's baloney. Neither of us knows what happens in offices when an error is discovered at the time documents are meant to be reviewed. But when docs are years late, it adds to the suspicion that the "error" may be more than that.
Since when, in America, is suspicion enough?
 
Actually, Powell was doing a fine job of getting inflation under control until Cheeto Hitler decided to muck it up with tariffs.
Tariffs haven't caused any inflation. Please try to keep up. And grow up.
Today the Chinese have conservatives wetting their beds
Really? Is that because they're buying American farm land next to American military bases? Or is it because of all the young, single Chinese males that Biden allowed into the country, unquestioned?
 
Tariffs haven't caused any inflation. Please try to keep up. And grow up.

Sure it has. It just hasn't trickled down to the consumer yet.

Really? Is that because they're buying American farm land next to American military bases? Or is it because of all the young, single Chinese males that Biden allowed into the country, unquestioned?

Tell me you spend too much time watching Fox News without telling me you watch too much Fox News.

Right, there's a secret PLA division, hiding in the shadows, waiting for their orders from Comrade Xi to emerge from all the restaurants, massage parlors, and nail salons!!!
 
Be specific on how that supports your point. If we wanted TACO to try and comply with the SCOTUS order to facilitate Abrego Garcia's return...why not see the situation "in real life?"
In real life Democrat Senator Van Holland's fixation on the so-called Maryland dad was an ineffectual publicity stunt. Spouting Orange Man Bad invective before and after he met Garcia for Margaritas in El Salvador generated loads of publicity for the Senator but accomplished nothing for his illegal alien "constituent". In real life that’s known as exploitation.

Naturally you fail to mention it was the Trump administration that returned Garcia to the US in compliance with the SCOTUS order. The publicity stunt cocktail party having failed in real life.
I am unaware of this, please provide a link. And what was wrong with their demand?
Blowhard Democrat law makers spouting falsehoods about a Constitutional crisis and due process attempting to independently conduct foreign policy is wrong. All braying and virtue signaling didn't get Garcia returned to the US. Neither did the false accusations claiming the Trump administration was doing nothing. It was a tropical vacation for their benefit, not Garcia's.

Well I go with what SCOTUS said on the matter, which is that he didnt. So...what do you have to dispute that?
Don't know which of the SCOTUS orders you think found Garcia didn't receive due process. The one ordering the Trump administration to effect his return did so on the basis of his deportion to the country of El Salvador, not because of any deprivation of due process. The Saturday Night Special order in which the SCOTUS defined new requirements for deportation under the Alien Enemies Act applies only to future deportations. There is no retroactive demand to apply the process. Is there another relevant SCOTUS order? Please be specific.



Again...why wouldnt Democrats fight for justice for someone? And why wouldnt they continue to see that he faces justice by trying to prevent his deportation?
Democrats weren't fighting for justice with hysterical claims of Constitutional crisis and no due process. They were exploiting Garcia for their own partisan political advantage.

Garcia now faces a dilemma of get out on bail to be deported to a strange country or face the same deportation after his trial and prison.
So...you still did nothing but ask questions...you failed on an even bigger scale. Your posts are a MAGA embarrassment.
You made multiple posts demanding I post links to "everything" and then complaining there was nothing to debate. Kindly explain how it's a MAGA embarassment to ask questions for clarification of your complaints. Oh wait, your response to the questions is debate and shows your recognition of some facts at some level. Why the charade?
 
In real life Democrat Senator Van Holland's fixation on the so-called Maryland dad was an ineffectual publicity stunt. Spouting Orange Man Bad invective before and after he met Garcia for Margaritas in El Salvador generated loads of publicity for the Senator but accomplished nothing for his illegal alien "constituent". In real life that’s known as exploitation.

This is your opinion. It was a valid trip to see if he was ok, since there were even rumors that he'd been killed. In fact, since Abrego Garcia was easily accessible and produced, there's no reason he couldnt have just left and gotten on a plane with that entourage. After all, remember the "wink wink" excuse that Bukele gave TACO in the WH?

""How can I return him to the United States? Like if I smuggle him into the United States?" Bukele said, sitting beside Trump in the Oval Office, when he was asked whether he’d return Kilmar Abrego Garcia". link

So, your reply is fact-free except for Van Holland's name.

Naturally you fail to mention it was the Trump administration that returned Garcia to the US in compliance with the SCOTUS order. The publicity stunt cocktail party having failed in real life.

Why mention the obvious...quote where that's been denied? That's why they desperately grasped the dropped human trafficking considerations...so they'd have an excuse to actually comply with the SCOTUS order without admitting they made a mistake.

