• We will be taking the server down at approximately 3:30 AM ET on Wednesday, 10/8/25. We have a hard drive that is in the early stages of failure and this is necessary to prevent data loss. We hope to be back up and running quickly, however this process could take some time.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Top DOJ Official Defends New Memorandum on Targeting Parents

Good to hear!!

He's been hated here for a year or more.

After the 2020 doxxing incident and the attempted kidnapping of a school principal, all his boog buddies kept away and his business attracted bricks. It's inexplicable.
 
Nope. Until we have evidence of the FBI coming anywhere close to what was going on in the 60s, these complaints are going to be dismissed as pathetic whining.

The only real difference between then and now, is that social media sites make now much more public for planning and viewing a record of who is involved than it was before. That
Really? You have right to be skeptical of the FBI investigating the Weather Underground, but not of the FBI invetigating soccer moms at school board meetings?
 
Where have you been since George Floyd?
Watching like everybody else.

But I haven't seen a single city that was burned down. You know, smoking rubble. Few if any buildings left standing.

The usual definition of "burned down".

What y'all refer to is fires set. Some buildings burned down.

NOT cities burned down, by any realistic definition.

Great term to use for propaganda purposes. Nice evocation of emotions. Just not semantically or realistically valid.
 
And for the last year and a half, it's been that literally
I was there in September of last year. Went right where the "epicenter" is. No burned out buildings. Some damage to facades. Lots of graffiti, some broken glass and repaired glass.

And interestingly, both there and a "CHOP", all that video we saw was just different angles of the same small areas. Easy to recognize from all the repetition. But literally just a turn of the camera, not a completely different scene as it was presented to you.
 
Really? You have right to be skeptical of the FBI investigating the Weather Underground, but not of the FBI invetigating soccer moms at school board meetings?
You do realize what the Weather Underground did, right? And I have no complaints at all about them investigating WUO. Mind you, it was far before my time, but a group that definitely was a danger to others. They were not the only ones being investigated by the FBI though back then.

And these people protesting are not all soccer moms just going to school board meetings. That is a misrepresentation of who is leading these protests, pushing for them, telling them lies to spread, filling those people full of misinformation.
 
Really? You have right to be skeptical of the FBI investigating the Weather Underground, but not of the FBI invetigating soccer moms at school board meetings?
I didn't see a lot of soccer moms threatening anyone. Saw a lot of men running their mouths, though. Moms are pissed too, but they graduated kindergarten and know where to draw the line.
 
I didn't see a lot of soccer moms threatening anyone. Saw a lot of men running their mouths, though. Moms are pissed too, but they graduated kindergarten and know where to draw the line.
I haven't seen anyone threatening violence at a school board meeting. Have you?
 
I didn't see a lot of soccer moms threatening anyone. Saw a lot of men running their mouths, though. Moms are pissed too, but they graduated kindergarten and know where to draw the line.
Not all of them. That one I posted has hit other people and definitely has no problem running her mouth off.
 
And Barney Fife is completely capable of doing that, we don't need Elliot Ness.
From the DOJ statement I read, they are basically meeting with locals and helping the Barney Fifes get their shit together. A national association requested help with a nationwide problem. Obviously, local pd has already been involved but the problem is getting worse. Time the threats stopped.
 
Not all of them. That one I posted has hit other people and definitely has no problem running her mouth off.
The redhead in the pony tail?

I didn't hear her threaten anyone though. Maybe I missed the video you're talking about?
 







No I'm not. Not at all. You're either blind or condone this. The purpose of DOJ investigations is to intimidate parents into allowing school boards to continue this neo-Marxist education agenda. This is a teachers union driven agenda.
Wow somebody has been chugging the 'commie' BS kool-aid. Seem to forget that Trump was practically serially sucking off 'commie' leaders in Russia, China, and North Korea. For God's sake can someone please hand that man a napkin. Oh wait a minute, I'm sure Pence always has one at the ready that he can use.
 
Death threats are not protected speech.

Some of these crazy Trump supporters and Republican friends of yours who hate vaccines are bat shit insane.

Now now now, you know it's all OUR fault because apparently these anti-vaccine people would be nice if we the arrogantly vaccinated wouldn't be so mean to them.
 
Well. Evidently the police didn't see it as a threat of violence.
Good thing we have the FBI to help biased police departments then
 
From the DOJ statement I read, they are basically meeting with locals and helping the Barney Fifes get their shit together. A national association requested help with a nationwide problem. Obviously, local pd has already been involved but the problem is getting worse. Time the threats stopped.
What makes you believe local police are incapable of dealing with threats of violence? Is your local police department incompetent to handle such threats?
 



Sssshhhhh, tut tut, if we weren't so mean to them none of this would have happened!
Just ask @cpwill ! 🤣
 
What makes you believe local police are incapable of dealing with threats of violence? Is your local police department incompetent to handle such threats?
That's a question for NSBA, I guess.
 
Because it’s obviously a threat of future harassment
So, full circle. Liberals are endorsing the FBI opening files on parents that are speaking out against govt and haven't done anything criminal yet, but are angry and might do something criminal in the future.
 
Back
Top Bottom