- Joined
- Dec 12, 2016
- Messages
- 43,115
- Reaction score
- 19,739
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
What is wrong with highlighting an injustice done to someone granted protection by the US government??
What is wrong with highlighting an injustice done to someone granted protection by the US government??You're proud of showboaters, who accomplished nothing, on your dime. Doesn't take much, does it?
Yes. Again, how is highlighting an injustice mere showboating? Were the Supreme Court Justices showboating when they told Trump to bring the guy back?You're proud of showboaters, who accomplished nothing, on your dime. Doesn't take much, does it?
Nothing. What's wrong is taking taxpayer money to move a crowd to El Salvador (plane fare, hotels, meals ) for nothing more than a photo op.What is wrong with highlighting an injustice done to someone granted protection by the US government??
Can't he "highlight" from D.C.?Again, how is highlighting an injustice mere showboating?
Well, first, they didn't. And second, what they did, they did from their offices in D.C.. Third, there were no TV cameras there.Were the Supreme Court Justices showboating when they told Trump to bring the guy back?
Of course they do. Does that make it OK?To be fair, however, you can obviously argue that neither Trump nor republicans ever showboat.
No, I 130 is for an immediate relative including spouses of US citizens.I-130 has to do with the status of an adopted child, not citizenship for a person married to a citizen. I think you mean a form N-400.
It's a form for a Permanent Resident, a status Abrego-Garcia lost in 2019.
A question on that form asks,
"Have you EVER
Advocated (supported and promoted) any of the following, or been a member of, involved in, or in any
way associated with any group anywhere in the world that advocated any of the following:
The unlawful damage, injury, or destruction of property;"
Another question is
"Have you EVER ordered, incited, called for, committed, assisted, helped with, or otherwise participated in any of the following:
Intentionally and severely injuring or trying to injure any person?"
And
"Were you EVER a part of any group, or did you EVER help any group, unit, or organization that used
a weapon against any person, or threatened to do so? "
You get the point. Besides which he has had the opportunity in the past to submit that form, but hasn't bothered to. That says to me that he really didn't want to be a US citizen.
Garcia has already been charged. It was necessary to effect his return per the SCOTUS order.You're agreeing with me? Great. I do agree that they should charge him if they have the evidence.
OK. An I-130 is for an alien relative that wants a green card. An I-400 is for naturalization.No, I 130 is for an immediate relative including spouses of US citizens.
No, not visit..a tourist visa or a B2 visa is appropriate for that you don’t visit and then apply that’s a violation of visitor visa rules.OK. An I-130 is for an alien relative that wants a green card. An I-400 is for naturalization.
In the situation where an alien relative wants to visit this country with the intent of applying for a green card, the I-130 is the correct form.
In the situation in which someone wants a spouse who is an alien to become a citizen by virtue of being married to a citizen, the I-400 is the correct form.
It helped accomplish the objective sought, a measure of justice for the man. You have no other government spending to be outraged at?Nothing. What's wrong is taking taxpayer money to move a crowd to El Salvador (plane fare, hotels, meals ) for nothing more than a photo op.
No, it didn't. He's still in jail and will stay there until 3 days before he's deported to some other country. Maybe So. Sudan?It helped accomplish the objective sought, a measure of justice for the man.
Sure. And the administration is hard at work on that.You have no other government spending to be outraged at?
The courts will have their say on the man, but I fear for him in light of Trump’s vindictiveness. Again, the US granted him protection from deportation to El Salvador, a designation that requires a higher standard of proof than asylum.No, it didn't. He's still in jail and will stay there until 3 days before he's deported to some other country. Maybe So. Sudan?
Sure. And the administration is hard at work on that.
Nah, I don't much care where they send him. Somewhere that he can deal with the language would be best.Good to know that you might like the idea of sending the guy to Sudan, a disaster human rights-wise.
Good. And the law says he can't stay here.Since I am an American patriot, who as a child could see the Statue of Liberty from my home in Brooklyn, I believe in what the statue stands for, liberty and the rule of law.
WRONG. It's not Trump that's trying to keep him here in spite of the law. That's you.Trump obviously doesn’t believe in these things,
Why? Has Garcia made that many people around the world hate him?so Garcia may have his life at risk thanks to Donald’s pettiness
Nope. Garcia has just let the world know that he's a wife beater, one of the lowest scum in the pond.After all, he made the Dear Leader look bad.
Everyone? Of course not. Just whoever they wanted to. Later, of course, they played a key role in the Holocaust.
You'll have to ask a "right-wing gun nut," if you can find one. You won't find one who has ambushed federal officers, as your friends encourage.
Oh, no. It's terrible. I'll be in mourning for at least five minutes. Six, tops.Sounds an awful lot as if you think killing federal officers is OK. Do you?
If you'd pull your head out, you'd recall that I am sympathetic to him. Your anger now seems to be because I bothered to find out WHY his case is in doubt, instead of just accepting your ignorance about it. That just demonstrates how libs don't think, they just feel.
Except for major crimes, it doesn't. Multiple crimes might, though.
Nope. In fact my lawyer complimented me on how well organized the paperwork I submitted was (11 years in the army, the one thing I learned was how to do meaningless paperwork), and the green card was approved in record time.It isn't. Maybe you f**ked up. Your attitude makes it seem likely.