So...another fail for you.

Blowhard Democrat law makers spouting falsehoods about a Constitutional crisis and due process attempting to independently conduct foreign policy is wrong.

Please post some that are false?

All braying and virtue signaling didn't get Garcia returned to the US. Neither did the false accusations claiming the Trump administration was doing nothing. It was a tropical vacation for their benefit, not Garcia's.


See above.
 
Don't know which of the SCOTUS orders you think found Garcia didn't receive due process. The one ordering the Trump administration to effect his return did so on the basis of his deportion to the country of El Salvador, not because of any deprivation of due process. The Saturday Night Special order in which the SCOTUS defined new requirements for deportation under the Alien Enemies Act applies only to future deportations. There is no retroactive demand to apply the process. Is there another relevant SCOTUS order? Please be specific.

Here you go, from the George Washington University Law Review:

"The Supreme Court has affirmed a lower court's ruling that Kilmar Abrego Garcia, wrongly deported to El Salvador, is entitled to due process and ordered the Trump administration to facilitate his return to the United States.​
On April 10, 2025, the Supreme Court issued its ruling on the Government’s request.9 In a unanimous decision authored by Chief Justice John Roberts, the Court affirmed the lawlessness of Mr. Abrego Garcia’s removal to a Salvadoran prison, observing that even “[t]he United States acknowledges that Abrego Garcia was subject to a withholding order forbidding his removal to El Salvador, and that the removal to El Salvador was therefore illegal.”1
And in fact, the extent to which there will be defiance is currently unfolding. Despite a sworn declaration from a DHS official admitting that Mr. Abrego Garcia’s removal was an “administrative error” and an “oversight,19 plus the Supreme Court ordering the administration to “facilitate and effectuate” his return,20 the Government is completely abdicating its responsibility. On April 15, 2025, another DHS official filed a sworn declaration with the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland stating that “DHS does not have authority to forcibly extract an alien from the domestic custody of a foreign sovereign nation.”21 The official also included blatant lies regarding the underlying removal proceedings and an insultingly preposterous claim that DHS will facilitate his entry to the United States “if he presents at a port of entry.”22 (Lursa: He was produced and could have just left with Van Holland.)
the Court’s unanimous decision in Abrego Garcia, the Government’s position means that “it could deport and incarcerate any person, including U.S. citizens, without legal consequence, so long as it does so before a court can intervene.”23 Indeed, in a bit of authoritarian political theater, President Trump hosted Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele in an Oval Office meeting where both men affirmed their intention not to return Mr. Abrego Garcia to his family.24
LOL Remember? Like I wrote, "wink wink" and I guess some MAGA were stupid enough to believe it.


You made multiple posts demanding I post links to "everything" and then complaining there was nothing to debate. Kindly explain how it's a MAGA embarassment to ask questions for clarification of your complaints. Oh wait, your response to the questions is debate and shows your recognition of some facts at some level. Why the charade?

I backed my statements up...too bad you cant do the same, after multiple requests. You couldnt back up a single ONE except with silly opinion that I tore up with basic facts & events that happened publicly.

MAGA should be embarrassed, showing how stupid they are attempting to deny and justify what's public knowledge, showing how subservient they are to the king.
 
Last edited:
Note that the OPINION piece you linked distorts the facts in its headlong support of Orange Man Bad rhetoric. The authors explain withholding of removal at length but conveniently neglect to mention the immigration court's order only barred Garcia's deportation to his home country of El Salvador.
Here you go, from the George Washington University Law Review:

"The Supreme Court has affirmed a lower court's ruling that Kilmar Abrego Garcia, wrongly deported to El Salvador, is entitled to due process and ordered the Trump administration to facilitate his return to the United States.​
Sorry, I can't locate this paragraph in the linked article. I assume you are presenting the quotes in roughly the same order as they appear in the article and so focused my search accordingly.

There is no dispute Garcia is entitled to the due process he received in immigration court. Democrats claim not a shred of due process while citing the withholding of removal court order. The scholarly opinion writers don't make this mistake.

