Today's daily chuckle

[less right]

Nope, the opposite appears to be true:



“Liberal women” is clearly plural and “they” clearly refers to others. She didn’t even bother to use “we” (others including herself) instead of “they” (others excluding herself).

That's where your common sense is supposed to kick in. As has been pointed out, she's not really speaking for all liberal women.

 

[ttwtt78640]

That's where your common sense is supposed to kick in. As has been pointed out, she's not really speaking for all liberal women.

She’s clearly not speaking for herself. BTW, see post #20 and find where I said “all liberal women”.

 

[holbritter]

What is the point? That you support toxic bullshit like this?

She sounds like an idiot.

 

[Crovax]

You must not have gotten some invitations this year.

You posted four Tweets that you deem “toxic bullshit,” you need to explain that!

I have to explain why continually characterizing the entirety of one side of the political spectrum is toxic?

I would only have to explain why that is toxic to someone who believes that stupid bullshit.

Do you need it explained to you? (I can break out the crayons)

 

[Rexedgar]

I have to explain why continually characterizing the entirety of one side of the political spectrum is toxic?

I would only have to explain why that is toxic to someone who believes that stupid bullshit.

Do you need it explained to you? (I can break out the crayons)

There, there……

I understand the Cowboys lost Sunday, it’ll be alright.

I bet you have the super Crayola assortment!

 

[RaleBulgarian]

Angela Belcamino
@AngelaBelcamino


Fact: liberal women walk with such swag and confidence because they are alpha male free.

LAFFRIOT!

Never heard of Belcamino.

Clearly, I haven’t been missing anything.

 

[RaleBulgarian]

Simple minds are easily amused.

And those with empty heads are even more easily amused.

 

[less right]

She’s clearly not speaking for herself.

No, according to you she is speaking for millions but not all.

BTW, see post #20 and find where I said “all liberal women”.

See post #51 and find where I said that you said that.

 

[ttwtt78640]

No, according to you she is speaking for millions but not all.

See post #51 and find where I said that you said that.

OK, how many “liberal women” was she speaking for when she said “they”?

 

[ttwtt78640]

She sounds like an idiot.

Yep, but was that ‘fact’ misinformation?

 

[less right]

OK, how many “liberal women” was she speaking for when she said “they”?

The same amount of people that are represented by the often repeated "fact"... "we know".