Peralin
Active member
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2005
- Messages
- 426
- Reaction score
- 6
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
AlbqOwl said:All we can prove with Scriptures (or any source actually) is the belief or opinion of the writer at that time. What the Christian world refers to as the Old Testament and also the New Testament is rich with history, metaphor, symbolism, poetry, allegory, parable, apocalyptic code, imagery, and theology, but all it proves is the perception, understanding, and sense of the person and culture of that time.
Without experience, all we know of anything is theory. Until somebody actually walked on the moon, its texture, substance, etc. was all speculative. Until we go back, much of what we know of the moon is still speculative though less so because we now have some experience. Evenso, we have to have confidence in the ones reporting their experience in order to adopt their belief as our own. There are actually quite a few people alive now who believe the moonwalk was an elaboate hoax.
Regarding our understanding of God, who Jesus was, or any of the mysteries surrounding both, the Apostle Paul poignantly explained through a metaphor of 'looking through a dark glass' that gives you some images but obscures the big picture. And we have the reported prophecies of the Old Testament and the reported testimonies of Jesus (and others) of the New Testament of what a part of that big picture looks like. And as Jesus and the Apostle Paul explained, it is by the power of the Holy Spirit - the third person of the Godhead - that causes us to believe it.
It is my belief, based on experience, that those who yield themselves to be instructed, touched, guided, changed by God will come to believe, perhaps not exactly as I believe, but they will receive their own truth. Such yielding has to be with no strings attached, however. Too many try to attach their own chosen dogma, rules, timelines, specific criteria to the request and thus attempt to tie God's hands from the beginning. It has been my experience, that tactic doesn't work well. But for those who don't put God in a box, who can let God be God, almost all come to understand and accept the doctrine of the Trinity.
My best feeble, and most inadequate, explanation of this is that God is Spirit after all, and it is only spiritually that He can be known or understood at all.
The trinity is made up. Why do people believe such nonsense? How can 3 beings possibly be 1 being. It is impossible! Some people say "Everything is possible with God", but if we believe in everything that is possibe, why do we believe in only 1 god?
If anything is possible, 3 beings can be 1 being. If anything is possible, God could split himself into 20 and we could actually have 20 gods. We can't possibly believe in everything that is possible, so why do we choose the trinity as on of the "impossible things" to believe in? It doesn't make sense.
The only credible idea I've heard is that God split himself into 3, and one part, Jesus, came to Earth, and had to communicate witht he other 2 parts of God. But, if that's the case, Jesus would be only 33.3% divine, since he gave the other 2/3 to the Spirit and the Father.
But anyway, the whole idea of 3-in-1 is ridiculous, and I hope you've realized that there are only a few passages from the gospels that suggest that jesus was the same being as God. And the Bible is all that Christians live by, is it not? So, if it is not in the Bible (not very often, at least), why do people believe it?
I think it is because it is a common belief of Christians. As I went through grade school, I always thought that Catholics were better than everyone else and that everything the pope said was true. Catholics were right, everyone else was wrong. So I believed in the trinity too. Luckily, I've realized that Catholicism is not perfect and that the trinity is not well-supported in the Bible, so I gave up that belief.