• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Today's daily chuckle

If she had said “I” instead of “liberal women” then it would lack humor, but her claim to speak for others (as a fact, no less) is rather humorous.
I could see that, but not the laffriot part, seems a bit too much.
 
Anyone that constantly uses "alpha male" either on the right or the left is a piece of shit. That's just a fact and anyone who supports that type of toxicity is lmt far from it.
Well, then it's true what I said when I said:
and not spooked as some of you are
But it's a free country, if you want to consider her a piece of shit you are free to do so. You still won't be able to get a date with her, that much I can be sure of.
 
Because I'm married, also not into chick's with poor fashion sense
So, are you saying that your wife better dress in a fashion you approve of???? :oops:
 
I could see that, but not the laffriot part, seems a bit too much.

Anyone claiming as a fact that they speak for (millions of?) others is humorous. You speak for you, but not for “male Independents”.
 
Well, wearing a granny dress like that, she can be sure of being alpa male free,that's for sure.
she needs some lessons on how to dress, from a right wing woman!kimberly-guilfoyle copy.webp
Can I get a BOOM SHAKKKA LAKKA?
 
Which tweets do you support?
You must not have gotten some invitations this year.

You posted four Tweets that you deem “toxic bullshit,” you need to explain that!
 
Well, wearing a granny dress like that, she can be sure of being alpa male free,that's for sure.
she needs some lessons on how to dress, from a right wing woman!View attachment 67427833
Can I get a BOOM SHAKKKA LAKKA?
She should have something covering that right shoulder!

Front fat, side fat and you know there is back fat………
 
Well, wearing a granny dress like that, she can be sure of being alpa male free,that's for sure.
she needs some lessons on how to dress, from a right wing woman!View attachment 67427833
Can I get a BOOM SHAKKKA LAKKA?

Jude : Bit heavy on the powder, isn't she?

Dil : A girl has to have a bit of glamour.

Jude : Oh, absolutely. As long as she can keep it.

~ From The Crying Game
 
Anyone claiming as a fact that they speak for (millions of?) others is humorous. You speak for you, but not for “male Independents”.
Who is the OP speaking for when he says, "Today's daily chuckle..."?

Is he speaking for Today?
 
For all those who have reaches out to me privately to thank me for my DAILY CHUCKLE series. Your're welcome.

But honestly, with the Gaffemaster in chief-the material is endless.
 
You're missing the point, sheesh. OR more likely, attempting a whataboutism. Sheesh again.

It looks as if that is exactly the point. If she walks like she does because she doesn't have an "alpha male" in her life, it's reasonable to wonder whether she would stop walking with confidence if she does have an "alpha male" in her life.
 
For all those who have reaches out to me privately to thank me for my DAILY CHUCKLE series. Your're welcome.

But honestly, with the Gaffemaster in chief-the material is endless.
Yeah. Endless. That's the problem. Nobody would complain about a ten-minute break.
 
And he did it without an "I" or a "my".

It’s common sense to attribute a thread (or post) to it’s creator. “Today’s daily chuckle” indicates that such an allegedly humorous thread is created (by him) daily.
 
It’s common sense to attribute a thread (or post) to it’s creator. “Today’s daily chuckle” indicates that such an allegedly humorous thread is created (by him) daily.
It's common sense to assume the lady in the video doesn't actually speak for any liberal women other than herself either, but here we are.
 
It looks as if that is exactly the point. If she walks like she does because she doesn't have an "alpha male" in her life, it's reasonable to wonder whether she would stop walking with confidence if she does have an "alpha male" in her life.
Depends if the Alpha Male is an asshole or not. IF he is, she wouldn't be with him, hence her walking with confidence.
 
It's common sense to assume the lady in the video doesn't actually speak for any liberal women other than herself either, but here we are.

Nope, the opposite appears to be true:

Fact: liberal women walk with such swag and confidence because they are alpha male free.

“Liberal women” is clearly plural and “they” clearly refers to others. She didn’t even bother to use “we” (others including herself) instead of “they” (others excluding herself).
 
Back
Top Bottom