Human rights are not rewards for good behavior. Trump has rights despite molesting women.Nah, I don't much care where they send him. Somewhere that he can deal with the language would be best.
Good. And the law says he can't stay here.
WRONG. It's not Trump that's trying to keep him here in spite of the law. That's you.
Why? Has Garcia made that many people around the world hate him?
Nope. Garcia has just let the world know that he's a wife beater, one of the lowest scum in the pond.
The difference is that people will get out of Alligator Alcatraz, some within a very short time, others will remain while an accepting country is found. If you think that "concentration camp" is anything at all like the Nazi concentration/death camps, you must be very young.Yes, too bad no one opposed them before they started building Dachau. Now we see Miller and Trump building a concentration camp in the Everglades.
And you would make folk heroes of people who kill ICE and CBP agents.Really? People are STILL trying to make David Koresh into a martyr for shooting at ATF Agents. 30 years later.
Intelligence is knowing the circumstances before one just accepts the Party line.No, sympathy is opposing an injustice, not trying to rationalize it.
Got it! Only violent offenses count as law violations. I started out feeling sorry for this guy, but you're convincing me to just let him stay in So. Korea.Nope. Nothing this guy did was a violent offense, the only person he was hurting was himself. What they are doing to him is truly Kafka-esque.
There is no "human right" to illegally take up residence in this country.Human rights are not rewards for good behavior.
The law only said that he could stay here until he was deported to some country other than El Salvador. The law says that as soon as he gets out of his present jail, he'll be deported.The law has said that Garcia can stay here; that’s why the court unanimously asked that he be returned.
His fate will be determined by the law, your sick hatred of Trump notwithstanding.The main factor affecting his fate may not be the letter of the law, however, but Big Baby Trump having looked bad and wanting revenge.
Read the Refugee Act of 1980. I have problem per se with people taking up residence illegally being deported. But some on the right (and I am sure there are some on the left as well) either want to pretend ignorance of the law, honestly don’t know the law, or perhaps more likely, have difficult either grasping or accepting that there is tension between a country’s right to control entry by foreigners and say, the US obligations under the Refugee Act and the three relevant Senate-ratified treaties that guarantee the rights of refugees.There is no "human right" to illegally take up residence in this country.
The law only said that he could stay here until he was deported to some country other than El Salvador. The law says that as soon as he gets out of his present jail, he'll be deported.
His fate will be determined by the law, your sick hatred of Trump notwithstanding.
I've read it. As the title implies, it deals with refugees, asylum seekers.Read the Refugee Act of 1980.
The difference is that people will get out of Alligator Alcatraz, some within a very short time, others will remain while an accepting country is found. If you think that "concentration camp" is anything at all like the Nazi concentration/death camps, you must be very young.
And you would make folk heroes of people who kill ICE and CBP agents.
Got it! Only violent offenses count as law violations. I started out feeling sorry for this guy, but you're convincing me to just let him stay in So. Korea.
I've read it. As the title implies, it deals with refugees, asylum seekers.
During the Biden years of 2021, 2022 and 2023, 9.08%, 9.09% and 9.1% of asylum seekers were granted asylum in the US. From some countries it was as low as 1%.
What;s your point?
Odd then, isn't it, that it was always referred to as The Final Solution? Did the initial construction include the gas chambers as actual showers so weary travelers could refresh themselves?The original Nazi plan wasn't to exterminate them, either.
Oh, well then, killing them is OK.Even ICE doesn't like what they are doing.
Please don't pretend that you think beyond your TDS.Please don't pretend your thinking in this case ever went beyond, "Well, he's not white!"
The rest were rejected, not left in limbo.Yes, that's the problem. Because the aslyum machinery was busted up by the Human Reptile and his Orange Fuhrer, there's no one to hear these cases, so millions of people wereleft in Limbo.
Odd then, isn't it, that it was always referred to as The Final Solution? Did the initial construction include the gas chambers as actual showers so weary travelers could refresh themselves?
Please don't pretend that you think beyond your TDS.
Not really true.The rest were rejected, not left in limbo.
| [td]Immigration Court Backlog: Overall Down, Asylum Backlog Up |
How do you 'know' that? Been there?The difference is that people will get out of Alligator Alcatraz, some within a very short time, others will remain while an accepting country is found. If you think that "concentration camp" is anything at all like the Nazi concentration/death camps, you must be very young.
Where do folk heroes come from?And you would make folk heroes of people who kill ICE and CBP agents.
Nope, it's more than that.Intelligence is knowing the circumstances before one just accepts the Party line.
Which poster made that claim? Quote?Got it! Only violent offenses count as law violations. I started out feeling sorry for this guy, but you're convincing me to just let him stay in So. Korea.
No, one doesn't have to worry about that. One has to worry if one has no food for the family and no way to get any, but not about your comment.One has to worry what Trump and Miller are going to do when countries stop taking back citizens, and they can't fob them off anymore on Sudan and El Salvador.
Yes, true. The 9% figures I quoted are obviously the percentage of those that have been adjudicated. 91% of those that were adjudicated during those three years were denied. The backlog is another matter. It will be improved by using qualified JAG's at places like Alligator Alcatraz, as Trump has suggested.Not really true.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?