On April 10, 2025, the Supreme Court issued its ruling on the Government’s request.9 In a unanimous decision authored by Chief Justice John Roberts, the Court affirmed the lawlessness of Mr. Abrego Garcia’s removal to a Salvadoran prison, observing that even “[t]he United States acknowledges that Abrego Garcia was subject to a withholding order forbidding his removal to El Salvador, and that the removal to El Salvador was therefore illegal.”1​
This is the end of the quote from the SCOTUS order.
And in fact, the extent to which there will be defiance is currently unfolding. . . Edited for length.​

The official also included blatant lies regarding the underlying removal proceedings and an insultingly preposterous claim that DHS will facilitate his entry to the United States “if he presents at a port of entry.”22 (Lursa: He was produced and could have just left with Van Holland.)
the Court’s unanimous decision in Abrego Garcia, the Government’s position means that “it could deport and incarcerate any person, including U.S. citizens, without legal consequence, so long as it does so before a court can intervene.”23
The article's authors attempt to wrap their hyperbole in Justice Sotomayor's florid concurring opinion as if that is the court's opinion.

Indeed, in a bit of authoritarian political theater, President Trump hosted Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele in an Oval Office meeting where both men affirmed their intention not to return Mr. Abrego Garcia to his family.24
LOL Remember? Like I wrote, "wink wink" and I guess some MAGA were stupid enough to believe it.
Bolding and increased size to draw attention to demagoguery is ill considered. The Trump administration was engaged in what turned out to be a successful effort to comply with the SCOTUS order. Just like the phony Russian collusion hoax the Orange Man Bad lynch mob never admits its mistakes, just looks for another smear to rachet up the hatred.

Garcia could have walked out of the Senator's cocktail party except for the fact he was a prisoner confined to an El Salvadorean jail. A US Senator, even a Democrat one, ought not to be able to command a sovereign nation to release one of its citizens in furtherence of a scheme for human trafficking. Garcia couldn't just walk out because he was a prisioner and because reentry into the US would have been illegal.
I backed my statements up... edited for length
All you proved is your ability to filibuster.
MAGA should be embarrassed,
Talk about ironic.
 
You made multiple posts demanding I post links to "everything" and then complaining there was nothing to debate. Kindly explain how it's a MAGA embarassment to ask questions for clarification of your complaints. Oh wait, your response to the questions is debate and shows your recognition of some facts at some level. Why the charade?

So, now you make excuses again not to back up your empty claims about Dems and our motives? Of course you do...you cant produce anything.

Note that the OPINION piece you linked distorts the facts in its headlong support of Orange Man Bad rhetoric. The authors explain withholding of removal at length but conveniently neglect to mention the immigration court's order only barred Garcia's deportation to his home country of El Salvador.

Sorry, I can't locate this paragraph in the linked article. I assume you are presenting the quotes in roughly the same order as they appear in the article and so focused my search accordingly.

😭 You poor victim! I produce...you cannot...all you can do is continue to try and hide. That's fine...because everyone else can read the quotes posted that show you're wrong (y)

;) Yeah...the George Washington University Law Review is just "an opinion piece." It's a legal opinion and it cited its points.

Besides, all it had to verify was the denial of due process. Which it did.

There is no dispute Garcia is entitled to the due process he received in immigration court. Democrats claim not a shred of due process while citing the withholding of removal court order. The scholarly opinion writers don't make this mistake.

Backpedaling now? Figures

This is the end of the quote from the SCOTUS order.

The article's authors attempt to wrap their hyperbole in Justice Sotomayor's florid concurring opinion as if that is the court's opinion.

Bolding and increased size to draw attention to demagoguery is ill considered. The Trump administration was engaged in what turned out to be a successful effort to comply with the SCOTUS order. Just like the phony Russian collusion hoax the Orange Man Bad lynch mob never admits its mistakes, just looks for another smear to rachet up the hatred.

LOL Complaining about text you dont like is weak sauce...where are your counterarguments? You just made up the bold...it's a lie. You have no idea such a thing was in progress during that WH public meeting. YOU MADE IT UP. :ROFLMAO:

Nothing even happened until after Van Holland went to ES...when, with a single word from TACO...he could have brought Abrego Garcia back with him. Your posts are desperae fantasy jokes.

Garcia could have walked out of the Senator's cocktail party except for the fact he was a prisoner confined to an El Salvadorean jail. A US Senator, even a Democrat one, ought not to be able to command a sovereign nation to release one of its citizens in furtherence of a scheme for human trafficking. Garcia couldn't just walk out because he was a prisioner and because reentry into the US would have been illegal.

It's hilarious you write that when you've read (and I hope comprehended the simple words) that Bukele said he couldnt "smuggle him back"...and there was no such need. Your responses are pathetic.

All you proved is your ability to filibuster.

Cry moar...you've disputed nothing and produced nothing but a lot of obvious effort to escape your failure. Post 386 remains as a reference.
 
Back
Top Bottom