- Joined
- Oct 2, 2023
- Messages
- 669
- Reaction score
- 485
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Socialist
Now let's assume that having access to an unlocked firearm is endangering the life of a minor. Which it is. What's going to happen is CPS is going to make a lot of house visits because a kid telling a teacher they have access to firearms without the supervision of a parent.
Ah, so the gun control industry is lying. Thank you.
It's like you took a shot and missed the target entirely.
Sounds like you shot a big bore rifle or a shotgun with full power loads. Handguns are a lot different. Just went to the range today and my wife was having a great time with her Shield EZ 380 (handgun). She followed that up with hitting steel targets at 600 yds with a 5.56mm AR-15. No problems noted.
Couldn't tell you. I was a kid at the time. Never fire another gun.
So, teacher moves the students into a corner and tales position in front of them.
Not if they are taught correctly.
Why would the gun be locked up unloaded? That is stupid. We are talking about allowing properly trained and screened educators to carry a concealed handgun. That handgun will be on their person and should be loaded. An unloaded gun is just a paperweight. When I carry, it is always in Condition 1. Cocked and locked. Loaded with one in chamber and safety on.
After the shooter had entered the classroom. If one of the two teachers in the classroom had been armed, the outcome could have been a lot better. Doubt it would have been much worse.
That is not a reason to pull a gun. Which is why we screen the teachers.
I'm sorry but I can't take this seriously, this is ridiculous on its face. Give me a serious argument. You are clearly a gun nerd. You know a lot about guns and how to use them. But this is something that unless you teach you will almost never realize. Not everyone is a nerd like you. You have to meet the people who are not gun nerds at their level. In other words you need to make a human argument. You're effectively saying "if only everyone is like me then we wouldn't have these problems". You're making scenarios that are perfect. I mean listen to your argument. The teacher is going to step in front of the kids in the corner. What's going to happen if the teacher forgets the safety is on in the moment and the gunman sees a gun? They're going to shoot into the crowd of children!
That's not what you're talking about, but it's clearly devoid from reality. Make an argument that's rooted in reality.
Why would the gun be in the desk? It should;d always be on the person responsible for it. That is why it is called CONCEALED CARRY.
Weren't you just asking how people are going to know if a teacher has a firearm.
You can "what if" it to death. The point is that it is better to give teachers the option than deny them an effective way to fight back.
A firearm in a classroom is not effective at fighting back. Want to know what is effective? Making sure students have full bellies when they go into a classroom. Stops a lot of classroom disruptions before they boil over into a path that leads to mass shootings.